From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>, Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support for machine
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 18:44:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012104429.1048908-4-zhao1.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012104429.1048908-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Add cache_supported flags in SMPCompatProps to allow machines to
configure various caches support.
And check the compatibility of the cache properties with the
machine support in machine_parse_smp_cache().
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
Changes since Patch v2:
* Polished the comment of "default" level check. (Jonathan)
* Reduced short line wrap. (Jonathan)
Changes since Patch v1:
* Dropped machine_check_smp_cache_support() and did the check when
-machine parses smp-cache in machine_parse_smp_cache().
Changes since RFC v2:
* Split as a separate commit to just include compatibility checking and
topology checking.
* Allow setting "default" topology level even though the cache
isn't supported by machine. (Daniel)
---
hw/core/machine-smp.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/boards.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/core/machine-smp.c b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
index 1ce7be902e6e..f3edbded2e7b 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine-smp.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
@@ -261,10 +261,47 @@ void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms,
}
}
+static bool machine_check_topo_support(MachineState *ms,
+ CpuTopologyLevel topo,
+ Error **errp)
+{
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
+
+ if ((topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_MODULE && !mc->smp_props.modules_supported) ||
+ (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_CLUSTER && !mc->smp_props.clusters_supported) ||
+ (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DIE && !mc->smp_props.dies_supported) ||
+ (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_BOOK && !mc->smp_props.books_supported) ||
+ (topo == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DRAWER && !mc->smp_props.drawers_supported)) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "Invalid topology level: %s. "
+ "The topology level is not supported by this machine",
+ CpuTopologyLevel_str(topo));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * When both cache1 and cache2 are configured with specific topology levels
+ * (not default level), is cache1's topology level higher than cache2?
+ */
+static bool smp_cache_topo_cmp(const SmpCache *smp_cache,
+ CacheLevelAndType cache1,
+ CacheLevelAndType cache2)
+{
+ if (smp_cache->props[cache1].topology != CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DEFAULT &&
+ smp_cache->props[cache1].topology > smp_cache->props[cache2].topology) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
bool machine_parse_smp_cache(MachineState *ms,
const SmpCachePropertiesList *caches,
Error **errp)
{
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
const SmpCachePropertiesList *node;
DECLARE_BITMAP(caches_bitmap, CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX);
@@ -292,6 +329,44 @@ bool machine_parse_smp_cache(MachineState *ms,
set_bit(node->value->cache, caches_bitmap);
}
+ for (int i = 0; i < CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX; i++) {
+ const SmpCacheProperties *props = &ms->smp_cache.props[i];
+
+ /*
+ * Reject non "default" topology level if the cache isn't
+ * supported by the machine.
+ */
+ if (props->topology != CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DEFAULT &&
+ !mc->smp_props.cache_supported[props->cache]) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "%s cache topology not supported by this machine",
+ CacheLevelAndType_str(node->value->cache));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (!machine_check_topo_support(ms, props->topology, errp)) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (smp_cache_topo_cmp(&ms->smp_cache, CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE_L1D,
+ CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE_L2) ||
+ smp_cache_topo_cmp(&ms->smp_cache, CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE_L1I,
+ CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE_L2)) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "Invalid smp cache topology. "
+ "L2 cache topology level shouldn't be lower than L1 cache");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (smp_cache_topo_cmp(&ms->smp_cache, CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE_L2,
+ CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE_L3)) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "Invalid smp cache topology. "
+ "L3 cache topology level shouldn't be lower than L2 cache");
+ return false;
+ }
+
return true;
}
diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
index 0729066e353a..e4a1035e3fa1 100644
--- a/include/hw/boards.h
+++ b/include/hw/boards.h
@@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ typedef struct {
* @books_supported - whether books are supported by the machine
* @drawers_supported - whether drawers are supported by the machine
* @modules_supported - whether modules are supported by the machine
+ * @cache_supported - whether cache (l1d, l1i, l2 and l3) configuration are
+ * supported by the machine
*/
typedef struct {
bool prefer_sockets;
@@ -160,6 +162,7 @@ typedef struct {
bool books_supported;
bool drawers_supported;
bool modules_supported;
+ bool cache_supported[CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX];
} SMPCompatProps;
/**
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 10:44 [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
[not found] ` <20241017095227.00006d85@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 13:20 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-17 14:51 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 2:36 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-18 7:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 9:01 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 16:19 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-10-18 4:26 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 3:57 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-18 7:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 9:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 13:16 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-17 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Jonathan Cameron via
[not found] ` <20241017141402.0000135b@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 15:01 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241012104429.1048908-4-zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).