From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu1@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] acpi/ghes: simplify acpi_ghes_record_errors() code
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:09:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240925150933.0000373d@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45dcc7644e2b2a04645a37e561ed7294482b0744.1727236561.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 06:04:07 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> Reduce the ident of the function and prepares it for
> the next changes.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Some of the alignment doesn't seem to match local style which
is either align after ( or align 4 spaces in from line above for
multiple line argument lists.
Code is fine as I guess the later structure is to prepare
for additions that prevent early returns being sensible.
With that in mind.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/acpi/ghes.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes.c b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> index dc217694deb9..dacbd4d0c093 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes.c
> @@ -402,40 +402,42 @@ int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint8_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address)
>
> start_addr = le64_to_cpu(ags->ghes_addr_le);
>
> - if (physical_address) {
> + if (!physical_address) {
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> - if (source_id < ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT) {
> - start_addr += source_id * sizeof(uint64_t);
> - }
> + if (source_id < ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT) {
> + start_addr += source_id * sizeof(uint64_t);
> + }
>
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(start_addr, &error_block_addr,
> - sizeof(error_block_addr));
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(start_addr, &error_block_addr,
> + sizeof(error_block_addr));
>
> - error_block_addr = le64_to_cpu(error_block_addr);
> + error_block_addr = le64_to_cpu(error_block_addr);
>
> - read_ack_register_addr = start_addr +
> - ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT * sizeof(uint64_t);
> + read_ack_register_addr = start_addr +
> + ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT * sizeof(uint64_t);
>
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(read_ack_register_addr,
> - &read_ack_register, sizeof(read_ack_register));
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(read_ack_register_addr,
> + &read_ack_register, sizeof(read_ack_register));
Alignment looks fishy plus maybe move &read_ack_register up a line.
>
> - /* zero means OSPM does not acknowledge the error */
> - if (!read_ack_register) {
> - error_report("OSPM does not acknowledge previous error,"
> - " so can not record CPER for current error anymore");
> - } else if (error_block_addr) {
> - read_ack_register = cpu_to_le64(0);
> - /*
> - * Clear the Read Ack Register, OSPM will write it to 1 when
> - * it acknowledges this error.
> - */
> - cpu_physical_memory_write(read_ack_register_addr,
> - &read_ack_register, sizeof(uint64_t));
> + /* zero means OSPM does not acknowledge the error */
> + if (!read_ack_register) {
> + error_report("OSPM does not acknowledge previous error,"
> + " so can not record CPER for current error anymore");
I guess later changes make it unwise to just return -1 here.
> + } else if (error_block_addr) {
> + read_ack_register = cpu_to_le64(0);
> + /*
> + * Clear the Read Ack Register, OSPM will write it to 1 when
> + * it acknowledges this error.
> + */
> + cpu_physical_memory_write(read_ack_register_addr,
> + &read_ack_register, sizeof(uint64_t));
>
> - ret = acpi_ghes_record_mem_error(error_block_addr,
> - physical_address);
> - } else
> - error_report("can not find Generic Error Status Block");
> + ret = acpi_ghes_record_mem_error(error_block_addr,
> + physical_address);
or return here.
> + } else {
> + error_report("can not find Generic Error Status Block");
> }
>
> return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-25 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-25 4:04 [PATCH 00/15] Prepare GHES driver to support error injection Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 01/15] acpi/ghes: get rid of ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_RESERVED Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:02 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 02/15] acpi/ghes: simplify acpi_ghes_record_errors() code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 03/15] acpi/ghes: simplify the per-arch caller to build HEST table Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:11 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 04/15] acpi/ghes: better handle source_id and notification Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:13 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 05/15] acpi/ghes: Fix acpi_ghes_record_errors() argument Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:15 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 06/15] acpi/ghes: Remove a duplicated out of bounds check Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:15 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 07/15] acpi/ghes: Change the type for source_id Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:16 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 08/15] acpi/ghes: Prepare to support multiple sources on ghes Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 14:23 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-01 5:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 09/15] acpi/ghes: make the GHES record generation more generic Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:00 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-26 14:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 10/15] acpi/ghes: move offset calculus to a separate function Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:03 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-01 5:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 11/15] acpi/ghes: better name GHES memory error function Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:07 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 12/15] acpi/ghes: don't crash QEMU if ghes GED is not found Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-26 14:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 13/15] acpi/ghes: rename etc/hardware_error file macros Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:11 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 14/15] better name the offset of the hardware error firmware Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:12 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-01 6:02 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-25 4:04 ` [PATCH 15/15] docs: acpi_hest_ghes: fix documentation for CPER size Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-09-26 12:13 ` Jonathan Cameron via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240925150933.0000373d@Huawei.com \
--to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
--cc=gengdongjiu1@gmail.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).