qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,
	alistair.francis@wdc.com,  liwei1518@gmail.com,
	zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, palmer@rivosinc.com,
	 abologna@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[]
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:15:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423-9623c5901480c9e7be10d9e5@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417124839.1870494-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:48:36AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> At this moment we're not checking if the host has support for any
> specific CSR before doing get/put regs. This will cause problems if the
> host KVM doesn't support it (see [1] as an example).
> 
> We'll use the same approach done with the CPU extensions: read all known
> KVM CSRs during init() to check for availability, then read/write them
> if they are present. This will be made by either using get-reglist or by
> directly reading the CSRs.
> 
> For now we'll just convert the CSRs to use a kvm_csr_cfg[] array,
> reusing the same KVMCPUConfig abstraction we use for extensions, and use
> the array in (get|put)_csr_regs() instead of manually listing them. A
> lot of boilerplate will be added but at least we'll automate the get/put
> procedure for CSRs, i.e. adding a new CSR in the future will be a matter
> of adding it in kvm_csr_regs[] and everything else will be taken care
> of.
> 
> Despite all the code changes no behavioral change is made.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/CABJz62OfUDHYkQ0T3rGHStQprf1c7_E0qBLbLKhfv=+jb0SYAw@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.h         |   1 +
>  target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index 51e49e03de..7a56666f9a 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_name(uint32_t bit);
>  const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_description(uint32_t bit);
>  
>  #define CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop) offsetof(struct RISCVCPUConfig, _prop)
> +#define ENV_CSR_OFFSET(_csr) offsetof(CPURISCVState, _csr)
>  
>  typedef struct riscv_cpu_profile {
>      struct riscv_cpu_profile *u_parent;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index 0bcadab977..99a4f01b15 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -114,22 +114,6 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
>      KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
>                             KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name))
>  
> -#define KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
> -    do { \
> -        int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), &reg); \
> -        if (_ret) { \
> -            return _ret; \
> -        } \
> -    } while (0)
> -
> -#define KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
> -    do { \
> -        int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), &reg); \
> -        if (_ret) { \
> -            return _ret; \
> -        } \
> -    } while (0)
> -
>  #define KVM_RISCV_GET_TIMER(cs, name, reg) \
>      do { \
>          int ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_TIMER_REG(name), &reg); \
> @@ -150,6 +134,7 @@ typedef struct KVMCPUConfig {
>      const char *name;
>      const char *description;
>      target_ulong offset;
> +    uint32_t prop_size;
>      uint64_t kvm_reg_id;
>      bool user_set;
>      bool supported;
> @@ -251,6 +236,54 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_misa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +#define KVM_CSR_CFG(_name, _env_prop, _env_prop_size, reg_id) \
> +    {.name = _name, .offset = ENV_CSR_OFFSET(_env_prop), \
> +     .prop_size = _env_prop_size, .kvm_reg_id = reg_id}
> +
> +static KVMCPUConfig kvm_csr_cfgs[] = {
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("sstatus", mstatus, sizeof(uint64_t), RISCV_CSR_REG(sstatus)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("sie", mie, sizeof(uint64_t), RISCV_CSR_REG(sie)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("stvec", stvec, sizeof(target_ulong), RISCV_CSR_REG(stvec)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("sscratch", sscratch, sizeof(target_ulong),
> +                RISCV_CSR_REG(sscratch)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("sepc", sepc, sizeof(target_ulong), RISCV_CSR_REG(sepc)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("scause", scause, sizeof(target_ulong), RISCV_CSR_REG(scause)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("stval", stval, sizeof(target_ulong), RISCV_CSR_REG(stval)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("sip", mip, sizeof(uint64_t), RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)),
> +    KVM_CSR_CFG("satp", satp, sizeof(target_ulong), RISCV_CSR_REG(satp)),

We don't need to pass in sizeof(env_prop). We can just define KVM_CSR_CFG
to do it for us.

 #define KVM_CSR_CFG(_name, csr, reg_id) \
     { .name = _name, .offset = ENV_CSR_OFFSET(csr), \
       .prop_size = sizeof(((CPURISCVState *)0)->csr), \
       .kvm_reg_id = reg_id, }

But I don't think we need it at all. See below.

> +};
> +
> +static void *kvmconfig_get_env_addr(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
> +{
> +    return (void *)&cpu->env + csr_cfg->offset;
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)

This should return a uint32_t.

> +{
> +    uint32_t *val32 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> +    return *val32;
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t kvm_cpu_csr_get_u64(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
> +{
> +    uint64_t *val64 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> +    return *val64;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg,
> +                                uint32_t val)
> +{
> +    uint32_t *val32 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> +    *val32 = val;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg,
> +                                uint64_t val)
> +{
> +    uint64_t *val64 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> +    *val64 = val;
> +}
> +
>  #define KVM_EXT_CFG(_name, _prop, _reg_id) \
>      {.name = _name, .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop), \
>       .kvm_reg_id = _reg_id}
> @@ -598,34 +631,48 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
>  
>  static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
>  {
> -    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
> +    uint64_t reg;
> +    int i, ret;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
> +        KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
>  
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sie, env->mie);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, stvec, env->stvec);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sscratch, env->sscratch);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sepc, env->sepc);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, scause, env->scause);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, stval, env->stval);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sip, env->mip);
> -    KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, satp, env->satp);
> +        ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, &reg);
> +        if (ret) {
> +            return ret;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (csr_cfg->prop_size == sizeof(uint32_t)) {

 if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
     kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
 } else if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
     kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
 } else {
     uh, oh...
 }

> +            kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
> +        } else {
> +            kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
> +        }
> +    }
>  
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
>  {
> -    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
> +    uint64_t reg;
> +    int i, ret;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
> +        KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
> +
> +        if (csr_cfg->prop_size == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
> +            reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(cpu, csr_cfg);
> +        } else {
> +            reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u64(cpu, csr_cfg);
> +        }

same comment as above

>  
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sie, env->mie);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, stvec, env->stvec);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sscratch, env->sscratch);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sepc, env->sepc);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, scause, env->scause);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, stval, env->stval);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sip, env->mip);
> -    KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, satp, env->satp);
> +        ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, &reg);
> +        if (ret) {
> +            return ret;
> +        }
> +    }
>  
>      return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
>

Thanks,
drew


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-23 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-17 12:48 [PATCH 0/7] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] target/riscv/kvm: minor fixes/tweaks Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] target/riscv/kvm: turn u32/u64 reg functions in macros Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] target/riscv/kvm: turn kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() in a macro Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[] Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-23 15:15   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2025-04-23 19:45     ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-24  8:19       ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] target/riscv/kvm: do not read unavailable CSRs Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-23 15:25   ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-24 12:36     ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] target/riscv/kvm: add missing KVM CSRs Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-23 15:28   ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] target/riscv/kvm: reset 'scounteren' with host val Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-23 15:46   ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-23 18:06     ` Andrea Bolognani
2025-04-23 18:46       ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-24  9:07     ` Daniel Henrique Barboza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250423-9623c5901480c9e7be10d9e5@orel \
    --to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=abologna@redhat.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).