qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	cfontana@suse.de, xiaoyao.li@intel.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org,
	seanjc@google.com, zhao1.liu@intel.com,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] target/i386: Advertise MWAIT iff host supports
Date: Mon,  3 Jun 2024 17:02:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604000222.75065-3-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240604000222.75065-1-zide.chen@intel.com>

host_cpu_realizefn() sets CPUID_EXT_MONITOR without consulting host/KVM
capabilities. This may cause problems:

- If MWAIT/MONITOR is not available on the host, advertising this
  feature to the guest and executing MWAIT/MONITOR from the guest
  triggers #UD and the guest doesn't boot.  This is because typically
  #UD takes priority over VM-Exit interception checks and KVM doesn't
  emulate MONITOR/MWAIT on #UD.

- If KVM doesn't support KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT, MWAIT/MONITOR
  from the guest are intercepted by KVM, which is not what cpu-pm=on
  intends to do.

In these cases, MWAIT/MONITOR should not be exposed to the guest.

The logic in kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid() to handle CPUID_EXT_MONITOR
is correct and sufficient, and we can't set CPUID_EXT_MONITOR after
x86_cpu_filter_features().

This was not an issue before commit 662175b91ff ("i386: reorder call to
cpu_exec_realizefn") because the feature added in the accel-specific
realizefn could be checked against host availability and filtered out.

Additionally, it seems not a good idea to handle guest CPUID leaves in
host_cpu_realizefn(), and this patch merges host_cpu_enable_cpu_pm()
into kvm_cpu_realizefn().

Fixes: f5cc5a5c1686 ("i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c, using AccelCPUClass")
Fixes: 662175b91ff2 ("i386: reorder call to cpu_exec_realizefn")
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---

V3:
- don't set CPUID_EXT_MONITOR in kvm_cpu_realizefn().
- Change title to reflect the main purpose of this patch.

 target/i386/host-cpu.c    | 12 ------------
 target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 11 +++++++++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/host-cpu.c b/target/i386/host-cpu.c
index 280e427c017c..8b8bf5afeccf 100644
--- a/target/i386/host-cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/host-cpu.c
@@ -42,15 +42,6 @@ static uint32_t host_cpu_phys_bits(void)
     return host_phys_bits;
 }
 
-static void host_cpu_enable_cpu_pm(X86CPU *cpu)
-{
-    CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
-
-    host_cpuid(5, 0, &cpu->mwait.eax, &cpu->mwait.ebx,
-               &cpu->mwait.ecx, &cpu->mwait.edx);
-    env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] |= CPUID_EXT_MONITOR;
-}
-
 static uint32_t host_cpu_adjust_phys_bits(X86CPU *cpu)
 {
     uint32_t host_phys_bits = host_cpu_phys_bits();
@@ -83,9 +74,6 @@ bool host_cpu_realizefn(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
     X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
     CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
 
-    if (cpu->max_features && enable_cpu_pm) {
-        host_cpu_enable_cpu_pm(cpu);
-    }
     if (env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] & CPUID_EXT2_LM) {
         uint32_t phys_bits = host_cpu_adjust_phys_bits(cpu);
 
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index f76972e47e61..148d10ce3711 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -65,8 +65,15 @@ static bool kvm_cpu_realizefn(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
      *   cpu_common_realizefn() (via xcc->parent_realize)
      */
     if (cpu->max_features) {
-        if (enable_cpu_pm && kvm_has_waitpkg()) {
-            env->features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] |= CPUID_7_0_ECX_WAITPKG;
+        if (enable_cpu_pm) {
+            if (kvm_has_waitpkg()) {
+                env->features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] |= CPUID_7_0_ECX_WAITPKG;
+            }
+
+            if (env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] & CPUID_EXT_MONITOR) {
+                host_cpuid(5, 0, &cpu->mwait.eax, &cpu->mwait.ebx,
+                           &cpu->mwait.ecx, &cpu->mwait.edx);
+	    }
         }
         if (cpu->ucode_rev == 0) {
             cpu->ucode_rev =
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-04  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-04  0:02 [PATCH V3 0/2] improve -overcommit cpu-pm=on|off Zide Chen
2024-06-04  0:02 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] vl: Allow multiple -overcommit commands Zide Chen
2024-06-05 13:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2024-06-04  0:02 ` Zide Chen [this message]
2024-06-04  4:02   ` [PATCH V3 2/2] target/i386: Advertise MWAIT iff host supports Zhao Liu
2024-06-04 15:08   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-06-05 13:41   ` Igor Mammedov
2024-06-05 13:49 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] improve -overcommit cpu-pm=on|off Igor Mammedov
2024-06-05 18:33   ` Chen, Zide
2024-06-17 12:47 ` Michael Tokarev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240604000222.75065-3-zide.chen@intel.com \
    --to=zide.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=cfontana@suse.de \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).