Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] vhost-user: Add VirtIO Shared Memory map request

[Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1127 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:40:04PM +0100, Albert Esteve wrote:
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 85110bce37..47d0ddb820 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3063,6 +3063,75 @@ int virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f)
>      return vmstate_save_state(f, &vmstate_virtio, vdev, NULL);
>  }
>  
> +VirtSharedMemory *virtio_new_shmem_region(VirtIODevice *vdev)
> +{
> +    ++vdev->n_shmem_regions;
> +    vdev->shmem_list = g_renew(VirtSharedMemory, vdev->shmem_list,
> +                               vdev->n_shmem_regions);
> +    vdev->shmem_list[vdev->n_shmem_regions - 1].mr = g_new0(MemoryRegion, 1);
> +    QTAILQ_INIT(&vdev->shmem_list[vdev->n_shmem_regions - 1].mmaps);
> +    return &vdev->shmem_list[vdev->n_shmem_regions - 1];
> +}

On second thought, it would be easier to change shmem_list's type to
VirtSharedMemory** and g_renew(VirtSharedMemory*, ...). That way the
array approach can be kept without worrying about reallocating the
VirtSharedMemory structs themselves. Only the array of pointers is
reallocated.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]