From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Shunsuke Mie <mie@igel.co.jp>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal of QEMU PCI Endpoint test environment
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:39:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230823060923.GA3737@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANXvt5oKt=AKdqv24LT079e+6URnfqJcfTJh0ajGA17paJUEKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:46:02PM +0900, Shunsuke Mie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are proposing to add a new test syste to Linux for PCIe Endpoint. That
> can be run on QEMU without real hardware. At present, partially we have
> confirmed that pci-epf-test is working, but it is not yet complete.
> However, we would appreciate your comments on the architecture design.
>
> # Background
> The background is as follows.
>
> PCI Endpoint function driver is implemented using the PCIe Endpoint
> framework, but it requires physical boards for testing, and it is difficult
> to test sufficiently. In order to find bugs and hardware-dependent
> implementations early, continuous testing is required. Since it is
> difficult to automate tests that require hardware, this RFC proposes a
> virtual environment for testing PCI endpoint function drivers.
>
This sounds exciting to me and yes, it is going to be really helpful for
validating EP framework as a whole.
> # Architecture
> The overview of the architecture is as follows.
>
> Guest 1 Guest 2
> +-------------------------+ +----------------------------+
> | Linux kernel | | Linux kernel |
> | | | |
> | PCI EP function driver | | |
> | (e.g. pci-epf-test) | | |
> |-------------------------| | PCI Device Driver |
> | (2) QEMU EPC Driver | | (e.g. pci_endpoint_test) |
> +-------------------------+ +----------------------------+
> +-------------------------+ +----------------------------+
> | QEMU | | QEMU |
> |-------------------------| |----------------------------|
> | (1) QEMU PCI EPC Device *----* (3) QEMU EPF Bridge Device |
> +-------------------------+ +----------------------------+
>
> At present, it is designed to work guests only on the same host, and
> communication is done through Unix domain sockets.
>
> The three parts shown in the figure were introduced this time.
>
> (1) QEMU PCI Endpoint Controller(EPC) Device
> PCI Endpoint Controller implemented as QEMU PCI device.
> (2) QEMU PCI Endpoint Controller(EPC) Driver
> Linux kernel driver that drives the device (1). It registers a epc device
> to linux kernel and handling each operations for the epc device.
> (3) QEMU PCI Endpoint function(EPF) Bridge Device
> QEMU PCI device that cooperates with (1) and performs accesses to pci
> configuration space, BAR and memory space to communicate each guests, and
> generates interruptions to the guest 1.
>
I'm not very familiar with Qemu, but why can't the existing Qemu PCIe host
controller devices used for EP communication? I mean, what is the need for a
dedicated EPF bridge device (3) in host? (Guest 2 as per your diagram).
Is that because you use socket communication between EP and host?
- Mani
> Each projects are:
> (1), (3) https://github.com/ShunsukeMie/qemu/tree/epf-bridge/v1
> files: hw/misc/{qemu-epc.{c,h}, epf-bridge.c}
> (2) https://github.com/ShunsukeMie/linux-virtio-rdma/tree/qemu-epc
> files: drivers/pci/controller/pcie-qemu-ep.c
>
> # Protocol
>
> PCI, PCIe has a layer structure that includes Physical, Data Lane and
> Transaction. The communicates between the bridge(3) and controller (1)
> mimic the Transaction. Specifically, a protocol is implemented for
> exchanging fd for communication protocol version check and communication,
> in addition to the interaction equivalent to PCIe Transaction Layer Packet
> (Read and Write of I/O, Memory, Configuration space and Message). In my
> mind, we need to discuss the communication mor.
>
> We also are planning to post the patch set after the code is organized and
> the protocol discussion is matured.
>
> Best regards,
> Shunsuke
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 13:46 [RFC] Proposal of QEMU PCI Endpoint test environment Shunsuke Mie
2023-08-23 6:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-08-25 8:56 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-09-21 9:11 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2023-09-26 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-09-26 9:47 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-09-26 12:40 ` Vaishnav Achath
2023-10-03 4:56 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-10-03 14:31 ` Jiri Kastner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-04 7:36 Mattias Nissler
2023-10-05 1:31 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-10-05 7:02 ` Mattias Nissler
2023-10-06 11:51 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-10-06 12:00 ` Mattias Nissler
2023-10-06 12:07 ` Thanos Makatos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230823060923.GA3737@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mie@igel.co.jp \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).