From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"William Tsai" <williamtsai1111@gmail.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] qom: fix setting of qdev array properties
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 17:25:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230904162544.2388037-1-berrange@redhat.com> (raw)
By the time of the 8.2.0 release, it will have been 2 years and 6
releases since we accidentally broke setting of array properties
for user creatable devices:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1090
Some context:
* Initial identification / report on the mailing list
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-07/msg00111.html
* Sub-thread of that exploring the background on need/use of array
properties:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-07/msg01531.html
* Markus' initial PoC for an order preserving QDict impl
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-07/msg00758.html
* A later (unrelated?) patch for order preserving QDict impl
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-05/msg03229.html
* A re-posting of the new patch
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-09/msg00292.html
Personally I'm not a fan of the introducing the order preserving QDict
impl, because I feel that the need to preserve QDict ordering is a
design bug. Not that I think the current ordering when iterating over
QDict is in any way special. I just rather see the ordering left as
"undefined" and any callers that need a specific ordering should apply
what they need.
Since setting device array properties requires that 'len-XXX' be
processed first, so the following patch does exactly that. We iterate
over the properties twice, first setting the 'len-XXX' properties,
then setting everything else.
I still think for user creatable devices we'd be better off just
mandating the use of JSON syntax for -device and thus leveraging
the native JSON array type. This patch was the quick fix for the
existing array property syntax though.
Daniel P. Berrangé (1):
qom: fix setting of array properties
qom/object_interfaces.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-09-04 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-04 16:25 Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-09-04 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/1] qom: fix setting of array properties Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-05 8:58 ` [PATCH 0/1] qom: fix setting of qdev " Kevin Wolf
2023-09-05 9:35 ` Peter Maydell
2023-09-07 9:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-09-07 9:35 ` Peter Maydell
2023-09-07 10:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-08 9:25 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-09-08 9:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-08 12:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-09-08 12:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-08 9:53 ` Peter Maydell
2023-09-08 12:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-09-08 12:52 ` Peter Maydell
2023-09-07 12:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-09-07 14:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-09-07 9:45 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230904162544.2388037-1-berrange@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=williamtsai1111@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).