[PATCH v9 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG

[PATCH v9 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Hi,

This new version contains suggestions made by Andrew Jones in v8.

Most notable change is the removal of the opensbi.py test in patch 11,
which was replaced by a TuxBoot test. It's more suitable to test the
integrity of all the extensions enabled by the 'max' CPU.

The series is available in this branch:

https://gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/-/tree/max_cpu_user_choice_v9

Patches missing acks: 11, 15

Changes from v8:
- patch 7:
  - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
- patch 8:
  - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
- patch 11:
  - removed both opensbi.py tests
  - added 2 'max' cpu tuxboot tests in tuxrun_baselines.py
- patch 12:
  - fixed typos in deprecated.rst
- patch 15:
  - use g_assert_not_reached() at the end of cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version()
- patch 19:
  - added comment on top of riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() explaining why
    we're not implementing user choice support for MISA properties
- patch 20:
  - warn_report() is now called after the G error conditions
- v8 link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20230824221440.484675-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/



Daniel Henrique Barboza (20):
  target/riscv/cpu.c: split CPU options from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
  target/riscv/cpu.c: skip 'bool' check when filtering KVM props
  target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper
  target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]
  target/riscv/cpu.c: split non-ratified exts from
    riscv_cpu_extensions[]
  target/riscv/cpu.c: split vendor exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
  target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
  target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
  target/riscv/cpu.c: limit cfg->vext_spec log message
  target/riscv: add 'max' CPU type
  avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU
  target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type
  target/riscv/cpu.c: use offset in isa_ext_is_enabled/update_enabled
  target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public
  target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
  target/riscv/cpu.c: use cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() during realize()
  target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig
  target/riscv: use isa_ext_update_enabled() in
    init_max_cpu_extensions()
  target/riscv/cpu.c: honor user choice in cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
  target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG

 docs/about/deprecated.rst         |  12 +
 target/riscv/cpu-qom.h            |   1 +
 target/riscv/cpu.c                | 564 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 target/riscv/cpu.h                |   2 +
 target/riscv/kvm.c                |   8 +-
 tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py |  32 ++
 6 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)

-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 01/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: split CPU options from riscv_cpu_extensions[]

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

We'll add a new CPU type that will enable a considerable amount of
extensions. To make it easier for us we'll do a few cleanups in our
existing riscv_cpu_extensions[] array.

Start by splitting all CPU non-boolean options from it. Create a new
riscv_cpu_options[] array for them. Add all these properties in
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() as it is already being done today.

'mmu' and 'pmp' aren't really extensions in the usual way we think about
RISC-V extensions. These are closer to CPU features/options, so move
both to riscv_cpu_options[] too. In the near future we'll need to match
all extensions with all entries in isa_edata_arr[], and so it happens
that both 'mmu' and 'pmp' do not have a riscv,isa string (thus, no priv
spec version restriction). This further emphasizes the point that these
are more a CPU option than an extension.

No functional changes made.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index f227c7664e..fdbd8eb0b8 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1810,7 +1810,6 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
 
 static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     /* Defaults for standard extensions */
-    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("pmu-num", RISCVCPU, cfg.pmu_num, 16),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("sscofpmf", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_sscofpmf, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zifencei", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_ifencei, true),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zicsr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icsr, true),
@@ -1823,15 +1822,8 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve32f", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve32f, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve64f", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve64f, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve64d", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve64d, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("mmu", RISCVCPU, cfg.mmu, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("pmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.pmp, true),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("sstc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_sstc, true),
 
-    DEFINE_PROP_STRING("priv_spec", RISCVCPU, cfg.priv_spec),
-    DEFINE_PROP_STRING("vext_spec", RISCVCPU, cfg.vext_spec),
-    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("vlen", RISCVCPU, cfg.vlen, 128),
-    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("elen", RISCVCPU, cfg.elen, 64),
-
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("smstateen", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smstateen, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svadu", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svadu, true),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svinval", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svinval, false),
@@ -1862,9 +1854,7 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zhinxmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zhinxmin, false),
 
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zicbom", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icbom, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cbom_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cbom_blocksize, 64),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zicboz", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icboz, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cboz_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cboz_blocksize, 64),
 
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zmmul", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zmmul, false),
 
@@ -1918,6 +1908,21 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
+static Property riscv_cpu_options[] = {
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("pmu-num", RISCVCPU, cfg.pmu_num, 16),
+
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("mmu", RISCVCPU, cfg.mmu, true),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("pmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.pmp, true),
+
+    DEFINE_PROP_STRING("priv_spec", RISCVCPU, cfg.priv_spec),
+    DEFINE_PROP_STRING("vext_spec", RISCVCPU, cfg.vext_spec),
+
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("vlen", RISCVCPU, cfg.vlen, 128),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("elen", RISCVCPU, cfg.elen, 64),
+
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cbom_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cbom_blocksize, 64),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cboz_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cboz_blocksize, 64),
+};
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
@@ -1986,6 +1991,14 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
 #endif
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
+        /* Check if KVM created the property already */
+        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
+    }
 }
 
 static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 02/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: skip 'bool' check when filtering KVM props

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

After the introduction of riscv_cpu_options[] all properties in
riscv_cpu_extensions[] are booleans. This check is now obsolete.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index fdbd8eb0b8..db640e7460 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1976,17 +1976,11 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
              * Set the default to disabled for every extension
              * unknown to KVM and error out if the user attempts
              * to enable any of them.
-             *
-             * We're giving a pass for non-bool properties since they're
-             * not related to the availability of extensions and can be
-             * safely ignored as is.
              */
-            if (prop->info == &qdev_prop_bool) {
-                object_property_add(obj, prop->name, "bool",
-                                    NULL, cpu_set_cfg_unavailable,
-                                    NULL, (void *)prop->name);
-                continue;
-            }
+            object_property_add(obj, prop->name, "bool",
+                                NULL, cpu_set_cfg_unavailable,
+                                NULL, (void *)prop->name);
+            continue;
         }
 #endif
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 03/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Future patches will split the existing Property arrays even further, and
the existing code in riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() will start to scale
bad with it because it's dealing with KVM constraints mixed in with TCG
constraints. We're going to pay a high price to share a couple of common
lines of code between the two.

Create a new riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() that will be forked from
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() if we're running KVM. The helper
includes all properties that a KVM CPU will add. The rest of
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() body will then be relieved from having
to deal with KVM constraints.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index db640e7460..8e6d316500 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1943,6 +1943,46 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
 }
 #endif
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
+{
+    /* Check if KVM created the property already */
+    if (object_property_find(obj, prop_name)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * Set the default to disabled for every extension
+     * unknown to KVM and error out if the user attempts
+     * to enable any of them.
+     */
+    object_property_add(obj, prop_name, "bool",
+                        NULL, cpu_set_cfg_unavailable,
+                        NULL, (void *)prop_name);
+}
+
+static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
+{
+    Property *prop;
+    DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
+
+    kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
+    riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
+
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
+    }
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
+        /* Check if KVM created the property already */
+        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
+    }
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Add CPU properties with user-facing flags.
  *
@@ -1958,39 +1998,18 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
     riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
 
     if (kvm_enabled()) {
-        kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
+        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(obj);
+        return;
     }
 #endif
 
     riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
 
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
-        if (kvm_enabled()) {
-            /* Check if KVM created the property already */
-            if (object_property_find(obj, prop->name)) {
-                continue;
-            }
-
-            /*
-             * Set the default to disabled for every extension
-             * unknown to KVM and error out if the user attempts
-             * to enable any of them.
-             */
-            object_property_add(obj, prop->name, "bool",
-                                NULL, cpu_set_cfg_unavailable,
-                                NULL, (void *)prop->name);
-            continue;
-        }
-#endif
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
 
     for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
-        /* Check if KVM created the property already */
-        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
-            continue;
-        }
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
     }
 }
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 03/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Alistair, Phil,


On 9/1/23 16:46, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Future patches will split the existing Property arrays even further, and
> the existing code in riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() will start to scale
> bad with it because it's dealing with KVM constraints mixed in with TCG
> constraints. We're going to pay a high price to share a couple of common
> lines of code between the two.
> 
> Create a new riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() that will be forked from
> riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() if we're running KVM. The helper
> includes all properties that a KVM CPU will add. The rest of
> riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() body will then be relieved from having
> to deal with KVM constraints.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   target/riscv/cpu.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index db640e7460..8e6d316500 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1943,6 +1943,46 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY

As said by Phil in the PR this should be 'CONFIG_KVM', but that's not enough to fix the
CI problem that was reported by Stefan.

