From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1EFCC47DA2 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ6dP-0001hT-TY; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:11:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ6dO-0001h2-CO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:11:14 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rQ6dM-0002ZS-Oa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:11:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705500671; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uNRoSKKfn2UrcpTtGU6LeXSKoj9h3oiNpbIkO1sYlFI=; b=QXLRYKhh0+PXVVQ+5utTWUATEP4QnpeaoQ5Q9ptMCuWamiQ2kPZDJzmH2Gxrhyriuca91C Su6Js5DQ9wVMEFStmLMKwYrgEU9BAxo59DzjW/W//5qanYJpQ7sU8qcjuFJnalywOWECYt fbBpRPf77XHDog6DO5LvQ0zLg/SBq2c= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-44-CrCUT98APZyP1wJefz1mwQ-1; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:11:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CrCUT98APZyP1wJefz1mwQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FCDA870829; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF8E1121306; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:11:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: Nicholas Piggin , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: devel@lists.libvirt.org, Daniel Henrique Barboza , =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= , David Gibson , Harsh Prateek Bora , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Thomas Huth Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ppc: Rename power5+ and power7+ for the new QOM naming rules Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 15:10:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20240117141054.73841-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -38 X-Spam_score: -3.9 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.806, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org We can get rid of the "power5+" / "power7+" hack in qom/object.c by using CPU aliases for those names instead (first patch). I think in the long run, we should get rid of the names with a "+" in it completely, so the second patch suggests to deprecate those, but I'd also be fine if we keep the aliases around, so in that case please ignore the second patch. v2: - Use "power5p" / "power7p" instead of "power5plus" / "power7plus" Thomas Huth (2): target/ppc/cpu-models: Rename power5+ and power7+ for new QOM naming rules docs/about: Deprecate the old "power5+" and "power7+" CPU names docs/about/deprecated.rst | 9 +++++++++ hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 4 ++-- qom/object.c | 4 ---- target/ppc/cpu-models.c | 10 ++++++---- 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0