From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A901C47422 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNyCz-00078h-5d; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:47:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNyCu-00074g-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:47:06 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNyCs-0003lJ-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:47:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704991621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z9NwLNEMyZKOyFqMVJfX/hLi0hmlFgWeDhvdsupp2Ms=; b=U8qo85jrND5KIk5kl0mqKyc9FWHZerxh//Sf/HmJkwvOgl8IpRr72BHvYlZ7dBgT8o6pgx 2y1dXuC1laU7ES5PgybQdLIyCGZcMwFE3jC7NYhwjOU7JBqqSxm00fGHcdBmU9/m3YfU1L VoPlWrLoS9CFroITJqKYsUUqoQbhviQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-577-la38jOgVO5Og4V71Gkq62w-1; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:46:56 -0500 X-MC-Unique: la38jOgVO5Og4V71Gkq62w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B17310B9489; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.197]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5176C492BC6; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:46:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: Nicholas Piggin , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: devel@lists.libvirt.org, Daniel Henrique Barboza , =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= , David Gibson , Harsh Prateek Bora , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ppc: Rename power5+ and power7+ for the new QOM naming rules Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:46:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20240111164652.908182-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -45 X-Spam_score: -4.6 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.467, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org We can get rid of the "power5+" / "power7+" hack in qom/object.c by using CPU aliases for those names instead (first patch). I think in the long run, we should get rid of the names with a "+" in it completely, so the second patch suggests to deprecate those, but I'd also be fine if we keep the aliases around, so in that case please ignore the second patch. Thomas Huth (2): target/ppc/cpu-models: Rename power5+ and power7+ for new QOM naming rules docs/about: Deprecate the old "power5+" and "power7+" CPU names docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 4 ++-- qom/object.c | 4 ---- target/ppc/cpu-models.c | 10 ++++++---- 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0