The problem appears with --enable-debug because the compiler can't eliminate the
function call down there:

> +static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
> +{
> +    /* Check if KVM created the property already */
> +    if (object_property_find(obj, prop_name)) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Set the default to disabled for every extension
> +     * unknown to KVM and error out if the user attempts
> +     * to enable any of them.
> +     */
> +    object_property_add(obj, prop_name, "bool",
> +                        NULL, cpu_set_cfg_unavailable,
> +                        NULL, (void *)prop_name);
> +}
> +
> +static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
> +{
> +    Property *prop;
> +    DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
> +
> +    kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
> +    riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
> +
> +    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> +        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
> +    }
> +
> +    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
> +        /* Check if KVM created the property already */
> +        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
> +    }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   /*
>    * Add CPU properties with user-facing flags.
>    *
> @@ -1958,39 +1998,18 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
>       riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
>   
>       if (kvm_enabled()) {
> -        kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
> +        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(obj);
> +        return;

^ here. The reason is that riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() will be unused after that, and
the compiler will then refuse to crop the block.

I fixed it by changing the ifdef to 'CONFIG_KVM' and also by adding it kvm_riscv.h:

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 8e6d316500..7b7c5649e7 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1924,7 +1924,7 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_options[] = {
      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cboz_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cboz_blocksize, 64),
  };
  
-#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
  static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
                                      const char *name,
                                      void *opaque, Error **errp)
@@ -1941,9 +1941,7 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
                     propname);
      }
  }
-#endif
  
-#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
  static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
      /* Check if KVM created the property already */
@@ -1961,7 +1959,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
                          NULL, (void *)prop_name);
  }
  
-static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
+void kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
  {
      Property *prop;
      DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
@@ -1998,7 +1996,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
      riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
  
      if (kvm_enabled()) {
-        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(obj);
+        kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(obj);
          return;
      }
  #endif
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h b/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h
index de8c209ebc..69e807fbfb 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm_riscv.h
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
  #ifndef QEMU_KVM_RISCV_H
  #define QEMU_KVM_RISCV_H
  
+/* Temporarily implemented in cpu.c */
+void kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj);
+
  void kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(Object *cpu_obj);
  void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(RISCVCPU *cpu);
  void kvm_riscv_set_irq(RISCVCPU *cpu, int irq, int level);


I'm aware that it's not ideal to have a kvm_riscv.h function implemented in cpu.c,
but we will only be able to move it to kvm.c when the extension arrays are being
exported later on.


This should fix the CI problem. I say 'should' because the CI job that is breaking
for Stefan is one of the custom jobs that I'm not able to run by default (not sure if
they're run only before merging to master ...).


Thanks,


Daniel





>       }
>   #endif
>   
>       riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
>   
>       for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> -        if (kvm_enabled()) {
> -            /* Check if KVM created the property already */
> -            if (object_property_find(obj, prop->name)) {
> -                continue;
> -            }
> -
> -            /*
> -             * Set the default to disabled for every extension
> -             * unknown to KVM and error out if the user attempts
> -             * to enable any of them.
> -             */
> -            object_property_add(obj, prop->name, "bool",
> -                                NULL, cpu_set_cfg_unavailable,
> -                                NULL, (void *)prop->name);
> -            continue;
> -        }
> -#endif
>           qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
>       }
>   
>       for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
> -        /* Check if KVM created the property already */
> -        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
> -            continue;
> -        }
>           qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
>       }
>   }

[PATCH v9 04/20] target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() and eliminate the ARRAY_SIZE() usage when
iterating in the riscv_cpu_options[] array, making it similar to what
we already do when working with riscv_cpu_extensions[].

We also have a more sophisticated motivation behind this change. In the
future we might need to export riscv_cpu_options[] to other files, and
ARRAY_LIST() doesn't work properly in that case because the array size
isn't exposed to the header file. Here's a future sight of what we would
deal with:

./target/riscv/kvm.c:1057:5: error: nested extern declaration of 'riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties' [-Werror=nested-externs]
n file included from ../target/riscv/kvm.c:19:
home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
 473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
     |                               ^
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
1047 |         for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
     |                             ^~~~~~~~~~
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1059:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY'
1059 |     ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
     |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
 473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
     |                               ^
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
1047 |         for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \

Homogenize the present and change the future by using
DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() in riscv_cpu_options[].

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 8e6d316500..8662414906 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1922,6 +1922,8 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_options[] = {
 
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cbom_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cbom_blocksize, 64),
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cboz_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cboz_blocksize, 64),
+
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
@@ -1973,12 +1975,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
         riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
     }
 
-    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         /* Check if KVM created the property already */
-        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
+        if (object_property_find(obj, prop->name)) {
             continue;
         }
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
 }
 #endif
@@ -2009,8 +2011,8 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
 
-    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 04/20] target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:50 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() and eliminate the ARRAY_SIZE() usage when
> iterating in the riscv_cpu_options[] array, making it similar to what
> we already do when working with riscv_cpu_extensions[].
>
> We also have a more sophisticated motivation behind this change. In the
> future we might need to export riscv_cpu_options[] to other files, and
> ARRAY_LIST() doesn't work properly in that case because the array size
> isn't exposed to the header file. Here's a future sight of what we would
> deal with:
>
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1057:5: error: nested extern declaration of 'riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties' [-Werror=nested-externs]
> n file included from ../target/riscv/kvm.c:19:
> home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
>  473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
>      |                               ^
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
> 1047 |         for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
>      |                             ^~~~~~~~~~
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1059:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY'
> 1059 |     ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
>      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
>  473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
>      |                               ^
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
> 1047 |         for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
>
> Homogenize the present and change the future by using
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() in riscv_cpu_options[].
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 8e6d316500..8662414906 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1922,6 +1922,8 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_options[] = {
>
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cbom_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cbom_blocksize, 64),
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("cboz_blocksize", RISCVCPU, cfg.cboz_blocksize, 64),
> +
> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> @@ -1973,12 +1975,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
>          riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
>      }
>
> -    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
> +    for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
>          /* Check if KVM created the property already */
> -        if (object_property_find(obj, riscv_cpu_options[i].name)) {
> +        if (object_property_find(obj, prop->name)) {
>              continue;
>          }
> -        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
> +        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
>      }
>  }
>  #endif
> @@ -2009,8 +2011,8 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
>          qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
>      }
>
> -    for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_cpu_options); i++) {
> -        qdev_property_add_static(dev, &riscv_cpu_options[i]);
> +    for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> +        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
>      }
>  }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

Re: [PATCH v9 04/20] target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 1/9/23 21:46, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() and eliminate the ARRAY_SIZE() usage when
> iterating in the riscv_cpu_options[] array, making it similar to what
> we already do when working with riscv_cpu_extensions[].
> 
> We also have a more sophisticated motivation behind this change. In the
> future we might need to export riscv_cpu_options[] to other files, and
> ARRAY_LIST() doesn't work properly in that case because the array size
> isn't exposed to the header file. Here's a future sight of what we would
> deal with:
> 
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1057:5: error: nested extern declaration of 'riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties' [-Werror=nested-externs]
> n file included from ../target/riscv/kvm.c:19:
> home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
>   473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
>       |                               ^
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
> 1047 |         for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
>       |                             ^~~~~~~~~~
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1059:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY'
> 1059 |     ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
>   473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
>       |                               ^
> ./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
> 1047 |         for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
> 
> Homogenize the present and change the future by using
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() in riscv_cpu_options[].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   target/riscv/cpu.c | 12 +++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

[PATCH v9 05/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: split non-ratified exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Create a new riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] to store the non-ratified
extensions properties. Once they are ratified we'll move them back to
riscv_cpu_extensions[].

riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() are
changed to keep adding non-ratified properties to users.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 8662414906..2349f813e4 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1881,8 +1881,11 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadsync", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadsync, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xventanacondops", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_XVentanaCondOps, false),
 
-    /* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
+};
 
+/* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */
+static Property riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] = {
     /* ePMP 0.9.3 */
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-smaia", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smaia, false),
@@ -1975,6 +1978,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
         riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
     }
 
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
+    }
+
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         /* Check if KVM created the property already */
         if (object_property_find(obj, prop->name)) {
@@ -2014,6 +2021,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
+
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
+    }
 }
 
 static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 06/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: split vendor exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Our goal is to make riscv_cpu_extensions[] hold only ratified,
non-vendor extensions.

