From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test smp_props.has_clusters
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 00:01:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240308160148.3130837-13-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308160148.3130837-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
The smp_props.has_clusters in MachineClass is not a user configured
field, and it indicates if user specifies "clusters" in -smp.
After -smp parsing, other module could aware if the cluster level
is configured by user. This is used when the machine has only 1 cluster
since there's only 1 cluster by default.
Add the check to cover this field.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
index 75581691713c..d39cfdc19bfe 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
@@ -573,7 +573,8 @@ static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_cores_per_socket(const CpuTopology *topo)
static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CpuTopology *topo,
unsigned int threads_per_socket,
- unsigned int cores_per_socket)
+ unsigned int cores_per_socket,
+ bool has_clusters)
{
return g_strdup_printf(
"(CpuTopology) {\n"
@@ -588,17 +589,20 @@ static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CpuTopology *topo,
" .max_cpus = %u,\n"
" .threads_per_socket = %u,\n"
" .cores_per_socket = %u,\n"
+ " .has_clusters = %s,\n"
"}",
topo->cpus, topo->drawers, topo->books,
topo->sockets, topo->dies, topo->clusters,
topo->cores, topo->threads, topo->max_cpus,
- threads_per_socket, cores_per_socket);
+ threads_per_socket, cores_per_socket,
+ has_clusters ? "true" : "false");
}
static void check_parse(MachineState *ms, const SMPConfiguration *config,
const CpuTopology *expect_topo, const char *expect_err,
bool is_valid)
{
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
g_autofree char *config_str = smp_config_to_string(config);
g_autofree char *expect_topo_str = NULL, *output_topo_str = NULL;
unsigned int expect_threads_per_socket, expect_cores_per_socket;
@@ -611,15 +615,18 @@ static void check_parse(MachineState *ms, const SMPConfiguration *config,
cpu_topology_get_cores_per_socket(expect_topo);
expect_topo_str = cpu_topology_to_string(expect_topo,
expect_threads_per_socket,
- expect_cores_per_socket);
+ expect_cores_per_socket,
+ config->has_clusters);
/* call the generic parser */
machine_parse_smp_config(ms, config, &err);
ms_threads_per_socket = machine_topo_get_threads_per_socket(ms);
ms_cores_per_socket = machine_topo_get_cores_per_socket(ms);
- output_topo_str = cpu_topology_to_string(&ms->smp, ms_threads_per_socket,
- ms_cores_per_socket);
+ output_topo_str = cpu_topology_to_string(&ms->smp,
+ ms_threads_per_socket,
+ ms_cores_per_socket,
+ mc->smp_props.has_clusters);
/* when the configuration is supposed to be valid */
if (is_valid) {
@@ -634,7 +641,8 @@ static void check_parse(MachineState *ms, const SMPConfiguration *config,
(ms->smp.threads == expect_topo->threads) &&
(ms->smp.max_cpus == expect_topo->max_cpus) &&
(ms_threads_per_socket == expect_threads_per_socket) &&
- (ms_cores_per_socket == expect_cores_per_socket)) {
+ (ms_cores_per_socket == expect_cores_per_socket) &&
+ (mc->smp_props.has_clusters == config->has_clusters)) {
return;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 16:01 [PATCH v2 00/13] Cleanup on SMP and its test Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Remove deprecated "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:12 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] hw/core/machine-smp: Calculate total CPUs once in machine_parse_smp_config() Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Drop the unsupported "dies=1" case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:01 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-03-08 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 16:31 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Cleanup on SMP and its test Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-09 0:46 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-09 13:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-10 13:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-12 6:46 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-12 6:43 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240308160148.3130837-13-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).