From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D26BC5475B for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjWJ1-0008QC-TP; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:26:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjWIy-0008Ca-Ih; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:26:24 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjWIt-0008EJ-JH; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:26:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710127579; x=1741663579; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=afLKbE/iqvhvdNRjIYrME9QDTzP57P9JV3IjhSBD68c=; b=ZMZMosg4WIJRlRx05pQUpTumF9bB2piYbIc/QIimkGN8VIhjfIc5vBYJ 9LVOP/XdMyPnBR2fNHGsLwxN9/gyCfBO15lgkP/vqYZaseepOq4ARbVAr wuw/cWjPptmPVNk6vxcgNGRJN+ne5Y9IF0tVfq+OlgMsb9h46dgS+Npnd bi5ftKO62KF7DhZe4azhDx/oLJ9BO/BHQrUIEZRoY0cLi53zWVcqP+F9U SELrSczo+QMhw05VC7jBngXpQPxOPa669ddXi10CnFbucFaqvGpbFteN5 vOmViUNpgPrI3yR0qA1zSZD12j7ZUy9dSpEgZNQhea9fq8r5g9AQQnZ6n Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11009"; a="22229819" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,115,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="22229819" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2024 20:25:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,115,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="15594055" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2024 20:25:47 -0700 From: Zhao Liu To: Thomas Huth , Markus Armbruster , Michael Roth , Michael Tokarev , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Zhao Liu , Alex Williamson , =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= Subject: [PATCH v2 22/29] hw/vfio/pci-quirks: Fix missing ERRP_GUARD() for error_prepend() Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:38:15 +0800 Message-Id: <20240311033822.3142585-23-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240311033822.3142585-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240311033822.3142585-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=198.175.65.10; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.945, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Zhao Liu As the comment in qapi/error, passing @errp to error_prepend() requires ERRP_GUARD(): * = Why, when and how to use ERRP_GUARD() = * * Without ERRP_GUARD(), use of the @errp parameter is restricted: ... * - It should not be passed to error_prepend(), error_vprepend() or * error_append_hint(), because that doesn't work with &error_fatal. * ERRP_GUARD() lifts these restrictions. * * To use ERRP_GUARD(), add it right at the beginning of the function. * @errp can then be used without worrying about the argument being * NULL or &error_fatal. ERRP_GUARD() could avoid the case when @errp is &error_fatal, the user can't see this additional information, because exit() happens in error_setg earlier than information is added [1]. In hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c, there are 2 functions passing @errp to error_prepend() without ERRP_GUARD(): - vfio_add_nv_gpudirect_cap() - vfio_add_vmd_shadow_cap() There are too many possible callers to check the impact of this defect; it may or may not be harmless. Thus it is necessary to protect their @errp with ERRP_GUARD(). To avoid the issue like [1] said, add missing ERRP_GUARD() at the beginning of this function. [1]: Issue description in the commit message of commit ae7c80a7bd73 ("error: New macro ERRP_GUARD()"). Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: "Cédric Le Goater" Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater --- v2: Use Markus' sentence to polish commit message. (Markus) --- hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c b/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c index 84b1a7b9485c..496fd1ee86bd 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c +++ b/hw/vfio/pci-quirks.c @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static bool is_valid_std_cap_offset(uint8_t pos) static int vfio_add_nv_gpudirect_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) { + ERRP_GUARD(); PCIDevice *pdev = &vdev->pdev; int ret, pos; bool c8_conflict = false, d4_conflict = false; @@ -1630,6 +1631,7 @@ static int vfio_add_nv_gpudirect_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) #define VMD_SHADOW_CAP_LEN 24 static int vfio_add_vmd_shadow_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp) { + ERRP_GUARD(); uint8_t membar_phys[16]; int ret, pos = 0xE8; -- 2.34.1