Create a new riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[] array for them, changing
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties()
accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 2349f813e4..86d536f242 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1867,7 +1867,10 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmt, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zicond", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zicond, false),
 
-    /* Vendor-specific custom extensions */
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
+};
+
+static Property riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadba, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadbb, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadbs, false),
@@ -1978,6 +1981,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
         riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
     }
 
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_vendor_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
+    }
+
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
     }
@@ -2022,6 +2029,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
 
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_vendor_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
+    }
+
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
     }
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 07/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

The code inside riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() became quite repetitive
after recent changes. Add a helper to hide the repetition away.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 86d536f242..d484d63bcd 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1951,6 +1951,15 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
 }
 #endif
 
+static void riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(DeviceState *dev, Property *array)
+{
+    g_assert(array);
+
+    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
+    }
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
 {
@@ -2007,7 +2016,6 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
  */
 static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
 {
-    Property *prop;
     DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
@@ -2021,21 +2029,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
 
     riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
 
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
-    }
-
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
-    }
-
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_vendor_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
-    }
-
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
-    }
+    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_extensions);
+    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_options);
+    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
+    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
 }
 
 static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 07/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:49 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> The code inside riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() became quite repetitive
> after recent changes. Add a helper to hide the repetition away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 86d536f242..d484d63bcd 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1951,6 +1951,15 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
>  }
>  #endif
>
> +static void riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(DeviceState *dev, Property *array)
> +{
> +    g_assert(array);
> +
> +    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> +        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
>  {
> @@ -2007,7 +2016,6 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
>   */
>  static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
>  {
> -    Property *prop;
>      DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
>
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> @@ -2021,21 +2029,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
>
>      riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
>
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
> -    }
> -
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
> -    }
> -
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_vendor_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
> -    }
> -
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
> -    }
> +    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_extensions);
> +    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_options);
> +    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
> +    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
>  }
>
>  static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

Re: [PATCH v9 07/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 1/9/23 21:46, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The code inside riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() became quite repetitive
> after recent changes. Add a helper to hide the repetition away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   target/riscv/cpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 86d536f242..d484d63bcd 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1951,6 +1951,15 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> +static void riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(DeviceState *dev, Property *array)
> +{
> +    g_assert(array);
> +
> +    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> +        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
> +    }
> +}

Worth a qdev_property_add_static_array() in "hw/qdev-properties.h".

Please do if a v10 is requested, otherwise can be done later. In any
case:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

[PATCH v9 08/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Use a helper in riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() to eliminate some of its
code repetition.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index d484d63bcd..8cd19a9b9c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1978,6 +1978,16 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
                         NULL, (void *)prop_name);
 }
 
+static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(Object *obj,
+                                                 Property *array)
+{
+    g_assert(array);
+
+    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
+    }
+}
+
 static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
 {
     Property *prop;
@@ -1986,17 +1996,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
     kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
     riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
 
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
-    }
-
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_vendor_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
-    }
-
-    for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
-    }
+    riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
+    riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
+    riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
 
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         /* Check if KVM created the property already */
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 08/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:50 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Use a helper in riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() to eliminate some of its
> code repetition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index d484d63bcd..8cd19a9b9c 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1978,6 +1978,16 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
>                          NULL, (void *)prop_name);
>  }
>
> +static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(Object *obj,
> +                                                 Property *array)
> +{
> +    g_assert(array);
> +
> +    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> +        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
>  {
>      Property *prop;
> @@ -1986,17 +1996,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
>      kvm_riscv_init_user_properties(obj);
>      riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
>
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
> -    }
> -
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_vendor_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
> -    }
> -
> -    for (prop = riscv_cpu_experimental_exts; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
> -        riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
> -    }
> +    riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
> +    riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
> +    riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
>
>      for (prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
>          /* Check if KVM created the property already */
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

[PATCH v9 09/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: limit cfg->vext_spec log message

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Inside riscv_cpu_validate_v() we're always throwing a log message if the
user didn't set a vector version via 'vext_spec'.

We're going to include one case with the 'max' CPU where env->vext_ver
will be set in the cpu_init(). But that alone will not stop the "vector
version is not specified" message from appearing. The usefulness of this
log message is debatable for the generic CPUs, but for a 'max' CPU type,
where we are supposed to deliver a CPU model with all features possible,
it's strange to force users to set 'vext_spec' to get rid of this
message.

Change riscv_cpu_validate_v() to not throw this log message if
env->vext_ver is already set.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 8cd19a9b9c..3ba92c806b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -959,8 +959,6 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disas_set_info(CPUState *s, disassemble_info *info)
 static void riscv_cpu_validate_v(CPURISCVState *env, RISCVCPUConfig *cfg,
                                  Error **errp)
 {
-    int vext_version = VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0;
-
     if (!is_power_of_2(cfg->vlen)) {
         error_setg(errp, "Vector extension VLEN must be power of 2");
         return;
@@ -983,17 +981,18 @@ static void riscv_cpu_validate_v(CPURISCVState *env, RISCVCPUConfig *cfg,
     }
     if (cfg->vext_spec) {
         if (!g_strcmp0(cfg->vext_spec, "v1.0")) {
-            vext_version = VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0;
+            env->vext_ver = VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0;
         } else {
             error_setg(errp, "Unsupported vector spec version '%s'",
                        cfg->vext_spec);
             return;
         }
-    } else {
+    } else if (env->vext_ver == 0) {
         qemu_log("vector version is not specified, "
                  "use the default value v1.0\n");
+
+        env->vext_ver = VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0;
     }
-    env->vext_ver = vext_version;
 }
 
 static void riscv_cpu_validate_priv_spec(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 10/20] target/riscv: add 'max' CPU type

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

The 'max' CPU type is used by tooling to determine what's the most
capable CPU a current QEMU version implements. Other archs such as ARM
implements this type. Let's add it to RISC-V.

What we consider "most capable CPU" in this context are related to
ratified, non-vendor extensions. This means that we want the 'max' CPU
to enable all (possible) ratified extensions by default. The reasoning
behind this design is (1) vendor extensions can conflict with each other
and we won't play favorities deciding which one is default or not and
(2) non-ratified extensions are always prone to changes, not being
stable enough to be enabled by default.

All this said, we're still not able to enable all ratified extensions
due to conflicts between them. Zfinx and all its dependencies aren't
enabled because of a conflict with RVF. zce, zcmp and zcmt are also
disabled due to RVD conflicts. When running with 64 bits we're also
disabling zcf.

MISA bits RVG, RVJ and RVV are also being set manually since they're
default disabled.

This is the resulting 'riscv,isa' DT for this new CPU:

rv64imafdcvh_zicbom_zicboz_zicsr_zifencei_zihintpause_zawrs_zfa_
zfh_zfhmin_zca_zcb_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zbs_zk_zkn_zknd_
zkne_zknh_zkr_zks_zksed_zksh_zkt_zve32f_zve64f_zve64d_
smstateen_sscofpmf_sstc_svadu_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu-qom.h |  1 +
 target/riscv/cpu.c     | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
index 04af50983e..f3fbe37a2c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu-qom.h
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #define CPU_RESOLVING_TYPE TYPE_RISCV_CPU
 
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY              RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("any")
+#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_MAX              RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("max")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv32")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv64")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128          RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("x-rv128")
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 3ba92c806b..365c2b3b56 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ static const char * const riscv_intr_names[] = {
 };
 
 static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj);
+static void riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions(Object *obj);
 
 const char *riscv_cpu_get_trap_name(target_ulong cause, bool async)
 {
@@ -396,6 +397,25 @@ static void riscv_any_cpu_init(Object *obj)
     cpu->cfg.pmp = true;
 }
 
+static void riscv_max_cpu_init(Object *obj)
+{
+    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
+    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
+    RISCVMXL mlx = MXL_RV64;
+
+#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
+    mlx = MXL_RV32;
+#endif
+    set_misa(env, mlx, 0);
+    riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(obj);
+    riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions(obj);
+    env->priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_LATEST;
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    set_satp_mode_max_supported(RISCV_CPU(obj), mlx == MXL_RV32 ?
+                                VM_1_10_SV32 : VM_1_10_SV57);
+#endif
+}
+
 #if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
 static void rv64_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
 {
@@ -2036,6 +2056,41 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
     riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
 }
 
+/*
+ * The 'max' type CPU will have all possible ratified
+ * non-vendor extensions enabled.
+ */
+static void riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions(Object *obj)
+{
+    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
+    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
+    Property *prop;
+
+    /* Enable RVG, RVJ and RVV that are disabled by default */
+    set_misa(env, env->misa_mxl, env->misa_ext | RVG | RVJ | RVV);
+
+    for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        object_property_set_bool(obj, prop->name, true, NULL);
+    }
+
+    /* set vector version */
+    env->vext_ver = VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0;
+
+    /* Zfinx is not compatible with F. Disable it */
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zfinx", false, NULL);
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zdinx", false, NULL);
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zhinx", false, NULL);
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zhinxmin", false, NULL);
+
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zce", false, NULL);
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zcmp", false, NULL);
+    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zcmt", false, NULL);
+
+    if (env->misa_mxl != MXL_RV32) {
+        object_property_set_bool(obj, "zcf", false, NULL);
+    }
+}
+
 static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("debug", RISCVCPU, cfg.debug, true),
 
