* [PATCH v3 1/9] target/riscv/kvm: minor fixes/tweaks
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 11:34 ` Alistair Francis
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] target/riscv/kvm: fix leak in kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg() Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
Remove an unused 'KVMScratchCPU' pointer argument in
kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support().
Put kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr() after kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(). This will
make a future patch diff easier to read, when changes in
kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr() and kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr() will be made.
Fixes: a6b53378f5 ("target/riscv/kvm: implement SBI debug console (DBCN) calls")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index 9214ce490c..accad4c28e 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -613,19 +613,6 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
return ret;
}
-static void kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr(CPURISCVState *env)
-{
- env->mstatus = 0;
- env->mie = 0;
- env->stvec = 0;
- env->sscratch = 0;
- env->sepc = 0;
- env->scause = 0;
- env->stval = 0;
- env->mip = 0;
- env->satp = 0;
-}
-
static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
{
CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
@@ -660,6 +647,19 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
return 0;
}
+static void kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr(CPURISCVState *env)
+{
+ env->mstatus = 0;
+ env->mie = 0;
+ env->stvec = 0;
+ env->sscratch = 0;
+ env->sepc = 0;
+ env->scause = 0;
+ env->stval = 0;
+ env->mip = 0;
+ env->satp = 0;
+}
+
static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -1078,7 +1078,6 @@ static int uint64_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
}
static void kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(RISCVCPU *cpu,
- KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
struct kvm_reg_list *reglist)
{
struct kvm_reg_list *reg_search;
@@ -1197,7 +1196,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
kvm_riscv_read_vlenb(cpu, kvmcpu, reglist);
}
- kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(cpu, kvmcpu, reglist);
+ kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(cpu, reglist);
}
static void riscv_init_kvm_registers(Object *cpu_obj)
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] target/riscv/kvm: minor fixes/tweaks
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] target/riscv/kvm: minor fixes/tweaks Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-28 11:34 ` Alistair Francis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2025-04-28 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer, ajones
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 2:05 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Remove an unused 'KVMScratchCPU' pointer argument in
> kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support().
>
> Put kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr() after kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(). This will
> make a future patch diff easier to read, when changes in
> kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr() and kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr() will be made.
>
> Fixes: a6b53378f5 ("target/riscv/kvm: implement SBI debug console (DBCN) calls")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index 9214ce490c..accad4c28e 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -613,19 +613,6 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr(CPURISCVState *env)
> -{
> - env->mstatus = 0;
> - env->mie = 0;
> - env->stvec = 0;
> - env->sscratch = 0;
> - env->sepc = 0;
> - env->scause = 0;
> - env->stval = 0;
> - env->mip = 0;
> - env->satp = 0;
> -}
> -
> static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> {
> CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> @@ -660,6 +647,19 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr(CPURISCVState *env)
> +{
> + env->mstatus = 0;
> + env->mie = 0;
> + env->stvec = 0;
> + env->sscratch = 0;
> + env->sepc = 0;
> + env->scause = 0;
> + env->stval = 0;
> + env->mip = 0;
> + env->satp = 0;
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,6 @@ static int uint64_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> }
>
> static void kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> - KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
> struct kvm_reg_list *reglist)
> {
> struct kvm_reg_list *reg_search;
> @@ -1197,7 +1196,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
> kvm_riscv_read_vlenb(cpu, kvmcpu, reglist);
> }
>
> - kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(cpu, kvmcpu, reglist);
> + kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(cpu, reglist);
> }
>
> static void riscv_init_kvm_registers(Object *cpu_obj)
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/9] target/riscv/kvm: fix leak in kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg()
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] target/riscv/kvm: minor fixes/tweaks Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 11:35 ` Alistair Francis
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn u32/u64 reg functions into macros Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
'reglist' is being g-malloc'ed but never freed.
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index accad4c28e..6ba122f360 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -1119,10 +1119,10 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_vlenb(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
{
+ g_autofree struct kvm_reg_list *reglist = NULL;
KVMCPUConfig *multi_ext_cfg;
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
struct kvm_reg_list rl_struct;
- struct kvm_reg_list *reglist;
uint64_t val, reg_id, *reg_search;
int i, ret;
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] target/riscv/kvm: fix leak in kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg()
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] target/riscv/kvm: fix leak in kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg() Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-28 11:35 ` Alistair Francis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2025-04-28 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer, ajones
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 2:06 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> 'reglist' is being g-malloc'ed but never freed.
>
> Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index accad4c28e..6ba122f360 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -1119,10 +1119,10 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_vlenb(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
>
> static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
> {
> + g_autofree struct kvm_reg_list *reglist = NULL;
> KVMCPUConfig *multi_ext_cfg;
> struct kvm_one_reg reg;
> struct kvm_reg_list rl_struct;
> - struct kvm_reg_list *reglist;
> uint64_t val, reg_id, *reg_search;
> int i, ret;
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn u32/u64 reg functions into macros
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] target/riscv/kvm: minor fixes/tweaks Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] target/riscv/kvm: fix leak in kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg() Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 11:37 ` Alistair Francis
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() into a macro Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
This change is motivated by a future change w.r.t CSRs management. We
want to handle them the same way as KVM extensions, i.e. a static array
with KVMCPUConfig objs that will be read/write during init and so on.
But to do that properly we must be able to declare a static array that
hold KVM regs.
C does not allow to init static arrays and use functions as
initializers, e.g. we can't do:
.kvm_reg_id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(...)
