From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1qwPAO-0005HU-NS for mharc-qemu-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:54:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwPAB-0003w8-60 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:54:19 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwPA8-0002xW-85 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:54:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1698422054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Jl38o7KrgvZtj4eg7a/TDouHaS5kFEIXQFL4JOtaoac=; b=NWluw0O8K8th7v7KplURTqwlyTseDo0vMnnwDAE0cfC62/n0WEglBWGIiz/uf3hQLSw77N tjSj19KaWzBb5Cqcsc9gWlyontOBou61P+0zo9QvNkuxy2yoECrsvqu7iE5uzI3pkauFmy 0FNktxaydnleq//zxoBeNB2duVVwAQo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-340-0q4kjAKCM6SP-apAgD8jYw-1; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:54:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0q4kjAKCM6SP-apAgD8jYw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23985857CE9; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.fritz.box (unknown [10.39.194.78]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D1B5027; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:54:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, eesposit@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, vsementsov@yandex-team.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 18/24] blkverify: Add locking for request_fn Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:53:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-19-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20231027155333.420094-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20231027155333.420094-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.5 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:54:19 -0000 This is either bdrv_co_preadv() or bdrv_co_pwritev() which both need to have the graph locked. Annotate the function pointer accordingly and add locking to its callers. This shouldn't actually have resulted in a bug because the graph lock is already held by blkverify_co_prwv(), which waits for the coroutines to terminate. Annotate with GRAPH_RDLOCK as well to make this clearer. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- block/blkverify.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blkverify.c b/block/blkverify.c index dae9716a26..9ea2cb4cc5 100644 --- a/block/blkverify.c +++ b/block/blkverify.c @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ typedef struct BlkverifyRequest { uint64_t bytes; int flags; - int (*request_fn)(BdrvChild *, int64_t, int64_t, QEMUIOVector *, - BdrvRequestFlags); + int GRAPH_RDLOCK_PTR (*request_fn)( + BdrvChild *, int64_t, int64_t, QEMUIOVector *, BdrvRequestFlags); int ret; /* test image result */ int raw_ret; /* raw image result */ @@ -170,8 +170,11 @@ static void coroutine_fn blkverify_do_test_req(void *opaque) BlkverifyRequest *r = opaque; BDRVBlkverifyState *s = r->bs->opaque; + bdrv_graph_co_rdlock(); r->ret = r->request_fn(s->test_file, r->offset, r->bytes, r->qiov, r->flags); + bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock(); + r->done++; qemu_coroutine_enter_if_inactive(r->co); } @@ -180,13 +183,16 @@ static void coroutine_fn blkverify_do_raw_req(void *opaque) { BlkverifyRequest *r = opaque; + bdrv_graph_co_rdlock(); r->raw_ret = r->request_fn(r->bs->file, r->offset, r->bytes, r->raw_qiov, r->flags); + bdrv_graph_co_rdunlock(); + r->done++; qemu_coroutine_enter_if_inactive(r->co); } -static int coroutine_fn +static int coroutine_fn GRAPH_RDLOCK blkverify_co_prwv(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkverifyRequest *r, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov, QEMUIOVector *raw_qiov, int flags, bool is_write) @@ -222,7 +228,7 @@ blkverify_co_prwv(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkverifyRequest *r, uint64_t offset, return r->ret; } -static int coroutine_fn +static int coroutine_fn GRAPH_RDLOCK blkverify_co_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov, BdrvRequestFlags flags) { @@ -251,7 +257,7 @@ blkverify_co_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, return ret; } -static int coroutine_fn +static int coroutine_fn GRAPH_RDLOCK blkverify_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov, BdrvRequestFlags flags) { -- 2.41.0