@@ -2374,6 +2429,7 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
         .abstract = true,
     },
     DEFINE_DYNAMIC_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY,      riscv_any_cpu_init),
+    DEFINE_DYNAMIC_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_MAX,      riscv_max_cpu_init),
 #if defined(CONFIG_KVM)
     DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_HOST,             riscv_host_cpu_init),
 #endif
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 11/20] avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Add smoke tests to ensure that we'll not break the 'max' CPU type when
adding new frozen/ratified RISC-V extensions.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
---
 tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
index e12250eabb..c99bea6c0b 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
@@ -501,6 +501,38 @@ def test_riscv64(self):
 
         self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
 
+    def test_riscv32_maxcpu(self):
+        """
+        :avocado: tags=arch:riscv32
+        :avocado: tags=machine:virt
+        :avocado: tags=cpu:max
+        :avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv32
+        """
+        sums = { "Image" :
+                 "89599407d7334de629a40e7ad6503c73670359eb5f5ae9d686353a3d6deccbd5",
+                 "fw_jump.elf" :
+                 "f2ef28a0b77826f79d085d3e4aa686f1159b315eff9099a37046b18936676985",
+                 "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
+                 "7168d296d0283238ea73cd5a775b3dd608e55e04c7b92b76ecce31bb13108cba" }
+
+        self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
+
+    def test_riscv64_maxcpu(self):
+        """
+        :avocado: tags=arch:riscv64
+        :avocado: tags=machine:virt
+        :avocado: tags=cpu:max
+        :avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv64
+        """
+        sums = { "Image" :
+                 "cd634badc65e52fb63465ec99e309c0de0369f0841b7d9486f9729e119bac25e",
+                 "fw_jump.elf" :
+                 "6e3373abcab4305fe151b564a4c71110d833c21f2c0a1753b7935459e36aedcf",
+                 "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
+                 "b18e3a3bdf27be03da0b285e84cb71bf09eca071c3a087b42884b6982ed679eb" }
+
+        self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
+
     def test_s390(self):
         """
         :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 11/20] avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 1/9/23 21:46, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Add smoke tests to ensure that we'll not break the 'max' CPU type when
> adding new frozen/ratified RISC-V extensions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH v9 11/20] avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:51 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Add smoke tests to ensure that we'll not break the 'max' CPU type when
> adding new frozen/ratified RISC-V extensions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
> index e12250eabb..c99bea6c0b 100644
> --- a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
> +++ b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
> @@ -501,6 +501,38 @@ def test_riscv64(self):
>
>          self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
>
> +    def test_riscv32_maxcpu(self):
> +        """
> +        :avocado: tags=arch:riscv32
> +        :avocado: tags=machine:virt
> +        :avocado: tags=cpu:max
> +        :avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv32
> +        """
> +        sums = { "Image" :
> +                 "89599407d7334de629a40e7ad6503c73670359eb5f5ae9d686353a3d6deccbd5",
> +                 "fw_jump.elf" :
> +                 "f2ef28a0b77826f79d085d3e4aa686f1159b315eff9099a37046b18936676985",
> +                 "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
> +                 "7168d296d0283238ea73cd5a775b3dd608e55e04c7b92b76ecce31bb13108cba" }
> +
> +        self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
> +
> +    def test_riscv64_maxcpu(self):
> +        """
> +        :avocado: tags=arch:riscv64
> +        :avocado: tags=machine:virt
> +        :avocado: tags=cpu:max
> +        :avocado: tags=tuxboot:riscv64
> +        """
> +        sums = { "Image" :
> +                 "cd634badc65e52fb63465ec99e309c0de0369f0841b7d9486f9729e119bac25e",
> +                 "fw_jump.elf" :
> +                 "6e3373abcab4305fe151b564a4c71110d833c21f2c0a1753b7935459e36aedcf",
> +                 "rootfs.ext4.zst" :
> +                 "b18e3a3bdf27be03da0b285e84cb71bf09eca071c3a087b42884b6982ed679eb" }
> +
> +        self.common_tuxrun(csums=sums)
> +
>      def test_s390(self):
>          """
>          :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

[PATCH v9 12/20] target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

The 'any' CPU type was introduced in commit dc5bd18fa5725 ("RISC-V CPU
Core Definition"), being around since the beginning. It's not an easy
CPU to use: it's undocumented and its name doesn't tell users much about
what the CPU is supposed to bring. 'git log' doesn't help us either in
knowing what was the original design of this CPU type.

The closest we have is a comment from Alistair [1] where he recalls from
memory that the 'any' CPU is supposed to behave like the newly added
'max' CPU. He also suggested that the 'any' CPU should be removed.

The default CPUs are rv32 and rv64, so removing the 'any' CPU will have
impact only on users that might have a script that uses '-cpu any'.
And those users are better off using the default CPUs or the new 'max'
CPU.

We would love to just remove the code and be done with it, but one does
not simply remove a feature in QEMU. We'll put the CPU in quarantine
first, letting users know that we have the intent of removing it in the
future.

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg02891.html

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 docs/about/deprecated.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
 target/riscv/cpu.c        |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 92a2bafd2b..7277d4e8a4 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -371,6 +371,18 @@ QEMU's ``vhost`` feature, which would eliminate the high latency costs under
 which the 9p ``proxy`` backend currently suffers. However as of to date nobody
 has indicated plans for such kind of reimplementation unfortunately.
 
+RISC-V 'any' CPU type ``-cpu any`` (since 8.2)
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+The 'any' CPU type was introduced back in 2018 and has been around since the
+initial RISC-V QEMU port. Its usage has always been unclear: users don't know
+what to expect from a CPU called 'any', and in fact the CPU does not do anything
+special that isn't already done by the default CPUs rv32/rv64.
+
+After the introduction of the 'max' CPU type, RISC-V now has a good coverage
+of generic CPUs: rv32 and rv64 as default CPUs and 'max' as a feature complete
+CPU for both 32 and 64 bit builds. Users are then discouraged to use the 'any'
+CPU type starting in 8.2.
 
 Block device options
 ''''''''''''''''''''
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 365c2b3b56..0dae259e02 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1522,6 +1522,11 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     RISCVCPUClass *mcc = RISCV_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
     Error *local_err = NULL;
 
+    if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY) != NULL) {
+        warn_report("The 'any' CPU is deprecated and will be "
+                    "removed in the future.");
+    }
+
     cpu_exec_realizefn(cs, &local_err);
     if (local_err != NULL) {
         error_propagate(errp, local_err);
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 12/20] target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 1/9/23 21:46, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The 'any' CPU type was introduced in commit dc5bd18fa5725 ("RISC-V CPU
> Core Definition"), being around since the beginning. It's not an easy
> CPU to use: it's undocumented and its name doesn't tell users much about
> what the CPU is supposed to bring. 'git log' doesn't help us either in
> knowing what was the original design of this CPU type.
> 
> The closest we have is a comment from Alistair [1] where he recalls from
> memory that the 'any' CPU is supposed to behave like the newly added
> 'max' CPU. He also suggested that the 'any' CPU should be removed.
> 
> The default CPUs are rv32 and rv64, so removing the 'any' CPU will have
> impact only on users that might have a script that uses '-cpu any'.
> And those users are better off using the default CPUs or the new 'max'
> CPU.
> 
> We would love to just remove the code and be done with it, but one does
> not simply remove a feature in QEMU. We'll put the CPU in quarantine
> first, letting users know that we have the intent of removing it in the
> future.
> 
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg02891.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   docs/about/deprecated.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
>   target/riscv/cpu.c        |  5 +++++
>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

[PATCH v9 13/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: use offset in isa_ext_is_enabled/update_enabled

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

We'll have future usage for a function where, given an offset of the
struct RISCVCPUConfig, the flag is updated to a certain val.

Change all existing callers to use edata->ext_enable_offset instead of
'edata'.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 0dae259e02..03e936348a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -162,18 +162,17 @@ static const struct isa_ext_data isa_edata_arr[] = {
     ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xventanacondops, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_XVentanaCondOps),
 };
 
-static bool isa_ext_is_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu,
-                               const struct isa_ext_data *edata)
+static bool isa_ext_is_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset)
 {
-    bool *ext_enabled = (void *)&cpu->cfg + edata->ext_enable_offset;
+    bool *ext_enabled = (void *)&cpu->cfg + ext_offset;
 
     return *ext_enabled;
 }
 
-static void isa_ext_update_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu,
-                                   const struct isa_ext_data *edata, bool en)
+static void isa_ext_update_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
+                                   bool en)
 {
-    bool *ext_enabled = (void *)&cpu->cfg + edata->ext_enable_offset;
+    bool *ext_enabled = (void *)&cpu->cfg + ext_offset;
 
     *ext_enabled = en;
 }
@@ -1045,9 +1044,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disable_priv_spec_isa_exts(RISCVCPU *cpu)
 
     /* Force disable extensions if priv spec version does not match */
     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(isa_edata_arr); i++) {
-        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, &isa_edata_arr[i]) &&
+        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, isa_edata_arr[i].ext_enable_offset) &&
             (env->priv_ver < isa_edata_arr[i].min_version)) {
-            isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, &isa_edata_arr[i], false);
+            isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, isa_edata_arr[i].ext_enable_offset,
+                                   false);
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
             warn_report("disabling %s extension for hart 0x" TARGET_FMT_lx
                         " because privilege spec version does not match",
@@ -2346,7 +2346,7 @@ static void riscv_isa_string_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, char **isa_str,
     int i;
 
     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(isa_edata_arr); i++) {
-        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, &isa_edata_arr[i])) {
+        if (isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, isa_edata_arr[i].ext_enable_offset)) {
             new = g_strconcat(old, "_", isa_edata_arr[i].name, NULL);
             g_free(old);
             old = new;
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 14/20] target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

The RISC-V KVM driver uses a CPUCFG() macro that calculates the offset
of a certain field in the struct RISCVCPUConfig. We're going to use this
macro in target/riscv/cpu.c as well in the next patches. Make it public.

