qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
	"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:51:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022135151.2052198-2-zhao1.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022135151.2052198-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>

In the follow-up change, the CPU topology enumeration will be moved to
QAPI. And considerring "invalid" should not be exposed to QAPI as an
unsettable item, so, as a preparation for future changes, remove
"invalid" level from the current CPU topology enumeration structure
and define it by a macro instead.

Due to the removal of the enumeration of "invalid", bit 0 of
CPUX86State.avail_cpu_topo bitmap will no longer correspond to "invalid"
level, but will start at the SMT level. Therefore, to honor this change,
update the encoding rule for CPUID[0x1F].

Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
---
Tested by the following cases to ensure 0x1f's behavior hasn't
changed:
  -smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=3,modules=2,cores=2,threads=1
  -smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=1,modules=3,cores=2,threads=2
  -smp cpus=24,sockets=2,modules=3,cores=2,threads=2
  -smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=3,modules=1,cores=2,threads=2
  -smp cpus=24,sockets=2,dies=3,cores=2,threads=2
---
Changes since Patch v3:
  * Now commit to stop exposing "invalid" enumeration in QAPI. (Daniel)
---
 include/hw/i386/topology.h |  3 ++-
 target/i386/cpu.c          | 13 ++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/i386/topology.h b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
index dff49fce1154..48b43edc5a90 100644
--- a/include/hw/i386/topology.h
+++ b/include/hw/i386/topology.h
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
     unsigned threads_per_core;
 } X86CPUTopoInfo;
 
+#define CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX
+
 /*
  * CPUTopoLevel is the general i386 topology hierarchical representation,
  * ordered by increasing hierarchical relationship.
@@ -69,7 +71,6 @@ typedef struct X86CPUTopoInfo {
  * or AMD (CPUID[0x80000026]).
  */
 enum CPUTopoLevel {
-    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID,
     CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT,
     CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE,
     CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MODULE,
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 1ff1af032eaa..638de9c29c4c 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -367,20 +367,21 @@ static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count,
                                 uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx)
 {
     X86CPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
-    unsigned long level, next_level;
+    unsigned long level, base_level, next_level;
     uint32_t num_threads_next_level, offset_next_level;
 
-    assert(count + 1 < CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX);
+    assert(count <= CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE);
 
     /*
      * Find the No.(count + 1) topology level in avail_cpu_topo bitmap.
-     * The search starts from bit 1 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID + 1).
+     * The search starts from bit 0 (CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT).
      */
-    level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID;
+    level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT;
+    base_level = level;
     for (int i = 0; i <= count; i++) {
         level = find_next_bit(env->avail_cpu_topo,
                               CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE,
-                              level + 1);
+                              base_level);
 
         /*
          * CPUID[0x1f] doesn't explicitly encode the package level,
@@ -391,6 +392,8 @@ static void encode_topo_cpuid1f(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t count,
             level = CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID;
             break;
         }
+        /* Search the next level. */
+        base_level = level + 1;
     }
 
     if (level == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID) {
-- 
2.34.1



  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-22 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 13:51 [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-22 14:43   ` [PATCH v4 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2024-10-29 20:10   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-11-01  2:38     ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-01  7:47       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 14:44   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-28  9:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241022135151.2052198-2-zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).