When instantiating the array. We can do that with macros though, so our
goal is turn kvm_riscv_reg_ulong() in a macro. It is cleaner to turn
every other reg_id_*() function in macros, and ulong will end up using
the macros for u32 and u64, so we'll start with them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index 6ba122f360..c91ecdfe59 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ void riscv_kvm_aplic_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
static bool cap_has_mp_state;
+#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U32(type, idx) (KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | \
+ type | idx)
+
+#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(type, idx) (KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | \
+ type | idx)
+
static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t type,
uint64_t idx)
{
@@ -76,16 +82,6 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t type,
return id;
}
-static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_u32(uint64_t type, uint64_t idx)
-{
- return KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | type | idx;
-}
-
-static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64(uint64_t type, uint64_t idx)
-{
- return KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | type | idx;
-}
-
static uint64_t kvm_encode_reg_size_id(uint64_t id, size_t size_b)
{
uint64_t size_ctz = __builtin_ctz(size_b);
@@ -119,12 +115,12 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(name))
-#define RISCV_TIMER_REG(name) kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64(KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER, \
+#define RISCV_TIMER_REG(name) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(name))
-#define RISCV_FP_F_REG(idx) kvm_riscv_reg_id_u32(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_F, idx)
+#define RISCV_FP_F_REG(idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U32(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_F, idx)
-#define RISCV_FP_D_REG(idx) kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D, idx)
+#define RISCV_FP_D_REG(idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D, idx)
#define RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, name) \
kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn u32/u64 reg functions into macros
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn u32/u64 reg functions into macros Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-28 11:37 ` Alistair Francis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2025-04-28 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer, ajones
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 2:03 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> This change is motivated by a future change w.r.t CSRs management. We
> want to handle them the same way as KVM extensions, i.e. a static array
> with KVMCPUConfig objs that will be read/write during init and so on.
> But to do that properly we must be able to declare a static array that
> hold KVM regs.
>
> C does not allow to init static arrays and use functions as
> initializers, e.g. we can't do:
>
> .kvm_reg_id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(...)
>
> When instantiating the array. We can do that with macros though, so our
> goal is turn kvm_riscv_reg_ulong() in a macro. It is cleaner to turn
> every other reg_id_*() function in macros, and ulong will end up using
> the macros for u32 and u64, so we'll start with them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index 6ba122f360..c91ecdfe59 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ void riscv_kvm_aplic_request(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
>
> static bool cap_has_mp_state;
>
> +#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U32(type, idx) (KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | \
> + type | idx)
> +
> +#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(type, idx) (KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | \
> + type | idx)
> +
> static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t type,
> uint64_t idx)
> {
> @@ -76,16 +82,6 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t type,
> return id;
> }
>
> -static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_u32(uint64_t type, uint64_t idx)
> -{
> - return KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | type | idx;
> -}
> -
> -static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64(uint64_t type, uint64_t idx)
> -{
> - return KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | type | idx;
> -}
> -
> static uint64_t kvm_encode_reg_size_id(uint64_t id, size_t size_b)
> {
> uint64_t size_ctz = __builtin_ctz(size_b);
> @@ -119,12 +115,12 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(name))
>
> -#define RISCV_TIMER_REG(name) kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64(KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER, \
> +#define RISCV_TIMER_REG(name) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(name))
>
> -#define RISCV_FP_F_REG(idx) kvm_riscv_reg_id_u32(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_F, idx)
> +#define RISCV_FP_F_REG(idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U32(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_F, idx)
>
> -#define RISCV_FP_D_REG(idx) kvm_riscv_reg_id_u64(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D, idx)
> +#define RISCV_FP_D_REG(idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D, idx)
>
> #define RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, name) \
> kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 4/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() into a macro
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn u32/u64 reg functions into macros Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 11:41 ` Alistair Francis
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[] Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
We need the reg_id_ulong() helper to be a macro to be able to create a
static array of KVMCPUConfig that will hold CSR information.
Despite the amount of changes all of them are tedious/trivial:
- replace instances of "kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong" with
"KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG";
- RISCV_CORE_REG(), RISCV_CSR_REG(), RISCV_CONFIG_REG() and
RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG() only receives one 'name' arg. Remove unneeded
'env' variables when applicable.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index c91ecdfe59..fd66bc1759 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -64,23 +64,11 @@ static bool cap_has_mp_state;
#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(type, idx) (KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | \
type | idx)
-static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t type,
- uint64_t idx)
-{
- uint64_t id = KVM_REG_RISCV | type | idx;
-
- switch (riscv_cpu_mxl(env)) {
- case MXL_RV32:
- id |= KVM_REG_SIZE_U32;
- break;
- case MXL_RV64:
- id |= KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
- break;
- default:
- g_assert_not_reached();
- }
- return id;
-}
+#if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
+#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(type, idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(type, idx)
+#else
+#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(type, idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U32(type, idx)
+#endif
static uint64_t kvm_encode_reg_size_id(uint64_t id, size_t size_b)
{
@@ -103,16 +91,16 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
return kvm_encode_reg_size_id(id, size_b);
}
-#define RISCV_CORE_REG(env, name) \
- kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, \
+#define RISCV_CORE_REG(name) \
+ KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(name))
-#define RISCV_CSR_REG(env, name) \
- kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR, \
+#define RISCV_CSR_REG(name) \
+ KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(name))
-#define RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, name) \
- kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG, \
+#define RISCV_CONFIG_REG(name) \
+ KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(name))
#define RISCV_TIMER_REG(name) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER, \
@@ -122,13 +110,13 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
#define RISCV_FP_D_REG(idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D, idx)
-#define RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, name) \
- kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
+#define RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name) \
+ KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name))
#define KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
do { \
- int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, csr), ®); \
+ int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
if (_ret) { \
return _ret; \
} \
@@ -136,7 +124,7 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
#define KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
do { \
- int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, csr), ®); \
+ int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
if (_ret) { \
return _ret; \
} \
@@ -244,7 +232,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_misa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