Rename it to CPU_CFG_OFFSET() for more clarity while we're at it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 +-
 target/riscv/cpu.h | 2 ++
 target/riscv/kvm.c | 8 +++-----
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 03e936348a..43c68e1792 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct isa_ext_data {
 };
 
 #define ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(_name, _min_ver, _prop) \
-    {#_name, _min_ver, offsetof(struct RISCVCPUConfig, _prop)}
+    {#_name, _min_ver, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop)}
 
 /*
  * From vector_helper.c
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 6ea22e0eea..577abcd724 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@
 const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_name(uint32_t bit);
 const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_description(uint32_t bit);
 
+#define CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop) offsetof(struct RISCVCPUConfig, _prop)
+
 /* Privileged specification version */
 enum {
     PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0 = 0,
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm.c b/target/riscv/kvm.c
index c01cfb03f4..14763ec0cd 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm.c
@@ -205,10 +205,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_misa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
     }
 }
 
-#define CPUCFG(_prop) offsetof(struct RISCVCPUConfig, _prop)
-
 #define KVM_EXT_CFG(_name, _prop, _reg_id) \
-    {.name = _name, .offset = CPUCFG(_prop), \
+    {.name = _name, .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop), \
      .kvm_reg_id = _reg_id}
 
 static KVMCPUConfig kvm_multi_ext_cfgs[] = {
@@ -285,13 +283,13 @@ static void kvm_cpu_set_multi_ext_cfg(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
 
 static KVMCPUConfig kvm_cbom_blocksize = {
     .name = "cbom_blocksize",
-    .offset = CPUCFG(cbom_blocksize),
+    .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(cbom_blocksize),
     .kvm_reg_id = KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(zicbom_block_size)
 };
 
 static KVMCPUConfig kvm_cboz_blocksize = {
     .name = "cboz_blocksize",
-    .offset = CPUCFG(cboz_blocksize),
+    .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(cboz_blocksize),
     .kvm_reg_id = KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(zicboz_block_size)
 };
 
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 14/20] target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 1/9/23 21:46, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The RISC-V KVM driver uses a CPUCFG() macro that calculates the offset
> of a certain field in the struct RISCVCPUConfig. We're going to use this
> macro in target/riscv/cpu.c as well in the next patches. Make it public.
> 
> Rename it to CPU_CFG_OFFSET() for more clarity while we're at it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 +-
>   target/riscv/cpu.h | 2 ++
>   target/riscv/kvm.c | 8 +++-----
>   3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

[PATCH v9 15/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

During realize() time we're activating a lot of extensions based on some
criteria, e.g.:

    if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) {
        cpu->cfg.ext_zkn = true;
        cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
        cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
    }

This practice resulted in at least one case where we ended up enabling
something we shouldn't: RVC enabling zca/zcd/zcf when using a CPU that
has priv_spec older than 1.12.0.

We're also not considering user choice. There's no way of doing it now
but this is about to change in the next few patches.

cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() will check for priv version mismatches before
enabling extensions. If we have a mismatch between the current priv
version and the extension we want to enable, do not enable it. In the
near future, this same function will also consider user choice when
deciding if we're going to enable/disable an extension or not.

For now let's use it to handle zca/zcd/zcf enablement if RVC is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 43c68e1792..a4876df5f4 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -177,6 +177,43 @@ static void isa_ext_update_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
     *ext_enabled = en;
 }
 
+static int cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(uint32_t ext_offset)
+{
+    int i;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(isa_edata_arr); i++) {
+        if (isa_edata_arr[i].ext_enable_offset != ext_offset) {
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        return isa_edata_arr[i].min_version;
+    }
+
+    g_assert_not_reached();
+}
+
+static void cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
+                                    bool value)
+{
+    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
+    bool prev_val = isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, ext_offset);
+    int min_version;
+
+    if (prev_val == value) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if (value && env->priv_ver != PRIV_VERSION_LATEST) {
+        /* Do not enable it if priv_ver is older than min_version */
+        min_version = cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(ext_offset);
+        if (env->priv_ver < min_version) {
+            return;
+        }
+    }
+
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, ext_offset, value);
+}
+
 const char * const riscv_int_regnames[] = {
     "x0/zero", "x1/ra",  "x2/sp",  "x3/gp",  "x4/tp",  "x5/t0",   "x6/t1",
     "x7/t2",   "x8/s0",  "x9/s1",  "x10/a0", "x11/a1", "x12/a2",  "x13/a3",
@@ -1268,12 +1305,12 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
 
     /* zca, zcd and zcf has a PRIV 1.12.0 restriction */
     if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVC) && env->priv_ver >= PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zca = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zca), true);
         if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVF) && env->misa_mxl_max == MXL_RV32) {
-            cpu->cfg.ext_zcf = true;
+            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcf), true);
         }
         if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVD)) {
-            cpu->cfg.ext_zcd = true;
+            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcd), true);
         }
     }
 
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 15/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()

[Andrew Jones]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 04:46:21PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> During realize() time we're activating a lot of extensions based on some
> criteria, e.g.:
> 
>     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) {
>         cpu->cfg.ext_zkn = true;
>         cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
>         cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
>     }
> 
> This practice resulted in at least one case where we ended up enabling
> something we shouldn't: RVC enabling zca/zcd/zcf when using a CPU that
> has priv_spec older than 1.12.0.
> 
> We're also not considering user choice. There's no way of doing it now
> but this is about to change in the next few patches.
> 
> cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() will check for priv version mismatches before
> enabling extensions. If we have a mismatch between the current priv
> version and the extension we want to enable, do not enable it. In the
> near future, this same function will also consider user choice when
> deciding if we're going to enable/disable an extension or not.
> 
> For now let's use it to handle zca/zcd/zcf enablement if RVC is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Re: [PATCH v9 15/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:49 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> During realize() time we're activating a lot of extensions based on some
> criteria, e.g.:
>
>     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) {
>         cpu->cfg.ext_zkn = true;
>         cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
>         cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
>     }
>
> This practice resulted in at least one case where we ended up enabling
> something we shouldn't: RVC enabling zca/zcd/zcf when using a CPU that
> has priv_spec older than 1.12.0.
>
> We're also not considering user choice. There's no way of doing it now
> but this is about to change in the next few patches.
>
> cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() will check for priv version mismatches before
> enabling extensions. If we have a mismatch between the current priv
> version and the extension we want to enable, do not enable it. In the
> near future, this same function will also consider user choice when
> deciding if we're going to enable/disable an extension or not.
>
> For now let's use it to handle zca/zcd/zcf enablement if RVC is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Alistair

> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 43c68e1792..a4876df5f4 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,43 @@ static void isa_ext_update_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
>      *ext_enabled = en;
>  }
>
> +static int cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(uint32_t ext_offset)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(isa_edata_arr); i++) {
> +        if (isa_edata_arr[i].ext_enable_offset != ext_offset) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        return isa_edata_arr[i].min_version;
> +    }
> +
> +    g_assert_not_reached();
> +}
> +
> +static void cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
> +                                    bool value)
> +{
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    bool prev_val = isa_ext_is_enabled(cpu, ext_offset);
> +    int min_version;
> +
> +    if (prev_val == value) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (value && env->priv_ver != PRIV_VERSION_LATEST) {
> +        /* Do not enable it if priv_ver is older than min_version */
> +        min_version = cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(ext_offset);
> +        if (env->priv_ver < min_version) {
> +            return;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, ext_offset, value);
> +}
> +
>  const char * const riscv_int_regnames[] = {
>      "x0/zero", "x1/ra",  "x2/sp",  "x3/gp",  "x4/tp",  "x5/t0",   "x6/t1",
>      "x7/t2",   "x8/s0",  "x9/s1",  "x10/a0", "x11/a1", "x12/a2",  "x13/a3",
> @@ -1268,12 +1305,12 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>
>      /* zca, zcd and zcf has a PRIV 1.12.0 restriction */
>      if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVC) && env->priv_ver >= PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0) {
> -        cpu->cfg.ext_zca = true;
> +        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zca), true);
>          if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVF) && env->misa_mxl_max == MXL_RV32) {
> -            cpu->cfg.ext_zcf = true;
> +            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcf), true);
>          }
>          if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVD)) {
> -            cpu->cfg.ext_zcd = true;
> +            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcd), true);
>          }
>      }
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

[PATCH v9 16/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: use cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() during realize()

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Let's change the other instances in realize() where we're enabling an
extension based on a certain criteria (e.g. it's a dependency of another
extension).

