From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] target/i386: pcrel: store low bits of physical address in data[0]
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:51:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240117155143.172890-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
For PC-relative translation blocks, env->eip changes during the
execution of a translation block, Therefore, QEMU must be able to
recover an instruction's PC just from the TranslationBlock struct and
the instruction data with. Because a TB will not span two pages, QEMU
stores all the low bits of EIP in the instruction data and replaces them
in x86_restore_state_to_opc. Bits 12 and higher (which may vary between
executions of a PCREL TB, since these only use the physical address in
the hash key) are kept unmodified from env->eip. The assumption is that
these bits of EIP, unlike bits 0-11, will not change as the translation
block executes.
Unfortunately, this is incorrect when the CS base is not aligned to a page.
Then the linear address of the instructions (i.e. the one with the
CS base addred) indeed will never span two pages, but bits 12+ of EIP
can actually change. For example, if CS base is 0x80262200 and EIP =
0x6FF4, the first instruction in the translation block will be at linear
address 0x802691F4. Even a very small TB will cross to EIP = 0x7xxx,
while the linear addresses will remain comfortably within a single page.
The fix is simply to use the low bits of the linear address for data[0],
since those don't change. Then x86_restore_state_to_opc uses tb->cs_base
to compute a temporary linear address (referring to some unknown
instruction in the TB, but with the correct values of bits 12 and higher);
the low bits are replaced with data[0], and EIP is obtained by subtracting
again the CS base.
Huge thanks to Mark Cave-Ayland for the image and initial debugging,
and to Gitlab user @kjliew for help with bisecting another occurrence
of (hopefully!) the same bug.
It should be relatively easy to write a testcase that performs MMIO on
an EIP with different bits 12+ than the first instruction of the translation
block; any help is welcome.
Fixes: e3a79e0e878 ("target/i386: Enable TARGET_TB_PCREL", 2022-10-11)
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1964
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2012
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
target/i386/tcg/translate.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index 6e881e9e276..fa956d35ecd 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -68,14 +68,26 @@ static void x86_restore_state_to_opc(CPUState *cs,
X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
int cc_op = data[1];
+ uint64_t new_pc;
if (tb_cflags(tb) & CF_PCREL) {
- env->eip = (env->eip & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) | data[0];
- } else if (tb->flags & HF_CS64_MASK) {
- env->eip = data[0];
+ /*
+ * To ensure that bits 0..11 do not change across the translation block,
+ * PC-relative TBs use linear addresses, i.e. addresses that have the CS
+ * base added, for data[0]. Add the CS base back before replacing the
+ * low bits, and subtract it below just like for non-PC-relative TBs.
+ */
+ uint64_t pc = env->eip + tb->cs_base;
+ new_pc = (pc & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) | data[0];
} else {
- env->eip = (uint32_t)(data[0] - tb->cs_base);
+ new_pc = data[0];
}
+ if (tb->flags & HF_CS64_MASK) {
+ env->eip = new_pc;
+ } else {
+ env->eip = (uint32_t)(new_pc - tb->cs_base);
+ }
+
if (cc_op != CC_OP_DYNAMIC) {
env->cc_op = cc_op;
}
diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
index cadf13bce43..e193c74472b 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
@@ -6996,7 +6996,6 @@ static void i386_tr_insn_start(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
dc->prev_insn_end = tcg_last_op();
if (tb_cflags(dcbase->tb) & CF_PCREL) {
- pc_arg -= dc->cs_base;
pc_arg &= ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
}
tcg_gen_insn_start(pc_arg, dc->cc_op);
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 15:51 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-01-17 20:32 ` [PATCH] target/i386: pcrel: store low bits of physical address in data[0] Richard Henderson
2024-01-17 21:13 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-17 15:53 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240117155143.172890-1-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).