From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <mst@redhat.com>,
<jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>, <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
<richard.henderson@linaro.org>, <anisinha@redhat.com>,
<eduardo@habkost.net>, <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
<david@redhat.com>, <philmd@linaro.org>, <peterx@redhat.com>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <gshan@redhat.com>,
<borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <darren@os.amperecomputing.com>,
<ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>, <vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>,
<karl.heubaum@oracle.com>, <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
<salil.mehta@opnsrc.net>, <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
<wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>, <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
<zhao1.liu@intel.com>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
<gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Fix: Reverse CPUs presence check logic for x86 backward compatability
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:56:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241106145635.77332d7c@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106130331.205020-3-salil.mehta@huawei.com>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:03:30 +0000
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com> wrote:
> Checking `is_present` first can break x86 migration from new Qemu
> version to old Qemu. This is because CPRS Bit is not defined in the
> older Qemu register block and will always be 0 resulting in check always
> failing. Reversing the logic to first check `is_enabled` can alleviate
> below problem:
>
> - If ((\_SB.PCI0.PRES.CPEN == One))
> - {
> - Local0 = 0x0F
> + If ((\_SB.PCI0.PRES.CPRS == One))
> + {
> + If ((\_SB.PCI0.PRES.CPEN == One))
> + {
> + Local0 = 0x0F
> + }
> + Else
> + {
> + Local0 = 0x0D
> + }
> }
>
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
'Reported-by' maybe, but certainly not suggested.
After more thinking and given presence is system wide that doesn't change
at runtime, I don't see any reason for introducing presence bit as ABI
(and undocumented on top of that).
Instead changing AML code to account for it would be better,
something like this:
diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/cpu.h b/include/hw/acpi/cpu.h
index 32654dc274..4a3e591120 100644
--- a/include/hw/acpi/cpu.h
+++ b/include/hw/acpi/cpu.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void cpu_hotplug_hw_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
typedef struct CPUHotplugFeatures {
bool acpi_1_compatible;
bool has_legacy_cphp;
+ bool always_present_cpus;
bool fw_unplugs_cpu;
const char *smi_path;
} CPUHotplugFeatures;
diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
index 5cb60ca8bc..2bcce2b31c 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
@@ -452,15 +452,16 @@ void build_cpus_aml(Aml *table, MachineState *machine, CPUHotplugFeatures opts,
method = aml_method(CPU_STS_METHOD, 1, AML_SERIALIZED);
{
+ uint8_t default_sta = opts.always_present_cpus?0xd:0;
Aml *idx = aml_arg(0);
- Aml *sta = aml_local(0);
+ Aml *sta = aml_local(default_sta);
aml_append(method, aml_acquire(ctrl_lock, 0xFFFF));
aml_append(method, aml_store(idx, cpu_selector));
aml_append(method, aml_store(zero, sta));
ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(is_enabled, one));
{
- aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(aml_int(0xF), sta));
+ aml_append(ifctx, aml_or(aml_int(0xF), sta, sta));
}
aml_append(method, ifctx);
aml_append(method, aml_release(ctrl_lock))
then for ARM set
CPUHotplugFeatures::always_present_cpus = true
to get present flag always enabled
After that revert _all_ other presence bit related changes
that were just merged.
(I did ask to get rid of that in previous reviews but it
came back again for no good reason).
> Message-ID: <20241106100047.18901c9d@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/acpi/cpu.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> index 23443f09a5..b2f7a2b27e 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
> @@ -490,22 +490,22 @@ void build_cpus_aml(Aml *table, MachineState *machine, CPUHotplugFeatures opts,
> aml_append(method, aml_acquire(ctrl_lock, 0xFFFF));
> aml_append(method, aml_store(idx, cpu_selector));
> aml_append(method, aml_store(zero, sta));
> - ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(is_present, one));
> + ifctx = aml_if(aml_equal(is_enabled, one));
> {
> - ifctx2 = aml_if(aml_equal(is_enabled, one));
> - {
> - /* cpu is present and enabled */
> - aml_append(ifctx2, aml_store(aml_int(0xF), sta));
> - }
> - aml_append(ifctx, ifctx2);
> - else_ctx = aml_else();
> + /* cpu is present and enabled */
> + aml_append(ifctx, aml_store(aml_int(0xF), sta));
> + }
> + aml_append(method, ifctx);
> + else_ctx = aml_else();
> + {
> + ifctx2 = aml_if(aml_equal(is_present, one));
> {
> /* cpu is present but disabled */
> - aml_append(else_ctx, aml_store(aml_int(0xD), sta));
> + aml_append(ifctx2, aml_store(aml_int(0xD), sta));
> }
> - aml_append(ifctx, else_ctx);
> + aml_append(else_ctx, ifctx2);
> }
> - aml_append(method, ifctx);
> + aml_append(method, else_ctx);
> aml_append(method, aml_release(ctrl_lock));
> aml_append(method, aml_return(sta));
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 13:03 [PATCH 0/3] Fixes CPUs AML & acpi-bios-tables to be x86 backward compatible Salil Mehta via
2024-11-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] qtest: allow ACPI DSDT Table changes Salil Mehta via
2024-11-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] Fix: Reverse CPUs presence check logic for x86 backward compatability Salil Mehta via
2024-11-06 13:56 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2024-11-06 14:45 ` Salil Mehta via
2024-11-06 16:07 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-11-06 19:05 ` Salil Mehta via
2024-11-07 16:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-11-07 18:59 ` Salil Mehta via
2024-11-08 16:49 ` Igor Mammedov
2024-11-06 13:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] tests/qtest/bios-tables-test: Fix DSDT golden masters for x86/{pc, q35} Salil Mehta via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241106145635.77332d7c@imammedo.users.ipa.redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=karl.heubaum@oracle.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=salil.mehta@opnsrc.net \
--cc=vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).