From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Thiner Logoer" <logoerthiner1@163.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] softmmu/physmem: never return directories from file_ram_open()
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 21:07:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807190736.572665-4-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807190736.572665-1-david@redhat.com>
open() does not fail on directories when opening them readonly (O_RDONLY).
Currently, we succeed opening such directories and fail later during
mmap(), resulting in a misleading error message.
$ ./qemu-system-x86_64 \
-object memory-backend-file,id=ram0,mem-path=tmp,readonly=true,size=1g
qemu-system-x86_64: unable to map backing store for guest RAM: No such device
To identify directories and handle them accordingly in file_ram_open()
also when readonly=true was specified, detect if we just opened a directory
using fstat() instead. Then, fail file_ram_open() right away, similarly
to how we now fail if the file does not exist and we want to open the
file readonly.
With this change, we get a nicer error message:
qemu-system-x86_64: can't open backing store tmp for guest RAM: Is a directory
Note that the only memory-backend-file will end up calling
memory_region_init_ram_from_file() -> qemu_ram_alloc_from_file() ->
file_ram_open().
Reported-by: Thiner Logoer <logoerthiner1@163.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
softmmu/physmem.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
index 9580567608..91f5f4c2a3 100644
--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
+++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
@@ -1300,6 +1300,25 @@ static int file_ram_open(const char *path,
for (;;) {
fd = open(path, readonly ? O_RDONLY : O_RDWR);
if (fd >= 0) {
+ /*
+ * open(O_RDONLY) won't fail with EISDIR. Check manually if we
+ * opened a directory and fail similarly to how we fail ENOENT
+ * in readonly mode. Note that mkstemp() would imply O_RDWR.
+ */
+ if (readonly) {
+ struct stat file_stat;
+
+ if (fstat(fd, &file_stat)) {
+ close(fd);
+ if (errno == EINTR) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ return -errno;
+ } else if (S_ISDIR(file_stat.st_mode)) {
+ close(fd);
+ return -EISDIR;
+ }
+ }
/* @path names an existing file, use it */
break;
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 19:07 [PATCH v1 0/3] softmmu/physmem: file_ram_open() readonly improvements David Hildenbrand
2023-08-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] softmmu/physmem: fallback to opening guest RAM file as readonly in a MAP_PRIVATE mapping David Hildenbrand
2023-08-08 21:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-09 5:39 ` ThinerLogoer
2023-08-09 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-09 15:15 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-10 14:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 17:06 ` ThinerLogoer
2023-08-10 21:24 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 5:49 ` ThinerLogoer
2023-08-11 14:31 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-12 6:21 ` ThinerLogoer
2023-08-22 13:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 19:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-12 5:18 ` ThinerLogoer
2023-08-17 9:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 14:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 14:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 14:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 14:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 14:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 14:41 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-17 15:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 15:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-17 15:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 15:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 15:31 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-17 15:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 13:46 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 13:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 14:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 15:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 16:16 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 16:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 16:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 16:54 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 17:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 21:07 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-21 12:20 ` Igor Mammedov
2023-08-11 15:47 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-17 13:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-17 13:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 13:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-07 19:07 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] softmmu/physmem: fail creation of new files in file_ram_open() with readonly=true David Hildenbrand
2023-08-07 19:07 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-08-08 17:26 ` Re:[PATCH v1 0/3] softmmu/physmem: file_ram_open() readonly improvements ThinerLogoer
2023-08-10 11:11 ` [PATCH " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-08-10 16:35 ` ThinerLogoer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230807190736.572665-4-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=logoerthiner1@163.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).