From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:51:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022135151.2052198-2-zhao1.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022135151.2052198-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
In the follow-up change, the CPU topology enumeration will be moved to
QAPI. And considerring "invalid" should not be exposed to QAPI as an
unsettable item, so, as a preparation for future changes, remove
"invalid" level from the current CPU topology enumeration structure
and define it by a macro instead.
Due to the removal of the enumeration of "invalid", bit 0 of
CPUX86State.avail_cpu_topo bitmap will no longer correspond to "invalid"
level, but will start at the SMT level. Therefore, to honor this change,
update the encoding rule for CPUID[0x1F].
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
---
Tested by the following cases to ensure 0x1f's behavior hasn't
changed:
-smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=3,modules=2,cores=2,threads=1
-smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=1,modules=3,cores=2,threads=2
-smp cpus=24,sockets=2,modules=3,cores=2,threads=2
-smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=3,modules=1,cores=2,threads=2
-smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=3,cores=2,threads=2
---
Changes since Patch v3:
* Now commit to stop exposing "invalid" enumeration in QAPI. (Daniel)
---
include/hw/i386/topology.h | 3 ++-
target/i386/cpu.c | 13 ++++++++-----
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/i386/topology.h b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
index dff49fce1154..48b43edc5a90 100644
--- a/include/hw/i386/topology.h
+++ b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
unsigned threads_per_core;
} X86CPUTopoInfo;
+#define CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX
+
/*
* CPUTopoLevel is the general i386 topology hierarchical representation,
* ordered by increasing hierarchical relationship.
@@ -69,7 +71,6 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
* or AMD (CPUID[0x80000026]).
*/
enum CPUTopoLevel {
- CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID,
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT,
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE,
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MODULE,
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 1ff1af032eaa..638de9c29c4c 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -367,20 +367,21 @@ static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count,
uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx)
{
X86CPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
- unsigned long level, next_level;
+ unsigned long level, base_level, next_level;
uint32_t num_threads_next_level, offset_next_level;
- assert(count + 1 < CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX);
+ assert(count <= CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE);
/*
* Find the No.(count + 1) topology level in avail_cpu_topo bitmap.
- * The search starts from bit 1 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID + 1).
+ * The search starts from bit 0 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT).
*/
- level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID;
+ level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT;
+ base_level = level;
for (int i = 0; i <= count; i++) {
level = find_next_bit(env->avail_cpu_topo,
CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE,
- level + 1);
+ base_level);
/*
* CPUID[0x1f] doesn't explicitly encode the package level,
@@ -391,6 +392,8 @@ static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count,
level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID;
break;
}
+ /* Search the next level. */
+ base_level = level + 1;
}
if (level == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 13:51 [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-22 14:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2024-10-29 20:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-11-01 2:38 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 7:47 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 14:44 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-28 9:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241022135151.2052198-2-zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).