From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/14] s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm: prepare memory devices and sparse memory layouts
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910175809.2135596-9-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910175809.2135596-1-david@redhat.com>
With memory devices, we will have storage attributes for memory that
exceeds the initial ram size. Further, we can easily have memory holes,
for which there (currently) are no storage attributes.
In particular, with memory holes, KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS will fail to set
some storage attributes.
So let's do it like we handle storage keys migration, relying on
guest_phys_blocks_append(). However, in contrast to storage key
migration, we will handle it on the migration destination.
This is a preparation for virtio-mem support. Note that ever since the
"early migration" feature was added (x-early-migration), the state
of device blocks (plugged/unplugged) is migrated early such that
guest_phys_blocks_append() will properly consider all currently plugged
memory blocks and skip any unplugged ones.
In the future, we should try getting rid of the large temporary buffer
and also not send any attributes for any memory holes, just so they
get ignored on the destination.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c b/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c
index eeaa811098..1f1bd507b5 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include "hw/s390x/storage-attributes.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/memory_mapping.h"
#include "exec/ram_addr.h"
#include "kvm/kvm_s390x.h"
#include "qapi/error.h"
@@ -84,8 +85,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_stattrib_set_stattr(S390StAttribState *sa,
uint8_t *values)
{
KVMS390StAttribState *sas = KVM_S390_STATTRIB(sa);
- MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
- unsigned long max = machine->ram_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ unsigned long max = s390_get_memory_limit() / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
if (start_gfn + count > max) {
error_report("Out of memory bounds when setting storage attributes");
@@ -103,39 +103,56 @@ static int kvm_s390_stattrib_set_stattr(S390StAttribState *sa,
static void kvm_s390_stattrib_synchronize(S390StAttribState *sa)
{
KVMS390StAttribState *sas = KVM_S390_STATTRIB(sa);
- MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
- unsigned long max = machine->ram_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
- /* We do not need to reach the maximum buffer size allowed */
- unsigned long cx, len = KVM_S390_SKEYS_MAX / 2;
+ unsigned long max = s390_get_memory_limit() / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ unsigned long start_gfn, end_gfn, pages;
+ GuestPhysBlockList guest_phys_blocks;
+ GuestPhysBlock *block;
int r;
struct kvm_s390_cmma_log clog = {
.flags = 0,
.mask = ~0ULL,
};
- if (sas->incoming_buffer) {
- for (cx = 0; cx + len <= max; cx += len) {
- clog.start_gfn = cx;
- clog.count = len;
- clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + cx);
- r = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS, &clog);
- if (r) {
- error_report("KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS failed: %s", strerror(-r));
- return;
- }
- }
- if (cx < max) {
- clog.start_gfn = cx;
- clog.count = max - cx;
- clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + cx);
+ if (!sas->incoming_buffer) {
+ return;
+ }
+ guest_phys_blocks_init(&guest_phys_blocks);
+ guest_phys_blocks_append(&guest_phys_blocks);
+
+ QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &guest_phys_blocks.head, next) {
+ assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(block->target_start, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE));
+ assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(block->target_end, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE));
+
+ start_gfn = block->target_start / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ end_gfn = block->target_end / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ while (start_gfn < end_gfn) {
+ /* Don't exceed the maximum buffer size. */
+ pages = MIN(end_gfn - start_gfn, KVM_S390_SKEYS_MAX / 2);
+
+ /*
+ * If we ever get guest physical memory beyond the configured
+ * memory limit, something went very wrong.
+ */
+ assert(start_gfn + pages <= max);
+
+ clog.start_gfn = start_gfn;
+ clog.count = pages;
+ clog.values = (uint64_t)(sas->incoming_buffer + start_gfn);
r = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS, &clog);
if (r) {
error_report("KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS failed: %s", strerror(-r));
+ goto out;
}
+
+ start_gfn += pages;
}
- g_free(sas->incoming_buffer);
- sas->incoming_buffer = NULL;
}
+
+out:
+ guest_phys_blocks_free(&guest_phys_blocks);
+ g_free(sas->incoming_buffer);
+ sas->incoming_buffer = NULL;
}
static int kvm_s390_stattrib_set_migrationmode(S390StAttribState *sa, bool val,
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 17:57 [PATCH v1 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: don't crash on weird RAM sizes David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:28 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-11 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 12:46 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-11 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:58 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 20:28 ` Eric Farman
2024-09-23 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-23 15:36 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-23 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 16:02 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 17:04 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 13:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-17 10:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 10:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 11:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 12:59 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] s390x: rename s390-virtio-hcall* to s390-hypercall* David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 17:05 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: move setting the maximum guest size from sclp to machine code David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:07 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit() David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:10 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-16 13:20 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-17 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 12:48 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-23 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] s390x/s390-hypercall: introduce DIAG500 STORAGE_LIMIT David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:19 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 10:54 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-27 18:05 ` Halil Pasic
2024-09-27 18:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 12:57 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 9:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-10-01 13:31 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 14:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] s390x/s390-skeys: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] s390x/pv: check initial, not maximum RAM size David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24 16:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-24 20:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-26 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 11:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-30 13:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 13:26 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_max_pagesize() David Hildenbrand
2024-09-26 10:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] s390x/virtio-ccw: add support for virtio based memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-10 18:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:49 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-11 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 14:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-11 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2024-09-11 19:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-27 18:20 ` Halil Pasic
2024-09-27 18:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 21:49 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-02 9:04 ` Janosch Frank
2024-10-07 12:23 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240910175809.2135596-9-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).