From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1FD3CDD1CD for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1suFZw-0000Ch-Sk; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:20:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1suFZv-0000Bo-7n; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:20:31 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1suFZt-00081U-1P; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:20:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 48RFYX2G027543; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh= kneeF3mFDM/Go1LB2E6ZE+zSIif4ejvnU2NXtvvZG2w=; b=Yvxqgw4AykzzCNzF XTAVfWDVqWBnTbhAJ0A9o3SuNnXunEOahNgfm51uFk0/w4RnKL/jn8/AbLl50xy/ TE6xi2F7dcYeJzaLVvBIOZdRjE9DcRbD9Q1GxqpsjMC7Ow41P0yuUSktaQzIsfE/ cwpD8DpFKhVhXT6vk7D/M2uUkB48wWQNK/k8EYgmNgyp6paazkV/v3UQiUzhdBPu 7xNo85bZSbEQWc0Biz36ILryjC1KAZHPb1OD12CMUCTLJhp0RBSGS63BzBjErBpH CzMz0HVpKHfHFMNr7Asf6jeVzQgdeAWnjgL6EttD7U2qwHm3QCKp4jj9sx3OVRAy oiJEzQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41snt1w86d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360072.ppops.net (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 48RIKQC2026236; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:26 GMT Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41snt1w869-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 48RH1Auk005841; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:25 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 41tapmx9xr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:25 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 48RIKLc854067582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:21 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F69620040; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA582004B; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-ce58cfcc-320b-11b2-a85c-85e19b5285e0 (unknown [9.171.33.236]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:20:20 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:20:19 +0200 From: Halil Pasic To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Cornelia Huck , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Janosch Frank , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , Christian Borntraeger , Eric Farman , Richard Henderson , Ilya Leoshkevich , Heiko Carstens , Halil Pasic Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support Message-ID: <20240927202019.6d721171.pasic@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240910175809.2135596-1-david@redhat.com> <4429b29a-a022-4507-a358-1a16b5032395@linux.ibm.com> <9dc58bde-7979-4ffb-9ba7-a501d9fcc416@redhat.com> <20240911100415-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <871q1qurol.fsf@redhat.com> Organization: IBM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: OpZ9Hd_zZZT1f-GKv4rITTmILB4Ff2uA X-Proofpoint-GUID: cZ2OwnC3TFcEGxSEr1HM0ZhuVWVG4Z5L X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-27_06,2024-09-27_01,2024-09-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=578 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2408220000 definitions=main-2409270132 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=pasic@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Anyway, if we want to proceed with the gitlab project, would it make > > sense to create an org for it, so that it doesn't look like David's > > personal project? Frankly, I would prefer making Documentation/virt/kvm/s390/s390-diag.rst the authoritative documentation on DIAGs. My train of thought is DIAG 500 is a KVM thing, and KVM is a linux kernel thing, so it just feels right for the documentatio to live within the linux source tree. I may have missed some of the discussion: what were the benefits of having this in its separate project/repository? Regards, Halil