From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, linuxarm@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:09:36 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231012130936.00004f9a@Huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231003163747-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:42:37 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:34:32AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur > > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it > > easier to see that by using switch statements. > > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the > > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of > > the array indices. > > > > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> > > --- > > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > index f3bbf0fd13..7ef3ef2bd6 100644 > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, > > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque; > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > + switch (size) { > > + case 4: > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4); > > + } else { > > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4); > > In C currently static_assert needs a message. I switched to QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() which seems better + doesn't need a additional message. > > In fact clang warns: > ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:75:67: error: '_Static_assert' with no message is a C2x extension [-Werror,-Wc2x-extensions] > static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4); > Thanks, Jonathan > > > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > + } > > + case 8: > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > return 0; > > - } > > - > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size); > > - } else { > > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > + default: > > + /* > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > + */ > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > } > > } > > > > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > uint32_t mask; > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > + switch (size) { > > + case 4: > > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) == 4); > > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4); > > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4]; > > + value &= mask; > > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > + } else { > > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value; > > + } > > + return; > > + case 8: > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > return; > > - } > > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)]; > > - value &= mask; > > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > - return; > > - } > > - > > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > - } else { > > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value; > > + default: > > + /* > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > + */ > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > } > > } > > > > -- > > 2.39.2 >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, linuxarm@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:09:36 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231012130936.00004f9a@Huawei.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20231012120936.9v_zZtZ5foCLg1ufvXncpgCvPjNouJvzmSmG7ivJmQ4@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231003163747-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 16:42:37 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:34:32AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur > > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it > > easier to see that by using switch statements. > > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the > > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of > > the array indices. > > > > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> > > --- > > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > index f3bbf0fd13..7ef3ef2bd6 100644 > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, > > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque; > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > + switch (size) { > > + case 4: > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4); > > + } else { > > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4); > > In C currently static_assert needs a message. I switched to QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() which seems better + doesn't need a additional message. > > In fact clang warns: > ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:75:67: error: '_Static_assert' with no message is a C2x extension [-Werror,-Wc2x-extensions] > static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4); > Thanks, Jonathan > > > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > + } > > + case 8: > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > return 0; > > - } > > - > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size); > > - } else { > > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > + default: > > + /* > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > + */ > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > } > > } > > > > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > uint32_t mask; > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > + switch (size) { > > + case 4: > > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) == 4); > > + static_assert(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) == 4); > > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4]; > > + value &= mask; > > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > + } else { > > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value; > > + } > > + return; > > + case 8: > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > return; > > - } > > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)]; > > - value &= mask; > > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > - return; > > - } > > - > > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > - } else { > > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value; > > + default: > > + /* > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > + */ > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > } > > } > > > > -- > > 2.39.2 >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 12:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-09-19 9:34 [PATCH v3 0/4] hw/cxl: Line length reduction and related Jonathan Cameron via 2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hw/cxl: Use a switch to explicitly check size in caps_reg_read() Jonathan Cameron via 2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Jonathan Cameron via 2023-09-20 5:08 ` Michael Tokarev 2023-09-20 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-03 20:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2023-10-12 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message] 2023-10-12 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] hw/cxl: CXLDVSECPortExtensions renamed to CXLDVSECPortExt Jonathan Cameron via 2023-09-19 9:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] hw/cxl: Line length reductions Jonathan Cameron via
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20231012130936.00004f9a@Huawei.com \ --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \ --cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \ --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \ --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=philmd@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).