/* If we're here we're going to disable the MISA bit */
reg = 0;
- id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
+ id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
misa_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
if (ret != 0) {
@@ -430,7 +418,6 @@ static KVMCPUConfig kvm_sbi_dbcn = {
static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_cfg_isa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
uint64_t id, reg;
int i, ret;
@@ -441,7 +428,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_cfg_isa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
continue;
}
- id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
+ id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
multi_ext_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
reg = kvm_cpu_cfg_get(cpu, multi_ext_cfg);
ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
@@ -566,14 +553,14 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
target_ulong reg;
CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
- ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(env, regs.pc), ®);
+ ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
env->pc = reg;
for (i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
- uint64_t id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
+ uint64_t id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
@@ -592,13 +579,13 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
reg = env->pc;
- ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(env, regs.pc), ®);
+ ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
for (i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
- uint64_t id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
+ uint64_t id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
reg = env->gpr[i];
ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
if (ret) {
@@ -796,26 +783,26 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_vector(CPUState *cs)
return 0;
}
- ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vstart), ®);
+ ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vstart), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
env->vstart = reg;
- ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vl), ®);
+ ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vl), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
env->vl = reg;
- ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vtype), ®);
+ ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vtype), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
env->vtype = reg;
if (kvm_v_vlenb.supported) {
- ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vlenb), ®);
+ ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vlenb), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
@@ -853,26 +840,26 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_vector(CPUState *cs)
}
reg = env->vstart;
- ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vstart), ®);
+ ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vstart), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
reg = env->vl;
- ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vl), ®);
+ ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vl), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
reg = env->vtype;
- ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vtype), ®);
+ ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vtype), ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
}
if (kvm_v_vlenb.supported) {
reg = cpu->cfg.vlenb;
- ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vlenb), ®);
+ ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vlenb), ®);
for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
/*
@@ -951,25 +938,24 @@ static void kvm_riscv_destroy_scratch_vcpu(KVMScratchCPU *scratch)
static void kvm_riscv_init_machine_ids(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
int ret;
- reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mvendorid);
+ reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mvendorid);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&cpu->cfg.mvendorid;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
if (ret != 0) {
error_report("Unable to retrieve mvendorid from host, error %d", ret);
}
- reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, marchid);
+ reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(marchid);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&cpu->cfg.marchid;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
if (ret != 0) {
error_report("Unable to retrieve marchid from host, error %d", ret);
}
- reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mimpid);
+ reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mimpid);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&cpu->cfg.mimpid;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
if (ret != 0) {
@@ -984,7 +970,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(RISCVCPU *cpu,
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
int ret;
- reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, isa);
+ reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(isa);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&env->misa_ext_mask;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
@@ -1001,11 +987,10 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(RISCVCPU *cpu,
static void kvm_riscv_read_cbomz_blksize(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
KVMCPUConfig *cbomz_cfg)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
int ret;
- reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
+ reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
cbomz_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)kvmconfig_get_cfg_addr(cpu, cbomz_cfg);
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
@@ -1019,7 +1004,6 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_cbomz_blksize(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
static void kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(RISCVCPU *cpu,
KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
uint64_t val;
int i, ret;
@@ -1027,7 +1011,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(RISCVCPU *cpu,
KVMCPUConfig *multi_ext_cfg = &kvm_multi_ext_cfgs[i];
struct kvm_one_reg reg;
- reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
+ reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
multi_ext_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
@@ -1159,7 +1143,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_multi_ext_cfgs); i++) {
multi_ext_cfg = &kvm_multi_ext_cfgs[i];
- reg_id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(&cpu->env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
+ reg_id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
multi_ext_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
reg_search = bsearch(®_id, reglist->reg, reglist->n,
sizeof(uint64_t), uint64_cmp);
@@ -1338,12 +1322,11 @@ void kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
static int kvm_vcpu_set_machine_ids(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
target_ulong reg;
uint64_t id;
int ret;
- id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mvendorid);
+ id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mvendorid);
/*
* cfg.mvendorid is an uint32 but a target_ulong will
* be written. Assign it to a target_ulong var to avoid
@@ -1355,13 +1338,13 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_set_machine_ids(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
return ret;
}
- id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, marchid);
+ id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(marchid);
ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, &cpu->cfg.marchid);
if (ret != 0) {
return ret;
}
- id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mimpid);
+ id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mimpid);
ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, &cpu->cfg.mimpid);
return ret;
@@ -1911,7 +1894,7 @@ void riscv_kvm_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
if (cpu->cfg.ext_zicbom &&
riscv_cpu_option_set(kvm_cbom_blocksize.name)) {
- reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
+ reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
kvm_cbom_blocksize.kvm_reg_id);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu.cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
@@ -1930,7 +1913,7 @@ void riscv_kvm_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
if (cpu->cfg.ext_zicboz &&
riscv_cpu_option_set(kvm_cboz_blocksize.name)) {
- reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
+ reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
kvm_cboz_blocksize.kvm_reg_id);
reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
ret = ioctl(kvmcpu.cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() into a macro
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() into a macro Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-28 11:41 ` Alistair Francis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2025-04-28 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer, ajones
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 2:04 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> We need the reg_id_ulong() helper to be a macro to be able to create a
> static array of KVMCPUConfig that will hold CSR information.
