From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hw/virtio: Fix the de-initialization of vhost-user devices
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:19:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240618121958.88673-1-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)
The unrealize functions of the various vhost-user devices are
calling the corresponding vhost_*_set_status() functions with a
status of 0 to shut down the device correctly.
Now these vhost_*_set_status() functions all follow this scheme:
bool should_start = virtio_device_should_start(vdev, status);
if (vhost_dev_is_started(&vvc->vhost_dev) == should_start) {
return;
}
if (should_start) {
/* ... do the initialization stuff ... */
} else {
/* ... do the cleanup stuff ... */
}
The problem here is virtio_device_should_start(vdev, 0) currently
always returns "true" since it internally only looks at vdev->started
instead of looking at the "status" parameter. Thus once the device
got started once, virtio_device_should_start() always returns true
and thus the vhost_*_set_status() functions return early, without
ever doing any clean-up when being called with status == 0. This
causes e.g. problems when trying to hot-plug and hot-unplug a vhost
user devices multiple times since the de-initialization step is
completely skipped during the unplug operation.
This bug has been introduced in commit 9f6bcfd99f ("hw/virtio: move
vm_running check to virtio_device_started") which replaced
should_start = status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK;
with
should_start = virtio_device_started(vdev, status);
which later got replaced by virtio_device_should_start(). This blocked
the possibility to set should_start to false in case the status flag
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK was not set.
Fix it by adjusting the virtio_device_should_start() function to
only consider the status flag instead of vdev->started. Since this
function is only used in the various vhost_*_set_status() functions
for exactly the same purpose, it should be fine to fix it in this
central place there without any risk to change the behavior of other
code.
Fixes: 9f6bcfd99f ("hw/virtio: move vm_running check to virtio_device_started")
Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-40708
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
index 7d5ffdc145..2eafad17b8 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
@@ -470,9 +470,9 @@ static inline bool virtio_device_started(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t status)
* @vdev - the VirtIO device
* @status - the devices status bits
*
- * This is similar to virtio_device_started() but also encapsulates a
- * check on the VM status which would prevent a device starting
- * anyway.
+ * This is similar to virtio_device_started() but ignores vdev->started
+ * and also encapsulates a check on the VM status which would prevent a
+ * device from starting anyway.
*/
static inline bool virtio_device_should_start(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t status)
{
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static inline bool virtio_device_should_start(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t status
return false;
}
- return virtio_device_started(vdev, status);
+ return status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK;
}
static inline void virtio_set_started(VirtIODevice *vdev, bool started)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 12:19 Thomas Huth [this message]
2024-06-18 13:44 ` [PATCH] hw/virtio: Fix the de-initialization of vhost-user devices Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-07-01 14:07 ` Thomas Huth
2024-07-01 15:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-07-01 16:06 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240618121958.88673-1-thuth@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).