From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:24:48 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231019122448.0000009e@Huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231019052242-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 05:23:04 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:31:42 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:22:39 +0100 > > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:40:45 -0400 > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur > > > > > > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it > > > > > > easier to see that by using switch statements. > > > > > > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the > > > > > > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of > > > > > > the array indices. > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> > > > > > > > > > > Fails with clang: > > > > > > > > > > ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:130:9: error: expected expression > > > > > QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4); > > > > > ^ > > > > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:76:30: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON' > > > > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(x) QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, "not expecting: " #x) > > > > > ^ > > > > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:74:36: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG' > > > > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, msg) _Static_assert(!(x), msg) > > > > > ^ > > > > > 1 error generated. > > > > > > > > > > See e.g. > > > > > > > > > > https://gitlab.com/mstredhat/qemu/-/jobs/5320879531 > > > > > > > > Thanks. Will see if I can figure out what is going wrong. > > > > This code seems cursed. I need to figure out a way to run the CI again. > > > > Ran into credit problems I couldn't solve last time I tried. > > > > > > > > In meantime I can replicate this locally but not immediately obvious to me > > > > why it is failing. > > > > > > Any clang experts around? This seems to be fixed by reducing the scope > > > > > > case 4: > > > { > > > QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(); > > > } > > > I have no idea why though... > > > > > > > For anyone following along I asked a friendly compiler guy... > > > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69572 > > > > Given that we realistically need to work around this whatever the outcome > > I'll add some brackets and send an update. > > > > thanks, > > > > Jonathan > > We don't seem to use QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON outside of functions - just add > brackets inside it? Makes sense. I'll give that a go and see if anything odd happens. Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > v4: Use QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() instead of static_assert with missing > > > > > > error message. > > > > > > > > > > > > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > > > > > index f3bbf0fd13..d1997a52e6 100644 > > > > > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > > > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > > > > > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, > > > > > > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque; > > > > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > > > > > + switch (size) { > > > > > > + case 4: > > > > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > > > > > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4); > > > > > > + } else { > > > > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4); > > > > > > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + case 8: > > > > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > > > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > - > > > > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > > > > > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size); > > > > > > - } else { > > > > > > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > > > > > + default: > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > > > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > > > > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > > > > > uint32_t mask; > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > > > > > + switch (size) { > > > > > > + case 4: > > > > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4); > > > > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4); > > > > > > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4]; > > > > > > + value &= mask; > > > > > > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > > > > > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > > > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > > > > > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > > > > > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > > > > > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > > > > > + } else { > > > > > > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > + case 8: > > > > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > > > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > > > > > return; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)]; > > > > > > - value &= mask; > > > > > > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > > > > > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > > > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > > > > > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > > > > > - return; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > - > > > > > > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > > > > > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > > > > > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > > > > > - } else { > > > > > > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value; > > > > > > + default: > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > > > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.39.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, "Fan Ni" <fan.ni@samsung.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:24:48 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20231019122448.0000009e@Huawei.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20231019112448.Dalk1d_R_PKf8ofSzprkJSCeIjkwc_HmKMfj8AtI6_c@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20231019052242-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 05:23:04 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:31:42 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:22:39 +0100 > > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:40:45 -0400 > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > Establishing that only register accesses of size 4 and 8 can occur > > > > > > using these functions requires looking at their callers. Make it > > > > > > easier to see that by using switch statements. > > > > > > Assertions are used to enforce that the register storage is of the > > > > > > matching size, allowing fixed values to be used for divisors of > > > > > > the array indices. > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com> > > > > > > > > > > Fails with clang: > > > > > > > > > > ../hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c:130:9: error: expected expression > > > > > QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4); > > > > > ^ > > > > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:76:30: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON' > > > > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(x) QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, "not expecting: " #x) > > > > > ^ > > > > > ../include/qemu/compiler.h:74:36: note: expanded from macro 'QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG' > > > > > #define QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(x, msg) _Static_assert(!