From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B117EE800C for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qecNP-0002R8-GP; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 10:22:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qecNM-00025D-Qr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 10:22:24 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qecNK-0001nI-Fh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 10:22:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1694182941; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HHE7mkrehWHgWXyRLmrgc4bzKfsgE2qS/kJ9qG1wK7I=; b=Ww5H7od7BcG1SwTOAz6pvxQKxjjpeIh+eM6XP7ugVNoKx36riXCAxXX9UXsRt0MVmBZJH5 nxrAopbLI95suG8HevSvIw8IWmNE0KZWJyYtFphWlYmJskl8E+MuNH8fjicqpCZViTd1sE HLcB2zjaaU9jeL9wI8VMopc7OmYRR3E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-96-mnRxv0qmMK-6G8ySNyzUgQ-1; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 10:22:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mnRxv0qmMK-6G8ySNyzUgQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45B08101CA83; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t14s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.76]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67FCC03295; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:22:15 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: David Hildenbrand , Paolo Bonzini , Igor Mammedov , Xiao Guangrong , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Peter Xu , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , Yanan Wang , Michal Privoznik , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Gavin Shan , Alex Williamson , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 13/16] memory: Clarify mapping requirements for RamDiscardManager Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 16:21:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20230908142136.403541-14-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230908142136.403541-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20230908142136.403541-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org We really only care about the RAM memory region not being mapped into an address space yet as long as we're still setting up the RamDiscardManager. Once mapped into an address space, memory notifiers would get notified about such a region and any attempts to modify the RamDiscardManager would be wrong. While "mapped into an address space" is easy to check for RAM regions that are mapped directly (following the ->container links), it's harder to check when such regions are mapped indirectly via aliases. For now, we can only detect that a region is mapped through an alias (->mapped_via_alias), but we don't have a handle on these aliases to follow all their ->container links to test if they are eventually mapped into an address space. So relax the assertion in memory_region_set_ram_discard_manager(), remove the check in memory_region_get_ram_discard_manager() and clarify the doc. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- include/exec/memory.h | 5 +++-- softmmu/memory.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h index 68284428f8..5feb704585 100644 --- a/include/exec/memory.h +++ b/include/exec/memory.h @@ -593,8 +593,9 @@ typedef void (*ReplayRamDiscard)(MemoryRegionSection *section, void *opaque); * populated (consuming memory), to be used/accessed by the VM. * * A #RamDiscardManager can only be set for a RAM #MemoryRegion while the - * #MemoryRegion isn't mapped yet; it cannot change while the #MemoryRegion is - * mapped. + * #MemoryRegion isn't mapped into an address space yet (either directly + * or via an alias); it cannot change while the #MemoryRegion is + * mapped into an address space. * * The #RamDiscardManager is intended to be used by technologies that are * incompatible with discarding of RAM (e.g., VFIO, which may pin all diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c index 7d9494ce70..c1e8aa133f 100644 --- a/softmmu/memory.c +++ b/softmmu/memory.c @@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ int memory_region_iommu_num_indexes(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr) RamDiscardManager *memory_region_get_ram_discard_manager(MemoryRegion *mr) { - if (!memory_region_is_mapped(mr) || !memory_region_is_ram(mr)) { + if (!memory_region_is_ram(mr)) { return NULL; } return mr->rdm; @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ RamDiscardManager *memory_region_get_ram_discard_manager(MemoryRegion *mr) void memory_region_set_ram_discard_manager(MemoryRegion *mr, RamDiscardManager *rdm) { - g_assert(memory_region_is_ram(mr) && !memory_region_is_mapped(mr)); + g_assert(memory_region_is_ram(mr)); g_assert(!rdm || !mr->rdm); mr->rdm = rdm; } -- 2.41.0