From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/20] i386/cpu: Fix i/d-cache topology to core level for Intel CPU
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:03:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231024090323.1859210-6-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024090323.1859210-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
For i-cache and d-cache, current QEMU hardcodes the maximum IDs for CPUs
sharing cache (CPUID.04H.00H:EAX[bits 25:14] and CPUID.04H.01H:EAX[bits
25:14]) to 0, and this means i-cache and d-cache are shared in the SMT
level.
This is correct if there's single thread per core, but is wrong for the
hyper threading case (one core contains multiple threads) since the
i-cache and d-cache are shared in the core level other than SMT level.
For AMD CPU, commit 8f4202fb1080 ("i386: Populate AMD Processor Cache
Information for cpuid 0x8000001D") has already introduced i/d cache
topology as core level by default.
Therefore, in order to be compatible with both multi-threaded and
single-threaded situations, we should set i-cache and d-cache be shared
at the core level by default.
This fix changes the default i/d cache topology from per-thread to
per-core. Potentially, this change in L1 cache topology may affect the
performance of the VM if the user does not specifically specify the
topology or bind the vCPU. However, the way to achieve optimal
performance should be to create a reasonable topology and set the
appropriate vCPU affinity without relying on QEMU's default topology
structure.
Fixes: 7e3482f82480 ("i386: Helpers to encode cache information consistently")
Suggested-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
Changes since v3:
* Change the description of current i/d cache encoding status to avoid
misleading to "architectural rules". (Xiaoyao)
Changes since v1:
* Split this fix from the patch named "i386/cpu: Fix number of
addressable IDs in CPUID.04H".
* Add the explanation of the impact on performance. (Xiaoyao)
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 36214c84ec14..a3b170db108e 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -6112,12 +6112,12 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
switch (count) {
case 0: /* L1 dcache info */
encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1d_cache,
- 1, cs->nr_cores,
+ cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
break;
case 1: /* L1 icache info */
encode_cache_cpuid4(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l1i_cache,
- 1, cs->nr_cores,
+ cs->nr_threads, cs->nr_cores,
eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
break;
case 2: /* L2 cache info */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-24 9:03 [PATCH v5 00/20] Support smp.clusters for x86 in QEMU Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] i386: Fix comment style in topology.h Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] tests: Rename test-x86-cpuid.c to test-x86-topo.c Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-10-25 8:22 ` Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] softmmu: Fix CPUSTATE.nr_cores' calculation Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] hw/cpu: Update the comments of nr_cores and nr_dies Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID offset to encode cache topo in CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] i386/cpu: Consolidate the use of topo_info in cpu_x86_cpuid() Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] i386: Split topology types of CPUID[0x1F] from the definitions of CPUID[0xB] Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] i386: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] i386: Introduce module-level cpu topology to CPUX86State Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] i386: Support modules_per_die in X86CPUTopoInfo Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] i386: Expose module level in CPUID[0x1F] Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] i386: Support module_id in X86CPUTopoIDs Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] i386/cpu: Introduce cluster-id to X86CPU Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] hw/i386/pc: Support smp.clusters for x86 PC machine Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] i386: Add cache topology info in CPUCacheInfo Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] i386: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] i386: Use offsets get NumSharingCache for CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2023-10-24 9:03 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] i386: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode " Zhao Liu
2023-10-25 10:04 ` [PATCH v5 00/20] Support smp.clusters for x86 in QEMU Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-25 13:42 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231024090323.1859210-6-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).