From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC42C02192 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tfj8c-0001Sx-Px; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 12:24:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tfj8Z-0001Qw-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 12:24:32 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tfj8X-0007ZG-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 12:24:31 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Yp6Wr3rCVz6J9St; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 01:23:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBA8140593; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 01:24:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:24:15 +0100 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:24:14 +0000 To: Davidlohr Bueso CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/cxl: Support aborting background commands Message-ID: <20250205172414.00007486@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250205044749.xoo73gewwjahxj6k@offworld> References: <20240813221255.179200-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20240827163357.0000228e@Huawei.com> <20241022180030.00004f68@Huawei.com> <20250203150706.00000e23@huawei.com> <20250205044749.xoo73gewwjahxj6k@offworld> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jonathan Cameron From: Jonathan Cameron via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 20:47:49 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Mon, 03 Feb 2025, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > >On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:00:30 +0100 > >Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:23:46 -0700 > >> Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2024, Jonathan Cameron wrote:\n > >> > >No comments inline and LGTM. I'll queue it on my tree and push > >> > >that out on gitlab sometime soonish. > >> > > >> > I don't see this picked up, which is a good thing atm. While testing > >> > the kernel side, I noticed the following is needed, will send a v2 > >> > with it folded in. > >> > >> Currently just on my cxl-2024-10-15 branch of gitlab.com/jic23/qemu. > >> I'll pick up your v2 and replace that. > > > >Hi Davidlohr, > > > >Did I miss v2, or still to send? > > Ah, thanks for the reminder, I had forgotten to send it out. > > Actually, considering you have been carrying v1 for a while now, > would it not be cleaner/better just rebasing the diff and sending you > that instead of a whole new v2? Otherwise, I'm not sure what to do > when working on your latest 2025-01-24 branch. Pick point where I'm carrying it and post a patch based on the next commit up. Just let me know you've done that and all should be good. Jonathan > > Thanks, > Davidlohr