From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 315E7C46CD2 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSfcH-0006QO-DU; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:56:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSfcG-0006Pz-H6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:56:40 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSfcE-0003Fv-IL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:56:40 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TKpRD1JDGz6K5df; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:54:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9FF9140A70; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 23:56:34 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.227.76) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:56:34 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:56:33 +0000 To: CC: , , , , , , , , , "Fan Ni" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] hw/mem/cxl_type3: Add DC extent list representative and get DC extent list mailbox support Message-ID: <20240124155633.00002d5f@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20231107180907.553451-7-nifan.cxl@gmail.com> References: <20231107180907.553451-1-nifan.cxl@gmail.com> <20231107180907.553451-7-nifan.cxl@gmail.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.227.76] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jonathan Cameron From: Jonathan Cameron via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 10:07:10 -0800 nifan.cxl@gmail.com wrote: > From: Fan Ni > > Add dynamic capacity extent list representative to the definition of > CXLType3Dev and add get DC extent list mailbox command per > CXL.spec.3.0:.8.2.9.8.9.2. > > Signed-off-by: Fan Ni A few minor comments inline. J > --- > hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/mem/cxl_type3.c | 1 + > include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 23 ++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c > index 1f512b3e6b..56f4aa237a 100644 > --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c > +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ enum { > #define CLEAR_POISON 0x2 > DCD_CONFIG = 0x48, > #define GET_DC_CONFIG 0x0 > + #define GET_DYN_CAP_EXT_LIST 0x1 > PHYSICAL_SWITCH = 0x51, > #define IDENTIFY_SWITCH_DEVICE 0x0 > #define GET_PHYSICAL_PORT_STATE 0x1 > @@ -1286,6 +1287,75 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_config(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd, > return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; > } > > +/* > + * CXL r3.0 section 8.2.9.8.9.2: > + * Get Dynamic Capacity Extent List (Opcode 4810h) 4801h > + */ > +static CXLRetCode cmd_dcd_get_dyn_cap_ext_list(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd, > + uint8_t *payload_in, > + size_t len_in, > + uint8_t *payload_out, > + size_t *len_out, > + CXLCCI *cci) > +{ > + CXLType3Dev *ct3d = CXL_TYPE3(cci->d); > + struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl { > + uint32_t extent_cnt; > + uint32_t start_extent_id; > + } QEMU_PACKED; > + > + struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl { > + uint32_t count; > + uint32_t total_extents; > + uint32_t generation_num; > + uint8_t rsvd[4]; > + CXLDCExtentRaw records[]; > + } QEMU_PACKED; > + > + struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_in_pl *in = (void *)payload_in; > + struct get_dyn_cap_ext_list_out_pl *out = (void *)payload_out; > + uint16_t record_count = 0, i = 0, record_done = 0; > + CXLDCDExtentList *extent_list = &ct3d->dc.extents; > + CXLDCDExtent *ent; > + uint16_t out_pl_len; > + uint32_t start_extent_id = in->start_extent_id; > + > + if (start_extent_id > ct3d->dc.total_extent_count) { > + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT; > + } > + > + record_count = MIN(in->extent_cnt, > + ct3d->dc.total_extent_count - start_extent_id); > + > + out_pl_len = sizeof(*out) + record_count * sizeof(out->records[0]); > + /* May need more processing here in the future */ Not sure what this comment is referring to... I'd be tempted to just remove it. > + assert(out_pl_len <= CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE); > + > + memset(out, 0, out_pl_len); As before. It should be already zeroed. > + stl_le_p(&out->count, record_count); > + stl_le_p(&out->total_extents, ct3d->dc.total_extent_count); > + stl_le_p(&out->generation_num, ct3d->dc.ext_list_gen_seq); > + > + if (record_count > 0) { > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(ent, extent_list, node) { > + if (i++ < start_extent_id) { > + continue; > + } > + stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].start_dpa, ent->start_dpa); > + stq_le_p(&out->records[record_done].len, ent->len); > + memcpy(&out->records[record_done].tag, ent->tag, 0x10); > + stw_le_p(&out->records[record_done].shared_seq, ent->shared_seq); > + record_done++; > + if (record_done == record_count) { > + break; > + } > + } > + } > + > + *len_out = out_pl_len; > + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; > +} > + > diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h > index 3dc6928bc5..5738c6f434 100644 > --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h > +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h > @@ -420,6 +420,25 @@ typedef QLIST_HEAD(, CXLPoison) CXLPoisonList; > > #define DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM 8 > > +typedef struct CXLDCDExtentRaw { > + uint64_t start_dpa; > + uint64_t len; > + uint8_t tag[0x10]; > + uint16_t shared_seq; > + uint8_t rsvd[0x6]; > +} QEMU_PACKED CXLDCExtentRaw; Naming mismatch. > + > +typedef struct CXLDCDExtent { > + uint64_t start_dpa; > + uint64_t len; > + uint8_t tag[0x10]; > + uint16_t shared_seq; > + uint8_t rsvd[0x6]; > + > + QTAILQ_ENTRY(CXLDCDExtent) node; > +} CXLDCDExtent; DCD or DC? I don't really care but inconsistent currently. > +typedef QTAILQ_HEAD(, CXLDCDExtent) CXLDCDExtentList; > + > typedef struct CXLDCDRegion { > uint64_t base; > uint64_t decode_len; /* aligned to 256*MiB */ > @@ -470,6 +489,10 @@ struct CXLType3Dev { > HostMemoryBackend *host_dc; > AddressSpace host_dc_as; > uint64_t total_capacity; /* 256M aligned */ > + CXLDCDExtentList extents; > + > + uint32_t total_extent_count; > + uint32_t ext_list_gen_seq; > > uint8_t num_regions; /* 0-8 regions */ > CXLDCDRegion regions[DCD_MAX_REGION_NUM];