>
> Despite the amount of changes all of them are tedious/trivial:
>
> - replace instances of "kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong" with
> "KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG";
>
> - RISCV_CORE_REG(), RISCV_CSR_REG(), RISCV_CONFIG_REG() and
> RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG() only receives one 'name' arg. Remove unneeded
> 'env' variables when applicable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index c91ecdfe59..fd66bc1759 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -64,23 +64,11 @@ static bool cap_has_mp_state;
> #define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(type, idx) (KVM_REG_RISCV | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | \
> type | idx)
>
> -static uint64_t kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t type,
> - uint64_t idx)
> -{
> - uint64_t id = KVM_REG_RISCV | type | idx;
> -
> - switch (riscv_cpu_mxl(env)) {
> - case MXL_RV32:
> - id |= KVM_REG_SIZE_U32;
> - break;
> - case MXL_RV64:
> - id |= KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
> - break;
> - default:
> - g_assert_not_reached();
> - }
> - return id;
> -}
> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> +#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(type, idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(type, idx)
> +#else
> +#define KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(type, idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U32(type, idx)
> +#endif
>
> static uint64_t kvm_encode_reg_size_id(uint64_t id, size_t size_b)
> {
> @@ -103,16 +91,16 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> return kvm_encode_reg_size_id(id, size_b);
> }
>
> -#define RISCV_CORE_REG(env, name) \
> - kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, \
> +#define RISCV_CORE_REG(name) \
> + KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE_REG(name))
>
> -#define RISCV_CSR_REG(env, name) \
> - kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR, \
> +#define RISCV_CSR_REG(name) \
> + KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(name))
>
> -#define RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, name) \
> - kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG, \
> +#define RISCV_CONFIG_REG(name) \
> + KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(name))
>
> #define RISCV_TIMER_REG(name) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER, \
> @@ -122,13 +110,13 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
>
> #define RISCV_FP_D_REG(idx) KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_U64(KVM_REG_RISCV_FP_D, idx)
>
> -#define RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, name) \
> - kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
> +#define RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name) \
> + KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name))
>
> #define KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
> do { \
> - int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, csr), ®); \
> + int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
> if (_ret) { \
> return _ret; \
> } \
> @@ -136,7 +124,7 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
>
> #define KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
> do { \
> - int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, csr), ®); \
> + int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
> if (_ret) { \
> return _ret; \
> } \
> @@ -244,7 +232,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_misa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
>
> /* If we're here we're going to disable the MISA bit */
> reg = 0;
> - id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> + id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> misa_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
> ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
> if (ret != 0) {
> @@ -430,7 +418,6 @@ static KVMCPUConfig kvm_sbi_dbcn = {
>
> static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_cfg_isa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> uint64_t id, reg;
> int i, ret;
>
> @@ -441,7 +428,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_cfg_isa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
> continue;
> }
>
> - id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> + id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> multi_ext_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
> reg = kvm_cpu_cfg_get(cpu, multi_ext_cfg);
> ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
> @@ -566,14 +553,14 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> target_ulong reg;
> CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
>
> - ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(env, regs.pc), ®);
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> env->pc = reg;
>
> for (i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
> - uint64_t id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
> + uint64_t id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
> ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> @@ -592,13 +579,13 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
>
> reg = env->pc;
> - ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(env, regs.pc), ®);
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(regs.pc), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
>
> for (i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
> - uint64_t id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
> + uint64_t id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
> reg = env->gpr[i];
> ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, ®);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -796,26 +783,26 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_vector(CPUState *cs)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vstart), ®);
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vstart), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> env->vstart = reg;
>
> - ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vl), ®);
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vl), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> env->vl = reg;
>
> - ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vtype), ®);
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vtype), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> env->vtype = reg;
>
> if (kvm_v_vlenb.supported) {
> - ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vlenb), ®);
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vlenb), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -853,26 +840,26 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_vector(CPUState *cs)
> }
>
> reg = env->vstart;
> - ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vstart), ®);
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vstart), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
>
> reg = env->vl;
> - ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vl), ®);
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vl), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
>
> reg = env->vtype;
> - ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vtype), ®);
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vtype), ®);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
>
> if (kvm_v_vlenb.supported) {
> reg = cpu->cfg.vlenb;
> - ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(env, vlenb), ®);
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(vlenb), ®);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> /*
> @@ -951,25 +938,24 @@ static void kvm_riscv_destroy_scratch_vcpu(KVMScratchCPU *scratch)
>
> static void kvm_riscv_init_machine_ids(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> struct kvm_one_reg reg;
> int ret;
>
> - reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mvendorid);
> + reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mvendorid);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&cpu->cfg.mvendorid;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> if (ret != 0) {
> error_report("Unable to retrieve mvendorid from host, error %d", ret);
> }
>
> - reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, marchid);
> + reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(marchid);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&cpu->cfg.marchid;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> if (ret != 0) {
> error_report("Unable to retrieve marchid from host, error %d", ret);
> }
>
> - reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mimpid);
> + reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mimpid);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&cpu->cfg.mimpid;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> if (ret != 0) {
> @@ -984,7 +970,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> struct kvm_one_reg reg;
> int ret;
>
> - reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, isa);
> + reg.id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(isa);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&env->misa_ext_mask;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
>
> @@ -1001,11 +987,10 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> static void kvm_riscv_read_cbomz_blksize(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
> KVMCPUConfig *cbomz_cfg)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> struct kvm_one_reg reg;
> int ret;
>
> - reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
> + reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
> cbomz_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)kvmconfig_get_cfg_addr(cpu, cbomz_cfg);
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> @@ -1019,7 +1004,6 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_cbomz_blksize(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
> static void kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> uint64_t val;
> int i, ret;
>
> @@ -1027,7 +1011,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> KVMCPUConfig *multi_ext_cfg = &kvm_multi_ext_cfgs[i];
> struct kvm_one_reg reg;
>
> - reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> + reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> multi_ext_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> @@ -1159,7 +1143,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_multi_ext_cfgs); i++) {