We're leaving icsr and ifencei being enabled during RVG for later -
we'll want to error out in that case. Every other extension enablement
during realize is now done via cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update().

The end goal is that only cpu init() functions will handle extension
flags directly via "cpu->cfg.ext_N = true|false".

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index a4876df5f4..eeaf69599e 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zfh) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zfhmin = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zfhmin), true);
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zfhmin && !riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
@@ -1219,17 +1219,17 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
         }
 
         /* The V vector extension depends on the Zve64d extension */
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zve64d = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zve64d), true);
     }
 
     /* The Zve64d extension depends on the Zve64f extension */
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zve64d) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zve64f = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zve64f), true);
     }
 
     /* The Zve64f extension depends on the Zve32f extension */
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zve64f) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zve32f = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zve32f), true);
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zve64d && !riscv_has_ext(env, RVD)) {
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zvfh) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zvfhmin = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zvfhmin), true);
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zvfhmin && !cpu->cfg.ext_zve32f) {
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
 
     /* Set the ISA extensions, checks should have happened above */
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zhinx) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zhinxmin = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zca), true);
     }
 
     if ((cpu->cfg.ext_zdinx || cpu->cfg.ext_zhinxmin) && !cpu->cfg.ext_zfinx) {
@@ -1294,12 +1294,12 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zce) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zca = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zcb = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zcmp = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zcmt = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zca), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcb), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcmp), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcmt), true);
         if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVF) && env->misa_mxl_max == MXL_RV32) {
-            cpu->cfg.ext_zcf = true;
+            cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcf), true);
         }
     }
 
@@ -1367,26 +1367,26 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zkn = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zkn), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zkr), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zkt), true);
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zkn) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zbkb = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zbkc = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zbkx = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zkne = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zknd = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zknh = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zbkb), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zbkc), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zbkx), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zkne), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zknd), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zknh), true);
     }
 
     if (cpu->cfg.ext_zks) {
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zbkb = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zbkc = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zbkx = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zksed = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_zksh = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zbkb), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zbkc), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zbkx), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zksed), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zksh), true);
     }
 
     /*
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 17/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

If we want to make better decisions when auto-enabling extensions during
realize() we need a way to tell if an user set an extension manually.
The RISC-V KVM driver has its own solution via a KVMCPUConfig struct
that has an 'user_set' flag that is set during the Property set()
callback. The set() callback also does init() time validations based on
the current KVM driver capabilities.

For TCG we would want a 'user_set' mechanic too, but we would look
ad-hoc via cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() if a certain extension was user set
or not. If we copy what was made in the KVM side we would look for
'user_set' for one into 60+ extension structs spreaded in 3 arrays
(riscv_cpu_extensions, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts,
riscv_cpu_vendor_exts).

We'll still need an extension struct but we won't be using the
'user_set' flag:

- 'RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig' will be our specialized structure, similar to what
we're already doing with the MISA extensions in 'RISCVCPUMisaExtConfig'.
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL() for all 3 extensions arrays were replaced by
MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL(), a macro that will init our specialized struct;

- the 'multi_ext_user_opts' hash will be used to store the offset of each
extension that the user set via the set() callback, cpu_set_multi_ext_cfg().
For now we're just initializing and populating it - next patch will use
it to determine if a certain extension was user set;

- cpu_add_multi_ext_prop() is a new helper that will replace the
qdev_property_add_static() calls that our macros are doing to populate
user properties. The macro was renamed to ADD_CPU_MULTIEXT_PROPS_ARRAY()
for clarity. Note that the non-extension properties in
riscv_cpu_options[] still need to be declared via qdev().

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 159 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index eeaf69599e..1ca034e6da 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static const struct isa_ext_data isa_edata_arr[] = {
     ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(xventanacondops, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_XVentanaCondOps),
 };
 
+/* Hash that stores user set extensions */
+static GHashTable *multi_ext_user_opts;
+
 static bool isa_ext_is_enabled(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset)
 {
     bool *ext_enabled = (void *)&cpu->cfg + ext_offset;
@@ -1718,6 +1721,8 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
     qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), riscv_cpu_set_irq,
                       IRQ_LOCAL_MAX + IRQ_LOCAL_GUEST_MAX);
 #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
+
+    multi_ext_user_opts = g_hash_table_new(NULL, g_direct_equal);
 }
 
 typedef struct RISCVCPUMisaExtConfig {
@@ -1869,108 +1874,118 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
     }
 }
 
-static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
+typedef struct RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig {
+    const char *name;
+    uint32_t offset;
+    bool enabled;
+} RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig;
+
+#define MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL(_name, _prop, _defval) \
+    {.name = _name, .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop), \
+     .enabled = _defval}
+
+static RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {
     /* Defaults for standard extensions */
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("sscofpmf", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_sscofpmf, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zifencei", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_ifencei, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zicsr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icsr, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zihintntl", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zihintntl, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zihintpause", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zihintpause, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zawrs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zawrs, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zfa", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfa, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zfh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfh, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zfhmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfhmin, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve32f", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve32f, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve64f", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve64f, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve64d", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve64d, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("sstc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_sstc, true),
-
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("smstateen", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smstateen, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svadu", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svadu, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svinval", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svinval, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svnapot", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svnapot, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svpbmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svpbmt, false),
-
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zba, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbb, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbc, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkb, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkc, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbkx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbkx, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbs, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zk", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zk, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkn", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkn, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknd, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkne", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkne, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zknh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zknh, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkr, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zks", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zks, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksed", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksed, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zksh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zksh, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zkt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zkt, false),
-
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zdinx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zdinx, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zfinx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfinx, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zhinx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zhinx, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zhinxmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zhinxmin, false),
-
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zicbom", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icbom, true),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zicboz", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icboz, true),
-
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zmmul", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zmmul, false),
-
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zca", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zca, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcb, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcd", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcd, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zce", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zce, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcf", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcf, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmp, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zcmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zcmt, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("zicond", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zicond, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("sscofpmf", ext_sscofpmf, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zifencei", ext_ifencei, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zicsr", ext_icsr, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zihintntl", ext_zihintntl, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zihintpause", ext_zihintpause, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zawrs", ext_zawrs, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zfa", ext_zfa, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zfh", ext_zfh, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zfhmin", ext_zfhmin, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zve32f", ext_zve32f, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zve64f", ext_zve64f, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("Zve64d", ext_zve64d, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("sstc", ext_sstc, true),
+
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("smstateen", ext_smstateen, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("svadu", ext_svadu, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("svinval", ext_svinval, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("svnapot", ext_svnapot, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("svpbmt", ext_svpbmt, false),
+
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zba", ext_zba, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbb", ext_zbb, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbc", ext_zbc, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbkb", ext_zbkb, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbkc", ext_zbkc, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbkx", ext_zbkx, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zbs", ext_zbs, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zk", ext_zk, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zkn", ext_zkn, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zknd", ext_zknd, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zkne", ext_zkne, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zknh", ext_zknh, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zkr", ext_zkr, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zks", ext_zks, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zksed", ext_zksed, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zksh", ext_zksh, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zkt", ext_zkt, false),
+
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zdinx", ext_zdinx, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zfinx", ext_zfinx, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zhinx", ext_zhinx, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zhinxmin", ext_zhinxmin, false),
+
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zicbom", ext_icbom, true),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zicboz", ext_icboz, true),
+
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zmmul", ext_zmmul, false),
+
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zca", ext_zca, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcb", ext_zcb, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcd", ext_zcd, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zce", ext_zce, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcf", ext_zcf, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcmp", ext_zcmp, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zcmt", ext_zcmt, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("zicond", ext_zicond, false),
 
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
-static Property riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[] = {
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadba, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadbb, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadbs, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadcmo", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadcmo, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadcondmov", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadcondmov, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadfmemidx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadfmemidx, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadfmv", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadfmv, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadmac", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadmac, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadmemidx", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadmemidx, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadmempair", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadmempair, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xtheadsync", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_xtheadsync, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("xventanacondops", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_XVentanaCondOps, false),
+static RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[] = {
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadba", ext_xtheadba, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadbb", ext_xtheadbb, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadbs", ext_xtheadbs, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadcmo", ext_xtheadcmo, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadcondmov", ext_xtheadcondmov, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadfmemidx", ext_xtheadfmemidx, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadfmv", ext_xtheadfmv, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadmac", ext_xtheadmac, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadmemidx", ext_xtheadmemidx, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadmempair", ext_xtheadmempair, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xtheadsync", ext_xtheadsync, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("xventanacondops", ext_XVentanaCondOps, false),
 
