qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] tests/unit: Remove debug statements in test-nested-aio-poll.c
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:22:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240422112246.83812-1-philmd@linaro.org> (raw)

We have been running this test for almost a year; it
is safe to remove its debug statements, which clutter
CI jobs output:

  ▶  88/100 /nested-aio-poll                      OK
  io_read 0x16bb26158
  io_poll_true 0x16bb26158
  > io_poll_ready
  io_read 0x16bb26164
  < io_poll_ready
  io_poll_true 0x16bb26158
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  > io_poll_ready
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_poll_false 0x16bb26164
  io_read 0x16bb26164
  < io_poll_ready
  88/100 qemu:unit / test-nested-aio-poll        OK

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
---
 tests/unit/test-nested-aio-poll.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/unit/test-nested-aio-poll.c b/tests/unit/test-nested-aio-poll.c
index db33742af3..d8fd92c43b 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-nested-aio-poll.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-nested-aio-poll.c
@@ -30,19 +30,16 @@ typedef struct {
 
 static void io_read(EventNotifier *notifier)
 {
-    fprintf(stderr, "%s %p\n", __func__, notifier);
     event_notifier_test_and_clear(notifier);
 }
 
 static bool io_poll_true(void *opaque)
 {
-    fprintf(stderr, "%s %p\n", __func__, opaque);
     return true;
 }
 
 static bool io_poll_false(void *opaque)
 {
-    fprintf(stderr, "%s %p\n", __func__, opaque);
     return false;
 }
 
@@ -50,8 +47,6 @@ static void io_poll_ready(EventNotifier *notifier)
 {
     TestData *td = container_of(notifier, TestData, poll_notifier);
 
-    fprintf(stderr, "> %s\n", __func__);
-
     g_assert(!td->nested);
     td->nested = true;
 
@@ -62,8 +57,6 @@ static void io_poll_ready(EventNotifier *notifier)
     g_assert(aio_poll(td->ctx, true));
 
     td->nested = false;
-
-    fprintf(stderr, "< %s\n", __func__);
 }
 
 /* dummy_notifier never triggers */
-- 
2.41.0



             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22 11:22 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2024-04-22 15:37 ` [PATCH v2] tests/unit: Remove debug statements in test-nested-aio-poll.c Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240422112246.83812-1-philmd@linaro.org \
    --to=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).