From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
devel@lists.libvirt.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" SMP configurations
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:53:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240306095407.3058909-3-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306095407.3058909-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Currentlt, it was allowed for users to specify the unsupported
topology parameter as "1". For example, x86 PC machine doesn't
support drawer/book/cluster topology levels, but user could specify
"-smp drawers=1,books=1,clusters=1".
This is meaningless and confusing, so that the support for this kind of
configurations is marked depresated since 9.0. And report warning
message for such case like:
qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
Unsupported clusters parameter mustn't be specified as 1
qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
Unsupported books parameter mustn't be specified as 1
qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
Unsupported drawers parameter mustn't be specified as 1
Users have to ensure that all the topology members described with -smp
are supported by the target machine.
Cc: devel@lists.libvirt.org
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
---
docs/about/deprecated.rst | 14 +++++++++
hw/core/machine-smp.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 872974640252..2e782e83e952 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -47,6 +47,20 @@ as short-form boolean values, and passed to plugins as ``arg_name=on``.
However, short-form booleans are deprecated and full explicit ``arg_name=on``
form is preferred.
+``-smp`` (Unsopported "parameter=1" SMP configurations) (since 9.0)
+'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+Specified CPU topology parameters must be supported by the machine.
+
+In the SMP configuration, users should provide the CPU topology parameters that
+are supported by the target machine.
+
+However, historically it was allowed for users to specify the unsupported
+topology parameter as "1", which is meaningless. So support for this kind of
+configurations (e.g. -smp drawers=1,books=1,clusters=1 for x86 PC machine) is
+marked depresated since 9.0, users have to ensure that all the topology members
+described with -smp are supported by the target machine.
+
QEMU Machine Protocol (QMP) commands
------------------------------------
diff --git a/hw/core/machine-smp.c b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
index 96533886b14e..50a5a40dbc3d 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine-smp.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
@@ -112,30 +112,61 @@ void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms,
/*
* If not supported by the machine, a topology parameter must be
- * omitted or specified equal to 1.
+ * omitted.
*/
- if (!mc->smp_props.dies_supported && dies > 1) {
- error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
- return;
- }
- if (!mc->smp_props.clusters_supported && clusters > 1) {
- error_setg(errp, "clusters not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
- return;
+ if (!mc->smp_props.clusters_supported && config->has_clusters) {
+ if (config->clusters > 1) {
+ error_setg(errp, "clusters not supported by this "
+ "machine's CPU topology");
+ return;
+ } else {
+ /* Here clusters only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
+ warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
+ "Unsupported clusters parameter mustn't be "
+ "specified as 1");
+ }
}
+ clusters = clusters > 0 ? clusters : 1;
+ if (!mc->smp_props.dies_supported && config->has_dies) {
+ if (config->dies > 1) {
+ error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this "
+ "machine's CPU topology");
+ return;
+ } else {
+ /* Here dies only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
+ warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
+ "Unsupported dies parameter mustn't be "
+ "specified as 1");
+ }
+ }
dies = dies > 0 ? dies : 1;
- clusters = clusters > 0 ? clusters : 1;
- if (!mc->smp_props.books_supported && books > 1) {
- error_setg(errp, "books not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
- return;
+ if (!mc->smp_props.books_supported && config->has_books) {
+ if (config->books > 1) {
+ error_setg(errp, "books not supported by this "
+ "machine's CPU topology");
+ return;
+ } else {
+ /* Here books only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
+ warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
+ "Unsupported books parameter mustn't be "
+ "specified as 1");
+ }
}
books = books > 0 ? books : 1;
- if (!mc->smp_props.drawers_supported && drawers > 1) {
- error_setg(errp,
- "drawers not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
- return;
+ if (!mc->smp_props.drawers_supported && config->has_drawers) {
+ if (config->drawers > 1) {
+ error_setg(errp, "drawers not supported by this "
+ "machine's CPU topology");
+ return;
+ } else {
+ /* Here drawers only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
+ warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
+ "Unsupported drawers parameter mustn't be "
+ "specified as 1");
+ }
}
drawers = drawers > 0 ? drawers : 1;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 9:53 [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup on SMP and its test Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Remove deprecated "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:53 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-03-07 6:22 ` [PATCH 02/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" " Thomas Huth
2024-03-07 7:07 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Simplify variables' initialization in machine_parse_smp_config() Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 13:20 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-08 15:33 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-10 11:55 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-11 5:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-13 10:52 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-18 8:06 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-18 11:18 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Calculate total CPUs once " Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 20:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Drop the unsupported "dies=1" case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 13:22 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 07/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:01 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-07 7:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 08/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 09/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 10/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 11/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:07 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 12/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 13/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test smp_props.has_clusters Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 14/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06 21:07 ` [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup on SMP and its test Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-07 7:25 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240306095407.3058909-3-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).