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
 /* These are experimental so mark with 'x-' */
-static Property riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] = {
+static RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] = {
     /* ePMP 0.9.3 */
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-epmp", RISCVCPU, cfg.epmp, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-smaia", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_smaia, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-ssaia", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_ssaia, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-epmp", epmp, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-smaia", ext_smaia, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-ssaia", ext_ssaia, false),
 
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvfh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvfh, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvfhmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvfhmin, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvfh", ext_zvfh, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvfhmin", ext_zvfhmin, false),
 
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zfbfmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfbfmin, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvfbfmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvfbfmin, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvfbfwma", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvfbfwma, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zfbfmin", ext_zfbfmin, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvfbfmin", ext_zvfbfmin, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvfbfwma", ext_zvfbfwma, false),
 
     /* Vector cryptography extensions */
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvbb, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvbc, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvkg", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvkg, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvkned", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvkned, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvknha", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvknha, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvknhb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvknhb, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvksed", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvksed, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zvksh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zvksh, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvbb", ext_zvbb, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvbc", ext_zvbc, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvkg", ext_zvkg, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvkned", ext_zvkned, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvknha", ext_zvknha, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvknhb", ext_zvknhb, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvksed", ext_zvksed, false),
+    MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL("x-zvksh", ext_zvksh, false),
 
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
@@ -1993,6 +2008,49 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_options[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
 };
 
+static void cpu_set_multi_ext_cfg(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+                                  void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+    const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *multi_ext_cfg = opaque;
+    bool value;
+
+    if (!visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, errp)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(RISCV_CPU(obj), multi_ext_cfg->offset, value);
+
+    g_hash_table_insert(multi_ext_user_opts,
+                        GUINT_TO_POINTER(multi_ext_cfg->offset),
+                        (gpointer)value);
+}
+
+static void cpu_get_multi_ext_cfg(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+                                  void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+    const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *multi_ext_cfg = opaque;
+    bool value = isa_ext_is_enabled(RISCV_CPU(obj), multi_ext_cfg->offset);
+
+    visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, errp);
+}
+
+static void cpu_add_multi_ext_prop(Object *cpu_obj,
+                                   RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *multi_cfg)
+{
+    object_property_add(cpu_obj, multi_cfg->name, "bool",
+                        cpu_get_multi_ext_cfg,
+                        cpu_set_multi_ext_cfg,
+                        NULL, (void *)multi_cfg);
+
+    /*
+     * Set def val directly instead of using
+     * object_property_set_bool() to save the set()
+     * callback hash for user inputs.
+     */
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(RISCV_CPU(cpu_obj), multi_cfg->offset,
+                           multi_cfg->enabled);
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
 static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
                                     const char *name,
@@ -2012,12 +2070,13 @@ static void cpu_set_cfg_unavailable(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
 }
 #endif
 
-static void riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(DeviceState *dev, Property *array)
+static void riscv_cpu_add_multiext_prop_array(Object *obj,
+                                              RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *array)
 {
     g_assert(array);
 
-    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        qdev_property_add_static(dev, prop);
+    for (RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        cpu_add_multi_ext_prop(obj, prop);
     }
 }
 
@@ -2040,11 +2099,11 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(Object *obj, const char *prop_name)
 }
 
 static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array(Object *obj,
-                                                 Property *array)
+                                                 RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *array)
 {
     g_assert(array);
 
-    for (Property *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+    for (RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *prop = array; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
         riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop(obj, prop->name);
     }
 }
@@ -2079,8 +2138,6 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(Object *obj)
  */
 static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
 {
-    DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
-
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
     riscv_add_satp_mode_properties(obj);
 
@@ -2092,10 +2149,13 @@ static void riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(Object *obj)
 
     riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(obj);
 
-    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_extensions);
-    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_options);
-    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
-    riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array(dev, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
+    riscv_cpu_add_multiext_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
+    riscv_cpu_add_multiext_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_vendor_exts);
+    riscv_cpu_add_multiext_prop_array(obj, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts);
+
+    for (Property *prop = riscv_cpu_options; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
+        qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(obj), prop);
+    }
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2106,7 +2166,7 @@ static void riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions(Object *obj)
 {
     RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(obj);
     CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
-    Property *prop;
+    RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig *prop;
 
     /* Enable RVG, RVJ and RVV that are disabled by default */
     set_misa(env, env->misa_mxl, env->misa_ext | RVG | RVJ | RVV);
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 18/20] target/riscv: use isa_ext_update_enabled() in init_max_cpu_extensions()

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Before adding support to detect if an extension was user set we need to
handle how we're enabling extensions in riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions().
object_property_set_bool() calls the set() callback for the property,
and we're going to use this callback to set the 'multi_ext_user_opts'
hash.

This means that, as is today, all extensions we're setting for the 'max'
CPU will be seen as user set in the future. Let's change set_bool() to
isa_ext_update_enabled() that will just enable/disable the flag on a
certain offset.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 1ca034e6da..617b861258 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -2172,24 +2172,24 @@ static void riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions(Object *obj)
     set_misa(env, env->misa_mxl, env->misa_ext | RVG | RVJ | RVV);
 
     for (prop = riscv_cpu_extensions; prop && prop->name; prop++) {
-        object_property_set_bool(obj, prop->name, true, NULL);
+        isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, prop->offset, true);
     }
 
     /* set vector version */
     env->vext_ver = VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0;
 
     /* Zfinx is not compatible with F. Disable it */
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zfinx", false, NULL);
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zdinx", false, NULL);
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zhinx", false, NULL);
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zhinxmin", false, NULL);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zfinx), false);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zdinx), false);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zhinx), false);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zhinxmin), false);
 
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zce", false, NULL);
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zcmp", false, NULL);
-    object_property_set_bool(obj, "zcmt", false, NULL);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zce), false);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcmp), false);
+    isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcmt), false);
 
     if (env->misa_mxl != MXL_RV32) {
-        object_property_set_bool(obj, "zcf", false, NULL);
+        isa_ext_update_enabled(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zcf), false);
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 19/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: honor user choice in cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Add a new cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set() helper to check if an extension was
set by the user in the command line. Use it inside
cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() to verify if the user set a certain extension
and, if that's the case, do not change its value.

This will make us honor user choice instead of overwriting the values.
Users will then be informed whether they're using an incompatible set of
extensions instead of QEMU setting a magic value that works.

The reason why we're not implementing user choice for MISA extensions
right now is because, today, we do not silently change any MISA bit
during realize() time (we do warn when enabling bits if RVG is enabled).
We do that - a lot - with multi-letter extensions though, so we're
handling the most immediate concern first.

After this patch, we'll now error out if the user explicitly set 'zce' to true
and 'zca' to false:

$ ./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt -cpu rv64,zce=true,zca=false -nographic
qemu-system-riscv64: Zcf/Zcd/Zcb/Zcmp/Zcmt extensions require Zca extension

This didn't happen before because we were enabling 'zca' if 'zce' was enabled
regardless if the user set 'zca' to false.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 617b861258..78382cb5f2 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ static int cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(uint32_t ext_offset)
     g_assert_not_reached();
 }
 
+static bool cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(uint32_t ext_offset)
+{
+    return g_hash_table_contains(multi_ext_user_opts,
+                                 GUINT_TO_POINTER(ext_offset));
+}
+
 static void cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
                                     bool value)
 {
@@ -206,6 +212,10 @@ static void cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(RISCVCPU *cpu, uint32_t ext_offset,
         return;
     }
 
+    if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(ext_offset)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
     if (value && env->priv_ver != PRIV_VERSION_LATEST) {
         /* Do not enable it if priv_ver is older than min_version */
         min_version = cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version(ext_offset);
@@ -1847,6 +1857,12 @@ static RISCVCPUMisaExtConfig misa_ext_cfgs[] = {
     MISA_CFG(RVG, false),
 };
 
+/*
+ * We do not support user choice tracking for MISA
+ * extensions yet because, so far, we do not silently
+ * change MISA bits during realize() (RVG enables MISA
+ * bits but the user is warned about it).
+ */
 static void riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(Object *cpu_obj)
 {
     int i;
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v9 20/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

Enabling RVG will enable a set of extensions that we're not checking if
the user was okay enabling or not. And in this case we want to error
out, instead of ignoring, otherwise we will be inconsistent enabling RVG
without all its extensions.