> multi_ext_cfg = &kvm_multi_ext_cfgs[i];
> - reg_id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(&cpu->env, KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> + reg_id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT,
> multi_ext_cfg->kvm_reg_id);
> reg_search = bsearch(®_id, reglist->reg, reglist->n,
> sizeof(uint64_t), uint64_cmp);
> @@ -1338,12 +1322,11 @@ void kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
>
> static int kvm_vcpu_set_machine_ids(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &cpu->env;
> target_ulong reg;
> uint64_t id;
> int ret;
>
> - id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mvendorid);
> + id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mvendorid);
> /*
> * cfg.mvendorid is an uint32 but a target_ulong will
> * be written. Assign it to a target_ulong var to avoid
> @@ -1355,13 +1338,13 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_set_machine_ids(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, marchid);
> + id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(marchid);
> ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, &cpu->cfg.marchid);
> if (ret != 0) {
> return ret;
> }
>
> - id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(env, mimpid);
> + id = RISCV_CONFIG_REG(mimpid);
> ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, &cpu->cfg.mimpid);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1911,7 +1894,7 @@ void riscv_kvm_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> if (cpu->cfg.ext_zicbom &&
> riscv_cpu_option_set(kvm_cbom_blocksize.name)) {
>
> - reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
> + reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
> kvm_cbom_blocksize.kvm_reg_id);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu.cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> @@ -1930,7 +1913,7 @@ void riscv_kvm_cpu_finalize_features(RISCVCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> if (cpu->cfg.ext_zicboz &&
> riscv_cpu_option_set(kvm_cboz_blocksize.name)) {
>
> - reg.id = kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
> + reg.id = KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG,
> kvm_cboz_blocksize.kvm_reg_id);
> reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
> ret = ioctl(kvmcpu.cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 5/9] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[]
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] target/riscv/kvm: turn kvm_riscv_reg_id_ulong() into a macro Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:01 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 11:44 ` Alistair Francis
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] target/riscv/kvm: do not read unavailable CSRs Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
At this moment we're not checking if the host has support for any
specific CSR before doing get/put regs. This will cause problems if the
host KVM doesn't support it (see [1] as an example).
We'll use the same approach done with the CPU extensions: read all known
KVM CSRs during init() to check for availability, then read/write them
if they are present. This will be made by either using get-reglist or by
directly reading the CSRs.
For now we'll just convert the CSRs to use a kvm_csr_cfg[] array,
reusing the same KVMCPUConfig abstraction we use for extensions, and use
the array in (get|put)_csr_regs() instead of manually listing them. A
lot of boilerplate will be added but at least we'll automate the get/put
procedure for CSRs, i.e. adding a new CSR in the future will be a matter
of adding it in kvm_csr_regs[] and everything else will be taken care
of.
Despite all the code changes no behavioral change is made.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/CABJz62OfUDHYkQ0T3rGHStQprf1c7_E0qBLbLKhfv=+jb0SYAw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu.h | 1 +
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 679f417336..f5a60d0c52 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_name(uint32_t bit);
const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_description(uint32_t bit);
#define CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop) offsetof(struct RISCVCPUConfig, _prop)
+#define ENV_CSR_OFFSET(_csr) offsetof(CPURISCVState, _csr)
typedef struct riscv_cpu_profile {
struct riscv_cpu_profile *u_parent;
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index fd66bc1759..f881e7eb5d 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -114,22 +114,6 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name))
-#define KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
- do { \
- int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
- if (_ret) { \
- return _ret; \
- } \
- } while (0)
-
-#define KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
- do { \
- int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
- if (_ret) { \
- return _ret; \
- } \
- } while (0)
-
#define KVM_RISCV_GET_TIMER(cs, name, reg) \
do { \
int ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_TIMER_REG(name), ®); \
@@ -251,6 +235,53 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_misa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
}
}
+#define KVM_CSR_CFG(_name, _env_prop, reg_id) \
+ {.name = _name, .offset = ENV_CSR_OFFSET(_env_prop), \
+ .kvm_reg_id = reg_id}
+
+static KVMCPUConfig kvm_csr_cfgs[] = {
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("sstatus", mstatus, RISCV_CSR_REG(sstatus)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("sie", mie, RISCV_CSR_REG(sie)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("stvec", stvec, RISCV_CSR_REG(stvec)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("sscratch", sscratch, RISCV_CSR_REG(sscratch)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("sepc", sepc, RISCV_CSR_REG(sepc)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("scause", scause, RISCV_CSR_REG(scause)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("stval", stval, RISCV_CSR_REG(stval)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("sip", mip, RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("satp", satp, RISCV_CSR_REG(satp)),
+};
+
+static void *kvmconfig_get_env_addr(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
+{
+ return (void *)&cpu->env + csr_cfg->offset;
+}
+
+static uint32_t kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
+{
+ uint32_t *val32 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
+ return *val32;
+}
+
+static uint64_t kvm_cpu_csr_get_u64(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
+{
+ uint64_t *val64 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
+ return *val64;
+}
+
+static void kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg,
+ uint32_t val)
+{
+ uint32_t *val32 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
+ *val32 = val;
+}
+
+static void kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg,
+ uint64_t val)
+{
+ uint64_t *val64 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
+ *val64 = val;
+}
+
#define KVM_EXT_CFG(_name, _prop, _reg_id) \
{.name = _name, .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop), \
.kvm_reg_id = _reg_id}
@@ -598,34 +629,52 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
+ RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
+ uint64_t reg;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
+ KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sie, env->mie);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, stvec, env->stvec);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sscratch, env->sscratch);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sepc, env->sepc);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, scause, env->scause);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, stval, env->stval);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sip, env->mip);
- KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, satp, env->satp);
+ ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
+ kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
+ } else if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
+ kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
+ } else {
+ g_assert_not_reached();
+ }
+ }
return 0;
}
static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
{
- CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
+ RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
+ uint64_t reg;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
+ KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
+
+ if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
+ reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(cpu, csr_cfg);
+ } else if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
+ reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u64(cpu, csr_cfg);
+ } else {
+ g_assert_not_reached();
+ }
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sie, env->mie);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, stvec, env->stvec);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sscratch, env->sscratch);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sepc, env->sepc);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, scause, env->scause);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, stval, env->stval);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sip, env->mip);
- KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, satp, env->satp);
+ ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, ®);
+ if (ret) {
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[]
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[] Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-28 11:44 ` Alistair Francis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Alistair Francis @ 2025-04-28 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer, ajones
On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 2:04 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> At this moment we're not checking if the host has support for any
> specific CSR before doing get/put regs. This will cause problems if the
> host KVM doesn't support it (see [1] as an example).
