From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Sriram Yagnaraman" <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Klaus Jensen" <its@irrelevant.dk>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] pcie_sriov: Validate NumVFs
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:54:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214105244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbb8562b-6532-45af-a6fe-63bbf9b74a1d@daynix.com>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:49:52PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> On 2024/02/14 15:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 02:13:43PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> > > The guest may write NumVFs greater than TotalVFs and that can lead
> > > to buffer overflow in VF implementations.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7c0fa8dff811 ("pcie: Add support for Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR/IOV)")
> > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> > > ---
> > > hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> > > index a1fe65f5d801..da209b7f47fd 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie_sriov.c
> > > @@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ static void register_vfs(PCIDevice *dev)
> > > assert(sriov_cap > 0);
> > > num_vfs = pci_get_word(dev->config + sriov_cap + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF);
> > > + if (num_vfs > pci_get_word(dev->config + sriov_cap + PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF)) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> >
> >
> > yes but with your change PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF no longer reflects the
> > number of registered VFs and that might lead to uninitialized
> > data read which is not better :(.
> >
> > How about just forcing the PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF register to be
> > below PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF at all times?
>
> PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF is already divergent from the number of registered VFs. It
> may have a number greater than the current registered VFs before setting VF
> Enable.
>
> The guest may also change PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF while VF Enable is set; the
> behavior is undefined in such a case but we still accept such a write. A
> value written in such a case won't be reflected to the actual number of
> enabled VFs.
OK then let's add a comment near num_vfs explaining all this and saying
only to use this value. I also would prefer to have this if
just where we set num_vfs. And maybe after all do set num_vfs to
PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF? Less of a chance of breaking something I feel...
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 5:13 [PATCH v4 0/9] hw/pci: SR-IOV related fixes and improvements Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] hw/pci: Use -1 as a default value for rombar Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] hw/pci: Determine if rombar is explicitly enabled Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 6:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] vfio: Avoid inspecting option QDict for rombar Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/qdev: Remove opts member Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] pcie_sriov: Validate NumVFs Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 6:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:49 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2024-02-14 16:22 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 8:58 ` Michael Tokarev
2024-02-14 14:54 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:53 ` Michael Tokarev
2024-02-14 15:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-17 11:32 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] pcie_sriov: Reuse SR-IOV VF device instances Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 7:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:44 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] pcie_sriov: Release VFs failed to realize Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 7:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 7:58 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] pcie_sriov: Do not reset NumVFs after unregistering VFs Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 6:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:32 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:10 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 5:13 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] hw/nvme: Refer to dev->exp.sriov_pf.num_vfs Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 7:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 14:09 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 15:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:07 ` Akihiko Odaki
2024-02-14 16:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-02-14 16:51 ` Akihiko Odaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240214105244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).