After this patch, disabling ifencei or icsr while enabling RVG will
result in error:

$ ./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt -cpu rv64,g=true,Zifencei=false --nographic
qemu-system-riscv64: RVG requires Zifencei but user set Zifencei to false

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
---
 target/riscv/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 78382cb5f2..be1c028095 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -1153,9 +1153,23 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
           riscv_has_ext(env, RVA) && riscv_has_ext(env, RVF) &&
           riscv_has_ext(env, RVD) &&
           cpu->cfg.ext_icsr && cpu->cfg.ext_ifencei)) {
+
+        if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_icsr)) &&
+            !cpu->cfg.ext_icsr) {
+            error_setg(errp, "RVG requires Zicsr but user set Zicsr to false");
+            return;
+        }
+
+        if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_ifencei)) &&
+            !cpu->cfg.ext_ifencei) {
+            error_setg(errp, "RVG requires Zifencei but user set "
+                       "Zifencei to false");
+            return;
+        }
+
         warn_report("Setting G will also set IMAFD_Zicsr_Zifencei");
-        cpu->cfg.ext_icsr = true;
-        cpu->cfg.ext_ifencei = true;
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_icsr), true);
+        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_ifencei), true);
 
         env->misa_ext |= RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD;
         env->misa_ext_mask |= RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD;
-- 
2.41.0

Re: [PATCH v9 20/20] target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG

[Andrew Jones]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 04:46:26PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Enabling RVG will enable a set of extensions that we're not checking if
> the user was okay enabling or not. And in this case we want to error
> out, instead of ignoring, otherwise we will be inconsistent enabling RVG
> without all its extensions.
> 
> After this patch, disabling ifencei or icsr while enabling RVG will
> result in error:
> 
> $ ./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt -cpu rv64,g=true,Zifencei=false --nographic
> qemu-system-riscv64: RVG requires Zifencei but user set Zifencei to false
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 78382cb5f2..be1c028095 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -1153,9 +1153,23 @@ void riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>            riscv_has_ext(env, RVA) && riscv_has_ext(env, RVF) &&
>            riscv_has_ext(env, RVD) &&
>            cpu->cfg.ext_icsr && cpu->cfg.ext_ifencei)) {
> +
> +        if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_icsr)) &&
> +            !cpu->cfg.ext_icsr) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "RVG requires Zicsr but user set Zicsr to false");
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set(CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_ifencei)) &&
> +            !cpu->cfg.ext_ifencei) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "RVG requires Zifencei but user set "
> +                       "Zifencei to false");
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
>          warn_report("Setting G will also set IMAFD_Zicsr_Zifencei");
> -        cpu->cfg.ext_icsr = true;
> -        cpu->cfg.ext_ifencei = true;
> +        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_icsr), true);
> +        cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update(cpu, CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_ifencei), true);
>  
>          env->misa_ext |= RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD;
>          env->misa_ext_mask |= RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD;
> -- 
> 2.41.0
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>

Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:48 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This new version contains suggestions made by Andrew Jones in v8.
>
> Most notable change is the removal of the opensbi.py test in patch 11,
> which was replaced by a TuxBoot test. It's more suitable to test the
> integrity of all the extensions enabled by the 'max' CPU.
>
> The series is available in this branch:
>
> https://gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/-/tree/max_cpu_user_choice_v9
>
> Patches missing acks: 11, 15
>
> Changes from v8:
> - patch 7:
>   - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
> - patch 8:
>   - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
> - patch 11:
>   - removed both opensbi.py tests
>   - added 2 'max' cpu tuxboot tests in tuxrun_baselines.py
> - patch 12:
>   - fixed typos in deprecated.rst
> - patch 15:
>   - use g_assert_not_reached() at the end of cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version()
> - patch 19:
>   - added comment on top of riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() explaining why
>     we're not implementing user choice support for MISA properties
> - patch 20:
>   - warn_report() is now called after the G error conditions
> - v8 link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20230824221440.484675-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>
>
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (20):
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split CPU options from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: skip 'bool' check when filtering KVM props
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper
>   target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split non-ratified exts from
>     riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split vendor exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: limit cfg->vext_spec log message
>   target/riscv: add 'max' CPU type
>   avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU
>   target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: use offset in isa_ext_is_enabled/update_enabled
>   target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: use cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() during realize()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig
>   target/riscv: use isa_ext_update_enabled() in
>     init_max_cpu_extensions()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: honor user choice in cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

>
>  docs/about/deprecated.rst         |  12 +
>  target/riscv/cpu-qom.h            |   1 +
>  target/riscv/cpu.c                | 564 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  target/riscv/cpu.h                |   2 +
>  target/riscv/kvm.c                |   8 +-
>  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py |  32 ++
>  6 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG

[Alistair Francis]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:48 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This new version contains suggestions made by Andrew Jones in v8.
>
> Most notable change is the removal of the opensbi.py test in patch 11,
> which was replaced by a TuxBoot test. It's more suitable to test the
> integrity of all the extensions enabled by the 'max' CPU.
>
> The series is available in this branch:
>
> https://gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/-/tree/max_cpu_user_choice_v9
>
> Patches missing acks: 11, 15
>
> Changes from v8:
> - patch 7:
>   - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
> - patch 8:
>   - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
> - patch 11:
>   - removed both opensbi.py tests
>   - added 2 'max' cpu tuxboot tests in tuxrun_baselines.py
> - patch 12:
>   - fixed typos in deprecated.rst
> - patch 15:
>   - use g_assert_not_reached() at the end of cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version()
> - patch 19:
>   - added comment on top of riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() explaining why
>     we're not implementing user choice support for MISA properties
> - patch 20:
>   - warn_report() is now called after the G error conditions
> - v8 link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20230824221440.484675-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>
>
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (20):
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split CPU options from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: skip 'bool' check when filtering KVM props
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper
>   target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split non-ratified exts from
>     riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: split vendor exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: limit cfg->vext_spec log message
>   target/riscv: add 'max' CPU type
>   avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU
>   target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: use offset in isa_ext_is_enabled/update_enabled
>   target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: use cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() during realize()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig
>   target/riscv: use isa_ext_update_enabled() in
>     init_max_cpu_extensions()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: honor user choice in cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>   target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG

This series has some build issues. I was hoping a few simple #ifdef
changes would fix it, but it's a little more complex than that
unfortunately.

I'm going to drop this series, do you mind sending a new version which
fixes this and any other build failures:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5045998521

Alistair

>
>  docs/about/deprecated.rst         |  12 +
>  target/riscv/cpu-qom.h            |   1 +
>  target/riscv/cpu.c                | 564 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  target/riscv/cpu.h                |   2 +
>  target/riscv/kvm.c                |   8 +-
>  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py |  32 ++
>  6 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>

Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] riscv: 'max' CPU, detect user choice in TCG

[Daniel Henrique Barboza]

On 9/10/23 23:34, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 5:48 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This new version contains suggestions made by Andrew Jones in v8.
>>
>> Most notable change is the removal of the opensbi.py test in patch 11,
>> which was replaced by a TuxBoot test. It's more suitable to test the
>> integrity of all the extensions enabled by the 'max' CPU.
>>
>> The series is available in this branch:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/-/tree/max_cpu_user_choice_v9
>>
>> Patches missing acks: 11, 15
>>
>> Changes from v8:
>> - patch 7:
>>    - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
>> - patch 8:
>>    - add g_assert(array) at the start of riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
>> - patch 11:
>>    - removed both opensbi.py tests
>>    - added 2 'max' cpu tuxboot tests in tuxrun_baselines.py
>> - patch 12:
>>    - fixed typos in deprecated.rst
>> - patch 15:
>>    - use g_assert_not_reached() at the end of cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version()
>> - patch 19:
>>    - added comment on top of riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() explaining why
>>      we're not implementing user choice support for MISA properties
>> - patch 20:
>>    - warn_report() is now called after the G error conditions
>> - v8 link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20230824221440.484675-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> Daniel Henrique Barboza (20):
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: split CPU options from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: skip 'bool' check when filtering KVM props
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: split kvm prop handling to its own helper
>>    target/riscv: add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() to riscv_cpu_options[]
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: split non-ratified exts from
>>      riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: split vendor exts from riscv_cpu_extensions[]
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_qdev_prop_array()
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: add riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop_array()
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: limit cfg->vext_spec log message
>>    target/riscv: add 'max' CPU type
>>    avocado, risc-v: add tuxboot tests for 'max' CPU
>>    target/riscv: deprecate the 'any' CPU type
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: use offset in isa_ext_is_enabled/update_enabled
>>    target/riscv: make CPUCFG() macro public
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: use cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() during realize()
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: introduce RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig
>>    target/riscv: use isa_ext_update_enabled() in
>>      init_max_cpu_extensions()
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: honor user choice in cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update()
>>    target/riscv/cpu.c: consider user option with RVG
> 
> This series has some build issues. I was hoping a few simple #ifdef
> changes would fix it, but it's a little more complex than that
> unfortunately.
> 
> I'm going to drop this series, do you mind sending a new version which
> fixes this and any other build failures:
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5045998521

Sure. I'll wait for the pending PR to be merged first. I'll also take the
opportunity  to make the CONFIG_KVM change that Phil requested.


Thanks,

Daniel

> 
> Alistair
> 
>>
>>   docs/about/deprecated.rst         |  12 +
>>   target/riscv/cpu-qom.h            |   1 +
>>   target/riscv/cpu.c                | 564 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   target/riscv/cpu.h                |   2 +
>>   target/riscv/kvm.c                |   8 +-
>>   tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py |  32 ++
>>   6 files changed, 450 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.41.0
>>
>>