From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0783C47077 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMknP-0001Ud-IQ; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 03:15:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMkn5-0001A8-3s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 03:15:28 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.9]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rMkn2-0008KB-Lb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 03:15:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1704701721; x=1736237721; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2cHMC5a5BJRlD/PsC4aspwTroLUP40TmuAMHURKso6g=; b=XHb7UXzov2AZoqMEfQqHfwEIgPJTW7eEIxP3kPm2FO86LQ2j6o4j75Wd NsJ/zX4acPPQ6CG1UEjdQfWn6+lMumKJP66Aj22KmglNn4AlqaaF+Avqq wkpJOFxR+NYtcHPcGk8LOV61qpvZo8H+hQ+IGosF92nGJnvFruvJBBNcg OxI4ogIYOuWnOHmeR6ESru3fKBFaBlkIyBuOy1w6uVIKsTZ2F7MWP01So 4XZ2YnZISuKWHARFUXN9FzXp9n7EedRjWCYvVk55ExvQacyfBGO7LaPUJ Qjq/sSjXUk5ngnm06qxQUQ6N/ajKxe54WHFqPX6kpTCc03hzuGJh6nLjd g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10946"; a="16420019" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,340,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="16420019" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jan 2024 00:15:15 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,340,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="15850271" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2024 00:15:11 -0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Zhuocheng Ding , Zhao Liu , Yanan Wang , Babu Moger , Yongwei Ma Subject: [PATCH v7 11/16] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 16:27:22 +0800 Message-Id: <20240108082727.420817-12-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240108082727.420817-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240108082727.420817-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=198.175.65.9; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -40 X-Spam_score: -4.1 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.098, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Zhuocheng Ding After i386 supports module level, it's time to add the test for module level's parsing. Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang Tested-by: Babu Moger Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c index f21b8a5d95c2..55b731ccae55 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; @@ -74,13 +75,22 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 33, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 6); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 7, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 8, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 9, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 4); + + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 1); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); /* build a weird topology and see if IDs are calculated correctly @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 6, 3}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_offset(&topo_info), ==, 2); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); -- 2.34.1