From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F178C3DA64 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sY5ks-00018L-5l; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:24:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sY5kn-000167-9p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:24:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sY5kj-0004mS-DV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:24:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722180242; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5bC7CjlZdsdHI4lvHiT2ExOZBWJ7XMhmuhfoptCNZqw=; b=dcT+0eM8BW7APhf0SQlvSFgEGeGTGM2vi8sD/0ZaVLUCS96cyeSh5EAC6kCj6QYNaxx/WI Afl6CtwiI08M/Tf1qwzRF1Pq9MnTpfkALAjRMU7knEbxZ2w1eWQBnxN9KIljmvF17lEMZ5 kixlI7Ox6S1Mzcht22PUMcTldXuNNXU= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-151-q6kKUKrvNi-YU1BWGd0X8w-1; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:24:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: q6kKUKrvNi-YU1BWGd0X8w-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52e9557e312so2126017e87.0 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722180239; x=1722785039; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5bC7CjlZdsdHI4lvHiT2ExOZBWJ7XMhmuhfoptCNZqw=; b=UkECjARPSAcOaElQmNViUHMQrXEy0VjZJpoLhnegnkJdUmtkQFYSOMo8VIrYaSt2df B5QAcV9etMlZgQpc52uzqYsZU9evQtohDCWKyzNGZVqpomIZ/r6+HX8A8bzkhHX7PgYC CoM17vDjUr2fiRyC/87pGeELq/KnhUaNDzB00GJrjnZshCHT+xGohSZYJcgr3KYm7oDQ hQdMROYUj0iyCJis4xvCmeII19SZiYBOjDCjfIGznLloUjbOD4bTWLprjufdgH7+8Y5A 72G8j8pDdYAh5bfhjmf00eKwIQo/uHFkxpbe7V+qxl6LRCfpsmbyIIbBuzKTUA5oDXy8 gMTw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVy1kRTTLqzBPux7sLykArNybYafsUA1TBpnQy1m7OPGtXM1KBQic17+zkRfjbWmbusPcm8g61u4jQR7nRYQxXKreY/xJE= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxYvliVN9288IUVWPaDD03HeoTmi9Tz3y4Gp4pgo5A+f+cnkQQI 9HCSmIivyHLt3FeHexp+WjitrjJUD2KPSyBMq9xk0UcxeoCPCS/56GyXcWTz/0irtNOGvhSealG IhlNdH0MjYQ2UzPeDa/NSo55PZFXOz0ojtqgxnwwQB4790Kc6Jafx X-Received: by 2002:a2e:be22:0:b0:2ef:1c0a:9b94 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f12edfddc0mr34329351fa.16.1722180238923; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEU13tBt+N37F7ob3Jx0ruuvo8+dsNp9muZtzaqjHOl31gS3qTrnO0jECcjoxvWesNrjNQyHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:be22:0:b0:2ef:1c0a:9b94 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f12edfddc0mr34329181fa.16.1722180238084; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2a0d:6fc7:55d:98c4:742e:26be:b52d:dd54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-428054b9196sm147521925e9.0.2024.07.28.08.23.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:23:49 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: David Woodhouse Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Richard Cochran , Peter Hilber , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, "Ridoux, Julien" , virtio-dev@lists.linux.dev, "Luu, Ryan" , "Chashper, David" , "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" , "Christopher S . Hall" , Jason Wang , John Stultz , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Thomas Gleixner , Xuan Zhuo , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Daniel Lezcano , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , qemu-devel , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: Add vDSO-style vmclock support Message-ID: <20240728111746-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20240725081502-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20240725082828-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20240725083215-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <98813a70f6d3377d3a9d502fd175be97334fcc87.camel@infradead.org> <20240726174958.00007d10@Huawei.com> <811E8A25-3DBC-452D-B594-F9B7B0B61335@infradead.org> <20240728062521-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <9817300C-9280-4CC3-B9DB-37D24C8C20B5@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9817300C-9280-4CC3-B9DB-37D24C8C20B5@infradead.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.125, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 02:07:01PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On 28 July 2024 11:37:04 BST, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > >Glad you asked :) > > Heh, I'm not sure I'm so glad. Did I mention I hate ACPI? Perhaps it's still not too late for me just to define a DT binding and use PRP0001 for it :) > > >Long story short, QEMUVGID is indeed out of spec, but it works > >both because of guest compatibility with ACPI 1.0, and because no one > >much uses it. > > > I think it's reasonable enough to follow that example and use AMZNVCLK (or QEMUVCLK, but there seems little point in both) then? I'd stick to spec. If you like puns, QEMUC10C maybe?