qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, clg@redhat.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
	mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org,
	peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, philmd@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] VIRTIO-IOMMU/VFIO: Don't assume 64b IOVA space
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 11:55:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230905115558.590ea2e5.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230904080451.424731-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>

On Mon,  4 Sep 2023 10:03:43 +0200
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:

> On x86, when assigning VFIO-PCI devices protected with virtio-iommu
> we encounter the case where the guest tries to map IOVAs beyond 48b
> whereas the physical VTD IOMMU only supports 48b. This ends up with
> VFIO_MAP_DMA failures at qemu level because at kernel level,
> vfio_iommu_iova_dma_valid() check returns false on vfio_map_do_map().
> 
> This is due to the fact the virtio-iommu currently unconditionally
> exposes an IOVA range of 64b through its config input range fields.
> 
> This series removes this assumption by retrieving the usable IOVA
> regions through the VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE UAPI when
> a VFIO device is attached. This info is communicated to the
> virtio-iommu memory region, transformed into the inversed info, ie.
> the host reserved IOVA regions. Then those latter are combined with the
> reserved IOVA regions set though the virtio-iommu reserved-regions
> property. That way, the guest virtio-iommu driver, unchanged, is
> able to probe the whole set of reserved regions and prevent any IOVA
> belonging to those ranges from beeing used, achieving the original goal.

Hi Eric,

I don't quite follow this relative to device hotplug.  Are we
manipulating a per-device memory region which is created at device add
time?  Is that memory region actually shared in some cases, for instance
if we have a PCIe-to-PCI bridge aliasing devices on the conventional
side?  Thanks,

Alex

> This series can be found at:
> https://github.com/eauger/qemu/tree/virtio-iommu_geometry_v1
> 
> Eric Auger (13):
>   memory: Let ReservedRegion use Range
>   memory: Introduce memory_region_iommu_set_iova_ranges
>   vfio: Collect container iova range info
>   virtio-iommu: Rename reserved_regions into prop_resv_regions
>   virtio-iommu: Introduce per IOMMUDevice reserved regions
>   range: Introduce range_inverse_array()
>   virtio-iommu: Implement set_iova_ranges() callback
>   range: Make range_compare() public
>   util/reserved-region: Add new ReservedRegion helpers
>   virtio-iommu: Consolidate host reserved regions and property set ones
>   test: Add some tests for range and resv-mem helpers
>   virtio-iommu: Resize memory region according to the max iova info
>   vfio: Remove 64-bit IOVA address space assumption
> 
>  include/exec/memory.h            |  30 ++++-
>  include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h    |   2 +
>  include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h |   7 +-
>  include/qemu/range.h             |   9 ++
>  include/qemu/reserved-region.h   |  32 +++++
>  hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c |   9 +-
>  hw/vfio/common.c                 |  70 ++++++++---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-iommu-pci.c     |   8 +-
>  hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c         |  85 +++++++++++--
>  softmmu/memory.c                 |  15 +++
>  tests/unit/test-resv-mem.c       | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  util/range.c                     |  41 ++++++-
>  util/reserved-region.c           |  94 +++++++++++++++
>  hw/virtio/trace-events           |   1 +
>  tests/unit/meson.build           |   1 +
>  util/meson.build                 |   1 +
>  16 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/qemu/reserved-region.h
>  create mode 100644 tests/unit/test-resv-mem.c
>  create mode 100644 util/reserved-region.c
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-04  8:03 [PATCH 00/13] VIRTIO-IOMMU/VFIO: Don't assume 64b IOVA space Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 01/13] memory: Let ReservedRegion use Range Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:12   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-04 14:22     ` Eric Auger
2023-09-06  7:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-11 18:40   ` Peter Xu
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 02/13] memory: Introduce memory_region_iommu_set_iova_ranges Eric Auger
2023-09-11 18:41   ` Peter Xu
2023-09-14 13:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 03/13] vfio: Collect container iova range info Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 04/13] virtio-iommu: Rename reserved_regions into prop_resv_regions Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 05/13] virtio-iommu: Introduce per IOMMUDevice reserved regions Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 06/13] range: Introduce range_inverse_array() Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:18   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-04 14:21     ` Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 07/13] virtio-iommu: Implement set_iova_ranges() callback Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 08/13] range: Make range_compare() public Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:19   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 09/13] util/reserved-region: Add new ReservedRegion helpers Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 10/13] virtio-iommu: Consolidate host reserved regions and property set ones Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 11/13] test: Add some tests for range and resv-mem helpers Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 12/13] virtio-iommu: Resize memory region according to the max iova info Eric Auger
2023-09-04  8:21   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] vfio: Remove 64-bit IOVA address space assumption Eric Auger
2023-09-05  8:22 ` [PATCH 00/13] VIRTIO-IOMMU/VFIO: Don't assume 64b IOVA space YangHang Liu
2023-09-05  9:15   ` Eric Auger
2023-09-05  9:50   ` Eric Auger
2023-09-05 17:55 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-09-06  6:40   ` Eric Auger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230905115558.590ea2e5.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).