From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, clg@redhat.com,
jean-philippe@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
philmd@linaro.org, zhenzhong.duan@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] VIRTIO-IOMMU/VFIO: Don't assume 64b IOVA space
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:37:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018093723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231011175516.541374-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> This applies on top of vfio-next:
> https://github.com/legoater/qemu/, vfio-next branch
virtio things make sense
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
let me know how you want to merge all this.
> On x86, when assigning VFIO-PCI devices protected with virtio-iommu
> we encounter the case where the guest tries to map IOVAs beyond 48b
> whereas the physical VTD IOMMU only supports 48b. This ends up with
> VFIO_MAP_DMA failures at qemu level because at kernel level,
> vfio_iommu_iova_dma_valid() check returns false on vfio_map_do_map().
>
> This is due to the fact the virtio-iommu currently unconditionally
> exposes an IOVA range of 64b through its config input range fields.
>
> This series removes this assumption by retrieving the usable IOVA
> regions through the VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE UAPI when
> a VFIO device is attached. This info is communicated to the
> virtio-iommu memory region, transformed into the inversed info, ie.
> the host reserved IOVA regions. Then those latter are combined with the
> reserved IOVA regions set though the virtio-iommu reserved-regions
> property. That way, the guest virtio-iommu driver, unchanged, is
> able to probe the whole set of reserved regions and prevent any IOVA
> belonging to those ranges from beeing used, achieving the original goal.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Eric
>
> This series can be found at:
> https://github.com/eauger/qemu/tree/vfio-next-iommu_geometry-v3
>
> History:
> v2 -> v3:
> - rebase on top of vfio-next (including iommufd prereq)
> - take into account IOVA range info capability may not be offered by
> old kernel and use nr_iovas = -1 to encode that [Alex]
> - use GList * everywhere instead of arrays (in the range_inverse_array)
> with the benefice it sorts ranges retrieved from the kernel which are
> not garanteed to be sorted. Rework the tests accordingly [Alex]
> - Make sure resv_regions GList is build before the probe() [Jean]
> per device list is first populated with prop resv regions on
> IOMMUDevice creation and then rebuilt on set_iova()
> - Add a warning if set_iova builds a valid list after probe was
> called [Jean]
> - Build host windows on top of IOVA valid ranges if this info can
> be retrieved from the kernel. As many windows are created as
> valid ranges
> v1 -> v2:
> - Remove "[PATCH 12/13] virtio-iommu: Resize memory region according
> to the max iova info" which causes way too much trouble: trigger
> a coredump in vhost, causes duplication of IOMMU notifiers causing
> EEXIST vfio_dma_map errors, ... This looks like a bad usage of the
> memory API so I prefer removing this from this series. So I was
> also obliged to remove the vfio_find_hostwin() check in the case
> of an IOMMU.
> - Let range_inverse_array() take low/high args instead of hardcoding
> 0, UINT64_MAX which both complexifies the algo and the tests.
> - Move range function description in header.
> - Check that if set_iova_ranges is called several times, new resv
> regions are included in previous ones
>
> Eric Auger (13):
> memory: Let ReservedRegion use Range
> memory: Introduce memory_region_iommu_set_iova_ranges
> vfio: Collect container iova range info
> virtio-iommu: Rename reserved_regions into prop_resv_regions
> range: Make range_compare() public
> util/reserved-region: Add new ReservedRegion helpers
> virtio-iommu: Introduce per IOMMUDevice reserved regions
> range: Introduce range_inverse_array()
> virtio-iommu: Record whether a probe request has been issued
> virtio-iommu: Implement set_iova_ranges() callback
> virtio-iommu: Consolidate host reserved regions and property set ones
> test: Add some tests for range and resv-mem helpers
> vfio: Remove 64-bit IOVA address space assumption
>
> include/exec/memory.h | 34 +++-
> include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 2 +
> include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h | 7 +-
> include/qemu/range.h | 14 ++
> include/qemu/reserved-region.h | 32 ++++
> hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c | 9 +-
> hw/vfio/common.c | 23 ++-
> hw/vfio/container.c | 67 ++++++-
> hw/virtio/virtio-iommu-pci.c | 8 +-
> hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c | 155 +++++++++++++--
> system/memory.c | 13 ++
> tests/unit/test-resv-mem.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> util/range.c | 61 +++++-
> util/reserved-region.c | 91 +++++++++
> hw/virtio/trace-events | 1 +
> tests/unit/meson.build | 1 +
> util/meson.build | 1 +
> 17 files changed, 791 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/qemu/reserved-region.h
> create mode 100644 tests/unit/test-resv-mem.c
> create mode 100644 util/reserved-region.c
>
> --
> 2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 17:52 [PATCH v3 00/13] VIRTIO-IOMMU/VFIO: Don't assume 64b IOVA space Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] memory: Let ReservedRegion use Range Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] memory: Introduce memory_region_iommu_set_iova_ranges Eric Auger
2023-10-18 22:07 ` Peter Xu
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] vfio: Collect container iova range info Eric Auger
2023-10-18 19:07 ` Alex Williamson
2023-10-19 6:39 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] virtio-iommu: Rename reserved_regions into prop_resv_regions Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] range: Make range_compare() public Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] util/reserved-region: Add new ReservedRegion helpers Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] virtio-iommu: Introduce per IOMMUDevice reserved regions Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] range: Introduce range_inverse_array() Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] virtio-iommu: Record whether a probe request has been issued Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] virtio-iommu: Implement set_iova_ranges() callback Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] virtio-iommu: Consolidate host reserved regions and property set ones Eric Auger
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] test: Add some tests for range and resv-mem helpers Eric Auger
2023-10-30 7:48 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-10-11 17:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] vfio: Remove 64-bit IOVA address space assumption Eric Auger
2023-10-18 21:42 ` Alex Williamson
2023-10-19 6:37 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-18 13:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-10-19 9:07 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] VIRTIO-IOMMU/VFIO: Don't assume 64b IOVA space YangHang Liu
2023-10-19 9:08 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-19 11:07 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-10-19 11:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-19 13:51 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-19 17:40 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231018093723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).