qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Sriram Yagnaraman" <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Klaus Jensen" <its@irrelevant.dk>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] pcie_sriov: Validate NumVFs
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 01:52:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214015107-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214-reuse-v4-5-89ad093a07f4@daynix.com>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 02:13:43PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> The guest may write NumVFs greater than TotalVFs and that can lead
> to buffer overflow in VF implementations.
> 
> Fixes: 7c0fa8dff811 ("pcie: Add support for Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR/IOV)")
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>  hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> index a1fe65f5d801..da209b7f47fd 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev)
>  
>      assert(sriov_cap > 0);
>      num_vfs = pci_get_word(dev->config + sriov_cap + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF);
> +    if (num_vfs > pci_get_word(dev->config + sriov_cap + PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF)) {
> +        return;
> +    }


yes but with your change PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF no longer reflects the
number of registered VFs and that might lead to uninitialized
data read which is not better :(.

How about just forcing the PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF register to be
below PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF at all times?

>      dev->exp.sriov_pf.vf = g_new(PCIDevice *, num_vfs);
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0



  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-14  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14  5:13 [PATCH v4 0/9] hw/pci: SR-IOV related fixes and improvements Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] hw/pci: Use -1 as a default value for rombar Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] hw/pci: Determine if rombar is explicitly enabled Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  6:49   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] vfio: Avoid inspecting option QDict for rombar Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/qdev: Remove opts member Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] pcie_sriov: Validate NumVFs Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  6:52   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2024-02-14 14:49     ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:54       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:22         ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  8:58   ` Michael Tokarev
2024-02-14 14:54     ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:53       ` Michael Tokarev
2024-02-14 15:55         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-17 11:32           ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] pcie_sriov: Reuse SR-IOV VF device instances Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  7:54   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:44     ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] pcie_sriov: Release VFs failed to realize Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  7:54   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14  7:58     ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] pcie_sriov: Do not reset NumVFs after unregistering VFs Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  6:53   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:32     ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:51       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:10         ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  5:13 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] hw/nvme: Refer to dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14  7:07   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:09     ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:46       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:07         ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 16:34           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:51             ` Akihiko Odaki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240214015107-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).