[PATCH v2 12/13] migration: Use vmstate_register_any() for eeprom93xx

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

We can have more than one eeprom93xx.
For instance:

e100_nic_realize() -> eeprom93xx_new()

Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
---
 hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
index 1081e2cc0d..57d63638d7 100644
--- a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
+++ b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ eeprom_t *eeprom93xx_new(DeviceState *dev, uint16_t nwords)
     /* Output DO is tristate, read results in 1. */
     eeprom->eedo = 1;
     logout("eeprom = 0x%p, nwords = %u\n", eeprom, nwords);
-    vmstate_register(VMSTATE_IF(dev), 0, &vmstate_eeprom, eeprom);
+    vmstate_register_any(VMSTATE_IF(dev), &vmstate_eeprom, eeprom);
     return eeprom;
 }
 
-- 
2.41.0