>
> We'll use the same approach done with the CPU extensions: read all known
> KVM CSRs during init() to check for availability, then read/write them
> if they are present. This will be made by either using get-reglist or by
> directly reading the CSRs.
>
> For now we'll just convert the CSRs to use a kvm_csr_cfg[] array,
> reusing the same KVMCPUConfig abstraction we use for extensions, and use
> the array in (get|put)_csr_regs() instead of manually listing them. A
> lot of boilerplate will be added but at least we'll automate the get/put
> procedure for CSRs, i.e. adding a new CSR in the future will be a matter
> of adding it in kvm_csr_regs[] and everything else will be taken care
> of.
>
> Despite all the code changes no behavioral change is made.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/CABJz62OfUDHYkQ0T3rGHStQprf1c7_E0qBLbLKhfv=+jb0SYAw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.h | 1 +
> target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index 679f417336..f5a60d0c52 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_name(uint32_t bit);
> const char *riscv_get_misa_ext_description(uint32_t bit);
>
> #define CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop) offsetof(struct RISCVCPUConfig, _prop)
> +#define ENV_CSR_OFFSET(_csr) offsetof(CPURISCVState, _csr)
>
> typedef struct riscv_cpu_profile {
> struct riscv_cpu_profile *u_parent;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> index fd66bc1759..f881e7eb5d 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -114,22 +114,6 @@ static uint64_t kvm_riscv_vector_reg_id(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> KVM_RISCV_REG_ID_ULONG(KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR, \
> KVM_REG_RISCV_VECTOR_CSR_REG(name))
>
> -#define KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
> - do { \
> - int _ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
> - if (_ret) { \
> - return _ret; \
> - } \
> - } while (0)
> -
> -#define KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, csr, reg) \
> - do { \
> - int _ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(csr), ®); \
> - if (_ret) { \
> - return _ret; \
> - } \
> - } while (0)
> -
> #define KVM_RISCV_GET_TIMER(cs, name, reg) \
> do { \
> int ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, RISCV_TIMER_REG(name), ®); \
> @@ -251,6 +235,53 @@ static void kvm_riscv_update_cpu_misa_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu, CPUState *cs)
> }
> }
>
> +#define KVM_CSR_CFG(_name, _env_prop, reg_id) \
> + {.name = _name, .offset = ENV_CSR_OFFSET(_env_prop), \
> + .kvm_reg_id = reg_id}
> +
> +static KVMCPUConfig kvm_csr_cfgs[] = {
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("sstatus", mstatus, RISCV_CSR_REG(sstatus)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("sie", mie, RISCV_CSR_REG(sie)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("stvec", stvec, RISCV_CSR_REG(stvec)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("sscratch", sscratch, RISCV_CSR_REG(sscratch)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("sepc", sepc, RISCV_CSR_REG(sepc)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("scause", scause, RISCV_CSR_REG(scause)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("stval", stval, RISCV_CSR_REG(stval)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("sip", mip, RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)),
> + KVM_CSR_CFG("satp", satp, RISCV_CSR_REG(satp)),
> +};
> +
> +static void *kvmconfig_get_env_addr(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
> +{
> + return (void *)&cpu->env + csr_cfg->offset;
> +}
> +
> +static uint32_t kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
> +{
> + uint32_t *val32 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> + return *val32;
> +}
> +
> +static uint64_t kvm_cpu_csr_get_u64(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
> +{
> + uint64_t *val64 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> + return *val64;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg,
> + uint32_t val)
> +{
> + uint32_t *val32 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> + *val32 = val;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg,
> + uint64_t val)
> +{
> + uint64_t *val64 = kvmconfig_get_env_addr(cpu, csr_cfg);
> + *val64 = val;
> +}
> +
> #define KVM_EXT_CFG(_name, _prop, _reg_id) \
> {.name = _name, .offset = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(_prop), \
> .kvm_reg_id = _reg_id}
> @@ -598,34 +629,52 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
>
> static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> + RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
> + uint64_t reg;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
> + KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
>
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sie, env->mie);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, stvec, env->stvec);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sscratch, env->sscratch);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sepc, env->sepc);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, scause, env->scause);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, stval, env->stval);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, sip, env->mip);
> - KVM_RISCV_GET_CSR(cs, env, satp, env->satp);
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
> + kvm_cpu_csr_set_u32(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
> + } else if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
> + kvm_cpu_csr_set_u64(cpu, csr_cfg, reg);
> + } else {
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> {
> - CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> + RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
> + uint64_t reg;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
> + KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
> +
> + if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
> + reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(cpu, csr_cfg);
> + } else if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
> + reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u64(cpu, csr_cfg);
> + } else {
> + g_assert_not_reached();
> + }
>
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sstatus, env->mstatus);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sie, env->mie);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, stvec, env->stvec);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sscratch, env->sscratch);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sepc, env->sepc);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, scause, env->scause);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, stval, env->stval);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, sip, env->mip);
> - KVM_RISCV_SET_CSR(cs, env, satp, env->satp);
> + ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 6/9] target/riscv/kvm: do not read unavailable CSRs
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_csr_cfgs[] Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:02 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] target/riscv/kvm: add senvcfg CSR Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza, Andrea Bolognani
[1] reports that commit 4db19d5b21 broke a KVM guest running kernel 6.6.
