From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 16/21] i386/cpu: Introduce module-id to X86CPU
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:49:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424154929.1487382-17-zhao1.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424154929.1487382-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Introduce module-id to be consistent with the module-id field in
CpuInstanceProperties.
Following the legacy smp check rules, also add the module_id validity
into x86_cpu_pre_plug().
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
---
Changes since v7:
* Introduced module_id instead of cluster_id.
* Dropped Michael/Babu's ACKed/Tested tags since the code change.
* Re-added Yongwei's Tested tag For his re-testing.
Changes since v6:
* Updated the comment when check cluster-id. Since there's no
v8.2, the cluster-id support should at least start from v9.0.
Changes since v5:
* Updated the comment when check cluster-id. Since current QEMU is
v8.2, the cluster-id support should at least start from v8.3.
Changes since v3:
* Used the imperative in the commit message. (Babu)
---
hw/i386/x86.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
target/i386/cpu.c | 2 ++
target/i386/cpu.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
index fecff4d833c6..b1106ccb1d70 100644
--- a/hw/i386/x86.c
+++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
@@ -343,6 +343,14 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
cpu->die_id = 0;
}
+ /*
+ * module-id was optional in QEMU 9.0 and older, so keep it optional
+ * if there's only one module per die.
+ */
+ if (cpu->module_id < 0 && ms->smp.modules == 1) {
+ cpu->module_id = 0;
+ }
+
if (cpu->socket_id < 0) {
error_setg(errp, "CPU socket-id is not set");
return;
@@ -359,6 +367,14 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
cpu->die_id, ms->smp.dies - 1);
return;
}
+ if (cpu->module_id < 0) {
+ error_setg(errp, "CPU module-id is not set");
+ return;
+ } else if (cpu->module_id > ms->smp.modules - 1) {
+ error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU module-id: %u must be in range 0:%u",
+ cpu->module_id, ms->smp.modules - 1);
+ return;
+ }
if (cpu->core_id < 0) {
error_setg(errp, "CPU core-id is not set");
return;
@@ -378,16 +394,9 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
topo_ids.pkg_id = cpu->socket_id;
topo_ids.die_id = cpu->die_id;
+ topo_ids.module_id = cpu->module_id;
topo_ids.core_id = cpu->core_id;
topo_ids.smt_id = cpu->thread_id;
-
- /*
- * TODO: This is the temporary initialization for topo_ids.module_id to
- * avoid "maybe-uninitialized" compilation errors. Will remove when
- * X86CPU supports module_id.
- */
- topo_ids.module_id = 0;
-
cpu->apic_id = x86_apicid_from_topo_ids(&topo_info, &topo_ids);
}
@@ -432,6 +441,14 @@ void x86_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
}
cpu->die_id = topo_ids.die_id;
+ if (cpu->module_id != -1 && cpu->module_id != topo_ids.module_id) {
+ error_setg(errp, "property module-id: %u doesn't match set apic-id:"
+ " 0x%x (module-id: %u)", cpu->module_id, cpu->apic_id,
+ topo_ids.module_id);
+ return;
+ }
+ cpu->module_id = topo_ids.module_id;
+
if (cpu->core_id != -1 && cpu->core_id != topo_ids.core_id) {
error_setg(errp, "property core-id: %u doesn't match set apic-id:"
" 0x%x (core-id: %u)", cpu->core_id, cpu->apic_id,
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index a637a8ad8f51..76085ec007fa 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -8102,12 +8102,14 @@ static Property x86_cpu_properties[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("apic-id", X86CPU, apic_id, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("thread-id", X86CPU, thread_id, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("core-id", X86CPU, core_id, 0),
+ DEFINE_PROP_INT32("module-id", X86CPU, module_id, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("die-id", X86CPU, die_id, 0),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("socket-id", X86CPU, socket_id, 0),
#else
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("apic-id", X86CPU, apic_id, UNASSIGNED_APIC_ID),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("thread-id", X86CPU, thread_id, -1),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("core-id", X86CPU, core_id, -1),
+ DEFINE_PROP_INT32("module-id", X86CPU, module_id, -1),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("die-id", X86CPU, die_id, -1),
DEFINE_PROP_INT32("socket-id", X86CPU, socket_id, -1),
#endif
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
index b0ecf90460ab..042eec417d0f 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
@@ -2059,6 +2059,7 @@ struct ArchCPU {
int32_t node_id; /* NUMA node this CPU belongs to */
int32_t socket_id;
int32_t die_id;
+ int32_t module_id;
int32_t core_id;
int32_t thread_id;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 15:49 [PATCH v11 00/21] i386: Introduce smp.modules and clean up cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 01/21] hw/core/machine: Introduce the module as a CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 02/21] hw/core/machine: Support modules in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 03/21] hw/core: Introduce module-id as the topology subindex Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 04/21] hw/core: Support module-id in numa configuration Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 05/21] i386/cpu: Fix i/d-cache topology to core level for Intel CPU Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 06/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info to encode cache topo in CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 07/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info get NumSharingCache for CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 08/21] i386/cpu: Consolidate the use of topo_info in cpu_x86_cpuid() Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 09/21] i386/cpu: Introduce bitmap to cache available CPU topology levels Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 10/21] i386: Split topology types of CPUID[0x1F] from the definitions of CPUID[0xB] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 11/21] i386/cpu: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 12/21] i386: Introduce module level cpu topology to CPUX86State Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 13/21] i386: Support modules_per_die in X86CPUTopoInfo Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 14/21] i386: Expose module level in CPUID[0x1F] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 15/21] i386: Support module_id in X86CPUTopoIDs Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 17/21] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 18/21] hw/i386/pc: Support smp.modules for x86 PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 19/21] i386: Add cache topology info in CPUCacheInfo Zhao Liu
2024-04-30 6:14 ` Tejus GK
2024-05-06 7:32 ` Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 20/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 21/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-04-25 8:06 ` [PATCH v11 00/21] i386: Introduce smp.modules and clean up cache topology Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-04-25 13:30 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-15 14:48 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424154929.1487382-17-zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhuocheng.ding@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).