qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Michael S.Tsirkin " <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
	"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
	"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:43:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022154352.00001a4e@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022135151.2052198-2-zhao1.liu@intel.com>

Resend. Claws-mail is still chewing up the to list for unknown reasons
and I forgot to fix it by hand.

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:51:43 +0800
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> In the follow-up change, the CPU topology enumeration will be moved to
> QAPI. And considerring "invalid" should not be exposed to QAPI as an
> unsettable item, so, as a preparation for future changes, remove
> "invalid" level from the current CPU topology enumeration structure
> and define it by a macro instead.
> 
> Due to the removal of the enumeration of "invalid", bit 0 of
> CPUX86State.avail_cpu_topo bitmap will no longer correspond to "invalid"
> level, but will start at the SMT level. Therefore, to honor this change,
> update the encoding rule for CPUID[0x1F].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>

The drop of the invalid level == 0 seems reasonable to me
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-22 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 13:51 [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 14:43   ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2024-10-29 20:10   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-11-01  2:38     ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-01  7:47       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 14:44   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-28  9:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241022154352.00001a4e@Huawei.com \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).