This happens because the kernel does not know 'senvcfg', making it
unable to boot because QEMU is reading/wriiting it without any checks.
After converting the CSRs to do "automated" get/put reg procedures in
the previous patch we can now scan for availability. Two functions are
created:
- kvm_riscv_read_csr_cfg_legacy() will check if the CSR exists by brute
forcing KVM_GET_ONE_REG in each one of them, interpreting an EINVAL
return as indication that the CSR isn't available. This will be use in
absence of KVM_GET_REG_LIST;
- kvm_riscv_read_csr_cfg() will use the existing result of get_reg_list
to check if the CSRs ids are present.
kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg() is now kvm_riscv_init_cfg() to reflect that
the function is also dealing with CSRs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/CABJz62OfUDHYkQ0T3rGHStQprf1c7_E0qBLbLKhfv=+jb0SYAw@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 4db19d5b21 ("target/riscv/kvm: add missing KVM CSRs")
Reported-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index f881e7eb5d..1ce747d047 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -636,6 +636,10 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
+ if (!csr_cfg->supported) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id, ®);
if (ret) {
return ret;
@@ -662,6 +666,10 @@ static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
+ if (!csr_cfg->supported) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint32_t)) {
reg = kvm_cpu_csr_get_u32(cpu, csr_cfg);
} else if (KVM_REG_SIZE(csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id) == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
@@ -1090,6 +1098,32 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(RISCVCPU *cpu,
}
}
+static void kvm_riscv_read_csr_cfg_legacy(KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
+{
+ uint64_t val;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
+ KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
+ struct kvm_one_reg reg;
+
+ reg.id = csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id;
+ reg.addr = (uint64_t)&val;
+ ret = ioctl(kvmcpu->cpufd, KVM_GET_ONE_REG, ®);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ if (errno == EINVAL) {
+ csr_cfg->supported = false;
+ } else {
+ error_report("Unable to read KVM CSR %s: %s",
+ csr_cfg->name, strerror(errno));
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+ } else {
+ csr_cfg->supported = true;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static int uint64_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
{
uint64_t val1 = *(const uint64_t *)a;
@@ -1146,7 +1180,26 @@ static void kvm_riscv_read_vlenb(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu,
}
}
-static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
+static void kvm_riscv_read_csr_cfg(struct kvm_reg_list *reglist)
+{
+ struct kvm_reg_list *reg_search;
+ uint64_t reg_id;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_csr_cfgs); i++) {
+ KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg = &kvm_csr_cfgs[i];
+
+ reg_id = csr_cfg->kvm_reg_id;
+ reg_search = bsearch(®_id, reglist->reg, reglist->n,
+ sizeof(uint64_t), uint64_cmp);
+ if (!reg_search) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ csr_cfg->supported = true;
+ }
+}
+
+static void kvm_riscv_init_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
{
g_autofree struct kvm_reg_list *reglist = NULL;
KVMCPUConfig *multi_ext_cfg;
@@ -1163,7 +1216,9 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
* (EINVAL). Use read_legacy() in this case.
*/
if (errno == EINVAL) {
- return kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(cpu, kvmcpu);
+ kvm_riscv_read_multiext_legacy(cpu, kvmcpu);
+ kvm_riscv_read_csr_cfg_legacy(kvmcpu);
+ return;
} else if (errno != E2BIG) {
/*
* E2BIG is an expected error message for the API since we
@@ -1226,6 +1281,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMScratchCPU *kvmcpu)
}
kvm_riscv_check_sbi_dbcn_support(cpu, reglist);
+ kvm_riscv_read_csr_cfg(reglist);
}
static void riscv_init_kvm_registers(Object *cpu_obj)
@@ -1239,7 +1295,7 @@ static void riscv_init_kvm_registers(Object *cpu_obj)
kvm_riscv_init_machine_ids(cpu, &kvmcpu);
kvm_riscv_init_misa_ext_mask(cpu, &kvmcpu);
- kvm_riscv_init_multiext_cfg(cpu, &kvmcpu);
+ kvm_riscv_init_cfg(cpu, &kvmcpu);
kvm_riscv_destroy_scratch_vcpu(&kvmcpu);
}
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 7/9] target/riscv/kvm: add senvcfg CSR
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] target/riscv/kvm: do not read unavailable CSRs Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:02 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] target/riscv/kvm: add scounteren CSR Daniel Henrique Barboza
8 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
We're missing the senvcfg CSRs which is already present in the
KVM UAPI.
