From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Xiaoyao Li" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 10/21] i386: Split topology types of CPUID[0x1F] from the definitions of CPUID[0xB]
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:32:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227103231.1556302-11-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227103231.1556302-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
CPUID[0xB] defines SMT, Core and Invalid types, and this leaf is shared
by Intel and AMD CPUs.
But for extended topology levels, Intel CPU (in CPUID[0x1F]) and AMD CPU
(in CPUID[0x80000026]) have the different definitions with different
enumeration values.
Though CPUID[0x80000026] hasn't been implemented in QEMU, to avoid
possible misunderstanding, split topology types of CPUID[0x1F] from the
definitions of CPUID[0xB] and introduce CPUID[0x1F]-specific topology
types.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
Changes since v8:
* Add Philippe's reviewed-by tag.
Changes since v3:
* New commit to prepare to refactor CPUID[0x1F] encoding.
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 14 +++++++-------
target/i386/cpu.h | 13 +++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 2070d5a91cfa..88dffd2b52e3 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -6258,17 +6258,17 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
case 0:
*eax = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
*ebx = topo_info.threads_per_core;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_SMT;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT << 8;
break;
case 1:
*eax = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info);
*ebx = threads_per_pkg;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_CORE;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE << 8;
break;
default:
*eax = 0;
*ebx = 0;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_INVALID;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID << 8;
}
assert(!(*eax & ~0x1f));
@@ -6293,22 +6293,22 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
case 0:
*eax = apicid_core_offset(&topo_info);
*ebx = topo_info.threads_per_core;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_SMT;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT << 8;
break;
case 1:
*eax = apicid_die_offset(&topo_info);
*ebx = topo_info.cores_per_die * topo_info.threads_per_core;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_CORE;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE << 8;
break;
case 2:
*eax = apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info);
*ebx = threads_per_pkg;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DIE;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE << 8;
break;
default:
*eax = 0;
*ebx = 0;
- *ecx |= CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_INVALID;
+ *ecx |= CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID << 8;
}
assert(!(*eax & ~0x1f));
*ebx &= 0xffff; /* The count doesn't need to be reliable. */
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
index 4592353616f9..4a55fef1feea 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
@@ -1017,10 +1017,15 @@ uint64_t x86_cpu_get_supported_feature_word(FeatureWord w,
#define CPUID_MWAIT_EMX (1U << 0) /* enumeration supported */
/* CPUID[0xB].ECX level types */
-#define CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_INVALID (0U << 8)
-#define CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_SMT (1U << 8)
-#define CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_CORE (2U << 8)
-#define CPUID_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DIE (5U << 8)
+#define CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID 0
+#define CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT 1
+#define CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE 2
+
+/* COUID[0x1F].ECX level types */
+#define CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID
+#define CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT
+#define CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE CPUID_B_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE
+#define CPUID_1F_ECX_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE 5
/* MSR Feature Bits */
#define MSR_ARCH_CAP_RDCL_NO (1U << 0)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-27 10:32 [PATCH v9 00/21] Introduce smp.modules for x86 in QEMU Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 01/21] hw/core/machine: Introduce the module as a CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 02/21] hw/core/machine: Support modules in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 9:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-03-11 10:22 ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-03-12 10:12 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 03/21] hw/core: Introduce module-id as the topology subindex Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 9:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 04/21] hw/core: Support module-id in numa configuration Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 05/21] i386/cpu: Fix i/d-cache topology to core level for Intel CPU Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 06/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info to encode cache topo in CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:39 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-10 13:38 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 8:23 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 9:03 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-12 9:04 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 07/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info get NumSharingCache for CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:13 ` Moger, Babu
2024-03-09 13:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 08/21] i386/cpu: Consolidate the use of topo_info in cpu_x86_cpuid() Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:48 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-10 13:44 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 09/21] i386/cpu: Introduce bitmap to cache available CPU topology levels Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 6:28 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-11 8:19 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 11/21] i386/cpu: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level Zhao Liu
2024-03-11 8:45 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-03-12 10:11 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 12/21] i386: Introduce module level cpu topology to CPUX86State Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 13/21] i386: Support modules_per_die in X86CPUTopoInfo Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 14/21] i386: Expose module level in CPUID[0x1F] Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 15/21] i386: Support module_id in X86CPUTopoIDs Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 16/21] i386/cpu: Introduce module-id to X86CPU Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 17/21] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 18/21] hw/i386/pc: Support smp.modules for x86 PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 21:22 ` Moger, Babu
2024-02-29 7:32 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:11 ` Moger, Babu
2024-03-01 6:27 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 19/21] i386: Add cache topology info in CPUCacheInfo Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 20/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:32 ` [PATCH v9 21/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:11 ` Moger, Babu
2024-02-27 10:41 ` [PATCH v9 00/21] Introduce smp.modules for x86 in QEMU Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 15:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-29 15:14 ` Moger, Babu
2024-03-08 16:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-09 0:49 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-10 13:06 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240227103231.1556302-11-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhuocheng.ding@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).