From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] hw/intc/openpic: Avoid taking address of out-of-bounds array index
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:02:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105180205.3074071-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> (raw)
The clang sanitizer complains about the code in the EOI handling
of openpic_cpu_write_internal():
UBSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1 ./build/clang/qemu-system-ppc -M mac99,graphics=off -display none -kernel day15/invaders.elf
../../hw/intc/openpic.c:1034:16: runtime error: index -1 out of bounds for type 'IRQSource[264]' (aka 'struct IRQSource[264]')
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior ../../hw/intc/openpic.c:1034:16 in
This is because we do
src = &opp->src[n_IRQ];$
when n_IRQ may be -1. This is in practice harmless because if n_IRQ
is -1 then we don't do anything with the src pointer, but it is
undefined behaviour. (This has been present since this device
was first added to QEMU.)
Rearrange the code so we only do the array index when n_IRQ is not -1.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: e9df014c0b ("Implement embedded IRQ controller for PowerPC 6xx/740 & 75")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
Arguable whether it's worth the stable backport or not...
---
hw/intc/openpic.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/openpic.c b/hw/intc/openpic.c
index cd3d87768e0..2ead4b9ba00 100644
--- a/hw/intc/openpic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/openpic.c
@@ -1031,13 +1031,14 @@ static void openpic_cpu_write_internal(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
s_IRQ = IRQ_get_next(opp, &dst->servicing);
/* Check queued interrupts. */
n_IRQ = IRQ_get_next(opp, &dst->raised);
- src = &opp->src[n_IRQ];
- if (n_IRQ != -1 &&
- (s_IRQ == -1 ||
- IVPR_PRIORITY(src->ivpr) > dst->servicing.priority)) {
- DPRINTF("Raise OpenPIC INT output cpu %d irq %d",
- idx, n_IRQ);
- qemu_irq_raise(opp->dst[idx].irqs[OPENPIC_OUTPUT_INT]);
+ if (n_IRQ != -1) {
+ src = &opp->src[n_IRQ];
+ if (s_IRQ == -1 ||
+ IVPR_PRIORITY(src->ivpr) > dst->servicing.priority) {
+ DPRINTF("Raise OpenPIC INT output cpu %d irq %d",
+ idx, n_IRQ);
+ qemu_irq_raise(opp->dst[idx].irqs[OPENPIC_OUTPUT_INT]);
+ }
}
break;
default:
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 18:02 Peter Maydell [this message]
2024-11-06 9:45 ` [PATCH] hw/intc/openpic: Avoid taking address of out-of-bounds array index Richard Henderson
2024-11-06 11:57 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2024-11-14 13:22 ` Peter Maydell
2024-11-14 14:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241105180205.3074071-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).