(x), msg) > > > > > ^ > > > > > 1 error generated. > > > > > > > > > > See e.g. > > > > > > > > > > https://gitlab.com/mstredhat/qemu/-/jobs/5320879531 > > > > > > > > Thanks. Will see if I can figure out what is going wrong. > > > > This code seems cursed. I need to figure out a way to run the CI again. > > > > Ran into credit problems I couldn't solve last time I tried. > > > > > > > > In meantime I can replicate this locally but not immediately obvious to me > > > > why it is failing. > > > > > > Any clang experts around? This seems to be fixed by reducing the scope > > > > > > case 4: > > > { > > > QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(); > > > } > > > I have no idea why though... > > > > > > > For anyone following along I asked a friendly compiler guy... > > > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69572 > > > > Given that we realistically need to work around this whatever the outcome > > I'll add some brackets and send an update. > > > > thanks, > > > > Jonathan > > We don't seem to use QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON outside of functions - just add > brackets inside it? Makes sense. I'll give that a go and see if anything odd happens. Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > v4: Use QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON() instead of static_assert with missing > > > > > > error message. > > > > > > > > > > > > hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > > > > > index f3bbf0fd13..d1997a52e6 100644 > > > > > > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > > > > > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-component-utils.c > > > > > > @@ -67,16 +67,24 @@ static uint64_t cxl_cache_mem_read_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, > > > > > > CXLComponentState *cxl_cstate = opaque; > > > > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > > > > > + switch (size) { > > > > > > + case 4: > > > > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > > > > > + return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, 4); > > > > > > + } else { > > > > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4); > > > > > > + return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + case 8: > > > > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > > > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > - > > > > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->read) { > > > > > > - return cregs->special_ops->read(cxl_cstate, offset, size); > > > > > > - } else { > > > > > > - return cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > > > > > + default: > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > > > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -117,25 +125,36 @@ static void cxl_cache_mem_write_reg(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value, > > > > > > ComponentRegisters *cregs = &cxl_cstate->crb; > > > > > > uint32_t mask; > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (size == 8) { > > > > > > + switch (size) { > > > > > > + case 4: > > > > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask) != 4); > > > > > > + QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers) != 4); > > > > > > + mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / 4]; > > > > > > + value &= mask; > > > > > > + /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > > > > > + value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4]; > > > > > > + if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > > > > > + cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > > > > > + offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > > > > > + dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > > > > > + } else { > > > > > > + cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / 4] = value; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + return; > > > > > > + case 8: > > > > > > qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > > > > > > "CXL 8 byte cache mem registers not implemented\n"); > > > > > > return; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > - mask = cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_regs_write_mask)]; > > > > > > - value &= mask; > > > > > > - /* RO bits should remain constant. Done by reading existing value */ > > > > > > - value |= ~mask & cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)]; > > > > > > - if (cregs->special_ops && cregs->special_ops->write) { > > > > > > - cregs->special_ops->write(cxl_cstate, offset, value, size); > > > > > > - return; > > > > > > - } > > > > > > - > > > > > > - if (offset >= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER_CAPABILITY && > > > > > > - offset <= A_CXL_HDM_DECODER3_TARGET_LIST_HI) { > > > > > > - dumb_hdm_handler(cxl_cstate, offset, value); > > > > > > - } else { > > > > > > - cregs->cache_mem_registers[offset / sizeof(*cregs->cache_mem_registers)] = value; > > > > > > + default: > > > > > > + /* > > > > > > + * In line with specifiction limitaions on access sizes, this > > > > > > + * routine is not called with other sizes. > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > + g_assert_not_reached(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.39.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 11:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-10-12 14:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] hw/cxl: Line length reduction and related Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] hw/cxl: Use a switch to explicitly check size in caps_reg_read() Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] hw/cxl: Use switch statements for read and write of cachemem registers Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-18 14:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2023-10-18 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-18 16:22 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-18 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-18 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-19 9:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-19 9:09 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-19 9:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2023-10-19 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message] 2023-10-19 11:24 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-19 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-19 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] hw/cxl: CXLDVSECPortExtensions renamed to CXLDVSECPortExt Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-12 14:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] hw/cxl: Line length reductions Jonathan Cameron via 2023-10-12 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-10-13 16:56 ` fan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20231019122448.0000009e@Huawei.com \ --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \ --cc=fan.ni@samsung.com \ --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \ --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=philmd@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).