From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A19BECF6495 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sv2NQ-00047z-0e; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:26:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sv2NO-00047Q-Ci for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:26:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sv2NM-0005R0-Tx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:26:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1727648806; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PemBl1hyIBKlSfrjKFuPjoBlVFbCeAta7QU5X0y5gt4=; b=Db1DCd81N1lDP3Q7EHg3sHZ7ztWDZwJfq4Xks9BQLPZ1SZkuBbwQJXGx9VlyhIeTVds0eS Dse6EJd+8KHFOydniHyEvT1FYJdiJS7m9hGksvDLtRFRFSWjNH0DHFq84QfKROT1fzwazq uy866W2X1ZmHueI9jx997Ka3Xetx290= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-530-Y1yjCGECOpmTR8MG1gFPWA-1; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:26:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Y1yjCGECOpmTR8MG1gFPWA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5c884ed9844so1978594a12.1 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 15:26:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727648804; x=1728253604; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PemBl1hyIBKlSfrjKFuPjoBlVFbCeAta7QU5X0y5gt4=; b=DS22QIq73RZP3ggrYqtQY+Gwd3AAG0WnWTtsKyq0akOsWBH+gKhOCbvoxf/Y3CVJrM w1pMDLLdg88B8LPnBV/4iAb1ndxfCtPeYwvvVmpbOkN+UD1SOuvUTgBScZrs2MBF3tnb bZLRb7pP7PR0p5r3i2Lu6874AVz+mpMnUKa1oST/K/fTjaA8Y/4RT2wZHw2C4IKQ9nQA X60RWUEBVsk+58LJdxP4HwvgCDxUt7ARXf9eHEwUyHL3sGBPwizkb3tCq5TqPxoPGCYs sRb0+rBTeixYq/tP+tEFY6ECXsjxAgGqjbTHzyoHH0IkKWvkOS0EaTNPR4w3w5hGXc9n ceyg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWlzM19Y5acdq4UeJ7SBeH5cwV6sfnUcNaS63sM6gqyciDDPsNgUTdmSmEQoMQA2+1pTkTCfjNAUZFa@nongnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwABRGZiMrqY5ilATXlROFmJXo4Y0t9p2biGCgQv2kYkaFYJj1b OWNQX0beY3PtXhg9R4DS4V4nx0yT45ySDqaS302lXWwQTdb2G3AY7CDAIzOzzQHxMlAr7p4A29G XPc2SvwtXtjDUPNVzwnUlABkGgmp1YNsrEwucpe/T25CRj/yatfvD X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e1c:b0:a88:b93b:cdcb with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a93c4a68305mr937015566b.47.1727648804137; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 15:26:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGPK76RJL7fWhJqBZ4WIV0xqWHm/oTyDpoUm61pptCrw05Cci/N1M+eFd2v4vtuGKr3jSxwsw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e1c:b0:a88:b93b:cdcb with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a93c4a68305mr937013966b.47.1727648803738; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2a02:14f:17b:822e:847c:4023:a734:1389]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a93c27c7130sm431617466b.67.2024.09.29.15.26.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Sep 2024 15:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:26:37 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Michael Galaxy Cc: Sean Hefty , Peter Xu , "Gonglei (Arei)" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "yu.zhang@ionos.com" , "elmar.gerdes@ionos.com" , zhengchuan , "berrange@redhat.com" , "armbru@redhat.com" , "lizhijian@fujitsu.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , Xiexiangyou , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "lixiao (H)" , "jinpu.wang@ionos.com" , Wangjialin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] refactor RDMA live migration based on rsocket API Message-ID: <20240929182538-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1717503252-51884-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <20240827165643-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <027c4f24-f515-4fdb-8770-6bf2433e0f43@akamai.com> <84c74f1a95a648b18c9d41b8c5ef2f60@huawei.com> <0730fa9b-49cd-46e4-9264-afabe2486154@akamai.com> <20240929141323-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <46f8e54e-64a4-4d90-9b02-4fd699b54e41@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46f8e54e-64a4-4d90-9b02-4fd699b54e41@akamai.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.095, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 03:26:58PM -0500, Michael Galaxy wrote: > > On 9/29/24 13:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > !-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > This Message Is From an External Sender > > This message came from outside your organization. > > |-------------------------------------------------------------------! > > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:52:08PM -0500, Michael Galaxy wrote: > > > A bounce buffer defeats the entire purpose of using RDMA in these cases. > > > When using RDMA for very large transfers like this, the goal here is to map > > > the entire memory region at once and avoid all CPU interactions (except for > > > message management within libibverbs) so that the NIC is doing all of the > > > work. > > > > > > I'm sure rsocket has its place with much smaller transfer sizes, but this is > > > very different. > > To clarify, are you actively using rdma based migration in production? Stepping up > > to help maintain it? > > > Yes, both Huawei and IONOS have both been contributing here in this email > thread. > > They are both using it in production. > > - Michael Well, any plans to work on it? for example, postcopy does not really do zero copy last time I checked, there's also a long TODO list. -- MST