From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910175809.2135596-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910175809.2135596-1-david@redhat.com>
Nowadays, we only have a single machine type in QEMU, everything is based
on virtio-ccw and the traditional virtio machine does no longer exist. No
need to dynamically register diag500 handlers. Move the two existing
handlers into s390-virtio-hcall.c.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 58 --------------------------------
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h | 2 --
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index e30cf0a2a1..57c95786f6 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -16,11 +16,8 @@
#include "exec/ram_addr.h"
#include "exec/confidential-guest-support.h"
#include "hw/boards.h"
-#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
#include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
#include "hw/s390x/s390_flic.h"
-#include "hw/s390x/ioinst.h"
-#include "hw/s390x/css.h"
#include "virtio-ccw.h"
#include "qemu/config-file.h"
#include "qemu/ctype.h"
@@ -124,58 +121,6 @@ static void subsystem_reset(void)
}
}
-static int virtio_ccw_hcall_notify(const uint64_t *args)
-{
- uint64_t subch_id = args[0];
- uint64_t data = args[1];
- SubchDev *sch;
- VirtIODevice *vdev;
- int cssid, ssid, schid, m;
- uint16_t vq_idx = data;
-
- if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(subch_id, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- sch = css_find_subch(m, cssid, ssid, schid);
- if (!sch || !css_subch_visible(sch)) {
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- vdev = virtio_ccw_get_vdev(sch);
- if (vq_idx >= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX || !virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, vq_idx)) {
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA)) {
- virtio_queue_set_shadow_avail_idx(virtio_get_queue(vdev, vq_idx),
- (data >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
- }
-
- virtio_queue_notify(vdev, vq_idx);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int virtio_ccw_hcall_early_printk(const uint64_t *args)
-{
- uint64_t mem = args[0];
- MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
-
- if (mem < ms->ram_size) {
- /* Early printk */
- return 0;
- }
- return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static void virtio_ccw_register_hcalls(void)
-{
- s390_register_virtio_hypercall(KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY,
- virtio_ccw_hcall_notify);
- /* Tolerate early printk. */
- s390_register_virtio_hypercall(KVM_S390_VIRTIO_NOTIFY,
- virtio_ccw_hcall_early_printk);
-}
-
static void s390_memory_init(MemoryRegion *ram)
{
MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
@@ -302,9 +247,6 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
OBJECT(dev));
sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);
- /* register hypercalls */
- virtio_ccw_register_hcalls();
-
s390_enable_css_support(s390_cpu_addr2state(0));
ret = css_create_css_image(VIRTUAL_CSSID, true);
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
index ec7cf8beb3..ca49e3cd22 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.c
@@ -11,31 +11,64 @@
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
#include "cpu.h"
+#include "hw/boards.h"
#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/ioinst.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/css.h"
+#include "virtio-ccw.h"
-#define MAX_DIAG_SUBCODES 255
+static int handle_virtio_notify(uint64_t mem)
+{
+ MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
-static s390_virtio_fn s390_diag500_table[MAX_DIAG_SUBCODES];
+ if (mem < ms->ram_size) {
+ /* Early printk */
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
-void s390_register_virtio_hypercall(uint64_t code, s390_virtio_fn fn)
+static int handle_virtio_ccw_notify(uint64_t subch_id, uint64_t data)
{
- assert(code < MAX_DIAG_SUBCODES);
- assert(!s390_diag500_table[code]);
+ SubchDev *sch;
+ VirtIODevice *vdev;
+ int cssid, ssid, schid, m;
+ uint16_t vq_idx = data;
+
+ if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(subch_id, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ sch = css_find_subch(m, cssid, ssid, schid);
+ if (!sch || !css_subch_visible(sch)) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- s390_diag500_table[code] = fn;
+ vdev = virtio_ccw_get_vdev(sch);
+ if (vq_idx >= VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX || !virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, vq_idx)) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA)) {
+ virtio_queue_set_shadow_avail_idx(virtio_get_queue(vdev, vq_idx),
+ (data >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
+ }
+
+ virtio_queue_notify(vdev, vq_idx);
+ return 0;
}
int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUS390XState *env)
{
- s390_virtio_fn fn;
-
- if (env->regs[1] < MAX_DIAG_SUBCODES) {
- fn = s390_diag500_table[env->regs[1]];
- if (fn) {
- env->regs[2] = fn(&env->regs[2]);
- return 0;
- }
- }
+ const uint64_t subcode = env->regs[1];
- return -EINVAL;
+ switch (subcode) {
+ case KVM_S390_VIRTIO_NOTIFY:
+ env->regs[2] = handle_virtio_notify(env->regs[2]);
+ return 0;
+ case KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY:
+ env->regs[2] = handle_virtio_ccw_notify(env->regs[2], env->regs[3]);
+ return 0;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
index 3ae6d6ae3a..3d9fe147d2 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h
@@ -18,8 +18,6 @@
/* The only thing that we need from the old kvm_virtio.h file */
#define KVM_S390_VIRTIO_NOTIFY 0
-typedef int (*s390_virtio_fn)(const uint64_t *args);
-void s390_register_virtio_hypercall(uint64_t code, s390_virtio_fn fn);
int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUS390XState *env);
#endif /* HW_S390_VIRTIO_HCALL_H */
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 17:57 [PATCH v1 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: don't crash on weird RAM sizes David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:28 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-11 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 12:46 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-11 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:58 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 20:28 ` Eric Farman
2024-09-23 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-23 15:36 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-23 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:57 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-09-11 16:02 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 17:04 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 13:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-17 10:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 10:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 11:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 12:59 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] s390x: rename s390-virtio-hcall* to s390-hypercall* David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 17:05 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: move setting the maximum guest size from sclp to machine code David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:07 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit() David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:10 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-16 13:20 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-17 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 12:48 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-23 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] s390x/s390-hypercall: introduce DIAG500 STORAGE_LIMIT David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:19 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 10:54 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-27 18:05 ` Halil Pasic
2024-09-27 18:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 12:57 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 9:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-10-01 13:31 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 14:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm: prepare memory devices and sparse memory layouts David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] s390x/s390-skeys: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] s390x/pv: check initial, not maximum RAM size David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24 16:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-24 20:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-26 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 11:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-30 13:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 13:26 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_max_pagesize() David Hildenbrand
2024-09-26 10:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] s390x/virtio-ccw: add support for virtio based memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-10 18:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:49 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-11 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 14:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-11 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2024-09-11 19:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-27 18:20 ` Halil Pasic
2024-09-27 18:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 21:49 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-02 9:04 ` Janosch Frank
2024-10-07 12:23 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240910175809.2135596-3-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).