From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AB9C369CD for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stnDz-0006Tq-C1; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:03:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stnDx-0006SH-2K; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:03:57 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stnDv-0000to-JO; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:03:56 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XDsZk3rZqz6K9kS; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:59:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDE11401F3; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:03:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:03:49 +0200 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:03:48 +0100 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: Igor Mammedov , Shiju Jose , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ani Sinha , Dongjiu Geng , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] acpi/ghes: move offset calculus to a separate function Message-ID: <20240926130348.00005e45@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5e8c2f0267a21d05ed09c8af616a92d94638c474.1727236561.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> References: <5e8c2f0267a21d05ed09c8af616a92d94638c474.1727236561.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500004.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.9) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jonathan Cameron From: Jonathan Cameron via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 06:04:15 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Currently, CPER address location is calculated as an offset of > the hardware_errors table. It is also badly named, as the > offset actually used is the address where the CPER data starts, > and not the beginning of the error source. > > Move the logic which calculates such offset to a separate > function, in preparation for a patch that will be changing the > logic to calculate it from the HEST table. > > While here, properly name the variable which stores the cper > address. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Trivial comment inline. Given this is a placeholder for more radical refactor I'll not comment on the maths etc being less flexible than it will hopefully end up! Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > void ghes_record_cper_errors(const void *cper, size_t len, > uint16_t source_id, Error **errp) > { > - /* > - * As the current version supports only one source, the ack offset is > - * just sizeof(uint64_t). > - */ > - read_ack_register_addr = start_addr + sizeof(uint64_t); > - > cpu_physical_memory_read(read_ack_register_addr, > - &read_ack_register, sizeof(read_ack_register)); > + &read_ack_register, sizeof(read_ack_register)); > Wrong patch for this alignment tidy up? Or are my eyes deceiving me and there is more going on here... J