From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82795C5475B for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ricSW-0000ca-PT; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:48:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ricSU-0000by-QX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:48:30 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.21]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ricST-000417-9O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 10:48:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709912910; x=1741448910; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6WGcGPLsmeM9ujwFnIiG1nYtUcObQiTkGIz1UZVazz0=; b=S0HgMHGVoCHpRi0IZ+DTLdewIYp+bwaaW6KwzNn2n+nsVf1otiHZJo0F 45S/Jw4efojA6lgFHWpL32tbWQfKR9SDmVgjmHi5114+8WVv7VUBeZWLo jeRKLyDkqfLNI4Rf4metBc5GA8UcpSg3SEi94Jtapogk4Fo1xoqf71HK7 0wZ5nTtw6Nw+6g8XZRf6X/scvkZugQX1eHVjSx1HfDH9id70a+x+VhIR2 kxyMc5cDcrWfzi1Exb9TnIcc2HpXfbhArTGvtPs0Ouh6Ljbc8EtRPifbP yf48aMMQd4z0ZxLB9BkmXPV2Gm2FZfyBRQg86tQwvHQP8qAWvAHyO/UXl Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11006"; a="4561053" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,110,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="4561053" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Mar 2024 07:48:27 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,110,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10400332" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2024 07:48:24 -0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Thomas Huth , Igor Mammedov , Prasad Pandit , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Xiaoling Song , Zhao Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 05/13] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 00:01:40 +0800 Message-Id: <20240308160148.3130837-6-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240308160148.3130837-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240308160148.3130837-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=198.175.65.21; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.572, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Zhao Liu Use MAX_CPUS/MIN_CPUS macros in invalid topology case. This gives us the flexibility to change the maximum and minimum CPU limits. Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Tested-by: Xiaoling Song Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth --- tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c index 1874bea08609..84e342277452 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c @@ -323,15 +323,21 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_invalid[] = { "sockets (2) * cores (4) * threads (2) " "== maxcpus (16) < smp_cpus (18)", }, { - /* config: -smp 1 - * should tweak the supported min CPUs to 2 for testing */ - .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, 1, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), + /* + * config: -smp 1 + * The test machine should tweak the supported min CPUs to + * 2 (MIN_CPUS + 1) for testing. + */ + .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, MIN_CPUS, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), .expect_error = "Invalid SMP CPUs 1. The min CPUs supported " "by machine '" SMP_MACHINE_NAME "' is 2", }, { - /* config: -smp 512 - * should tweak the supported max CPUs to 511 for testing */ - .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, 512, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), + /* + * config: -smp 512 + * The test machine should tweak the supported max CPUs to + * 511 (MAX_CPUS - 1) for testing. + */ + .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, MAX_CPUS, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), .expect_error = "Invalid SMP CPUs 512. The max CPUs supported " "by machine '" SMP_MACHINE_NAME "' is 511", }, @@ -575,8 +581,8 @@ static void machine_generic_invalid_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc); /* Force invalid min CPUs and max CPUs */ - mc->min_cpus = 2; - mc->max_cpus = 511; + mc->min_cpus = MIN_CPUS + 1; + mc->max_cpus = MAX_CPUS - 1; } static void machine_with_dies_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) -- 2.34.1