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index 1ce747d047..5efee8adb2 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ static KVMCPUConfig kvm_csr_cfgs[] = {
KVM_CSR_CFG("stval", stval, RISCV_CSR_REG(stval)),
KVM_CSR_CFG("sip", mip, RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)),
KVM_CSR_CFG("satp", satp, RISCV_CSR_REG(satp)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("senvcfg", senvcfg, RISCV_CSR_REG(senvcfg)),
};
static void *kvmconfig_get_env_addr(RISCVCPU *cpu, KVMCPUConfig *csr_cfg)
@@ -698,6 +699,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr(CPURISCVState *env)
env->stval = 0;
env->mip = 0;
env->satp = 0;
+ env->senvcfg = 0;
}
static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] target/riscv/kvm: add senvcfg CSR Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:02 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:43 ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-27 5:59 ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] target/riscv/kvm: add scounteren CSR Daniel Henrique Barboza
8 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
We want to support scounteren as a KVM CSR. The KVM UAPI defines every
CSR size as target_ulong, and our env->scounteren is fixed at 32 bits.
The other existing cases where the property size does not match the KVM
reg size happens with uint64_t properties, like 'mstatus'. When running
a 32 bit CPU we'll write a 32 bit 'sstatus' KVM reg into the 64 bit
'mstatus' field. As long as we're consistent, i.e. we're always
reading/writing the same words, this is ok.
For scounteren, a KVM guest running in a 64 bit CPU will end up writing
a 64 bit reg in a 32 bit field. This will have all sort of funny side
effects in the KVM guest that we would rather avoid.
Increase scounteren to target_ulong to allow KVM to read/write the
scounteren CSR without any surprises.
Aside from bumping the version of the RISCVCPU vmstate no other
behavioral changes are expected.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu.h | 9 ++++++++-
target/riscv/machine.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index f5a60d0c52..66d4ddfcb4 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -400,7 +400,14 @@ struct CPUArchState {
*/
bool two_stage_indirect_lookup;
- uint32_t scounteren;
+ /*
+ * scounteren is supposed to be an uint32_t, as the spec
+ * says. We're using a target_ulong instead because the
+ * scounteren KVM CSR is defined as target_ulong in
+ * kvm_riscv_csr, and we want to avoid having to deal
+ * with an ulong reg being read/written in an uint32_t.
+ */
+ target_ulong scounteren;
uint32_t mcounteren;
uint32_t scountinhibit;
diff --git a/target/riscv/machine.c b/target/riscv/machine.c
index df2d5bad8d..f3477e153b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/machine.c
+++ b/target/riscv/machine.c
@@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ssp = {
const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
.name = "cpu",
- .version_id = 10,
- .minimum_version_id = 10,
+ .version_id = 11,
+ .minimum_version_id = 11,
.post_load = riscv_cpu_post_load,
.fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
VMSTATE_UINTTL_ARRAY(env.gpr, RISCVCPU, 32),
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.mtval, RISCVCPU),
VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.miselect, RISCVCPU),
VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.siselect, RISCVCPU),
- VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
+ VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcounteren, RISCVCPU),
VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:43 ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-27 5:59 ` Andrew Jones
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2025-04-25 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 01:02:02PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> We want to support scounteren as a KVM CSR. The KVM UAPI defines every
> CSR size as target_ulong, and our env->scounteren is fixed at 32 bits.
>
> The other existing cases where the property size does not match the KVM
> reg size happens with uint64_t properties, like 'mstatus'. When running
> a 32 bit CPU we'll write a 32 bit 'sstatus' KVM reg into the 64 bit
> 'mstatus' field. As long as we're consistent, i.e. we're always
> reading/writing the same words, this is ok.
>
> For scounteren, a KVM guest running in a 64 bit CPU will end up writing
> a 64 bit reg in a 32 bit field. This will have all sort of funny side
> effects in the KVM guest that we would rather avoid.
>
> Increase scounteren to target_ulong to allow KVM to read/write the
> scounteren CSR without any surprises.
>
> Aside from bumping the version of the RISCVCPU vmstate no other
> behavioral changes are expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.h | 9 ++++++++-
> target/riscv/machine.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-25 16:43 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2025-04-27 5:59 ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-28 11:34 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 12:27 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
1 sibling, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2025-04-27 5:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 01:02:02PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> We want to support scounteren as a KVM CSR. The KVM UAPI defines every
> CSR size as target_ulong, and our env->scounteren is fixed at 32 bits.
>
> The other existing cases where the property size does not match the KVM
> reg size happens with uint64_t properties, like 'mstatus'. When running
> a 32 bit CPU we'll write a 32 bit 'sstatus' KVM reg into the 64 bit
> 'mstatus' field. As long as we're consistent, i.e. we're always
> reading/writing the same words, this is ok.
>
> For scounteren, a KVM guest running in a 64 bit CPU will end up writing
> a 64 bit reg in a 32 bit field. This will have all sort of funny side
> effects in the KVM guest that we would rather avoid.
>
> Increase scounteren to target_ulong to allow KVM to read/write the
> scounteren CSR without any surprises.
>
> Aside from bumping the version of the RISCVCPU vmstate no other
> behavioral changes are expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.h | 9 ++++++++-
> target/riscv/machine.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index f5a60d0c52..66d4ddfcb4 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -400,7 +400,14 @@ struct CPUArchState {
> */
> bool two_stage_indirect_lookup;
>
> - uint32_t scounteren;
> + /*
> + * scounteren is supposed to be an uint32_t, as the spec
> + * says. We're using a target_ulong instead because the
> + * scounteren KVM CSR is defined as target_ulong in
> + * kvm_riscv_csr, and we want to avoid having to deal
> + * with an ulong reg being read/written in an uint32_t.
> + */
> + target_ulong scounteren;
I'm having second thoughts about this. It seems like it should be
avoidable with the use of an intermediary buffer (which we already
have -- the uint64_t reg) and with tracking the size of the env state
by capturing the size with the new macro used to build the array.
Then,
for reading:
1. read the kvm reg into a buffer of the size kvm says it is
2. only write the bytes we can store from the buffer into the env state,
using the size field to know how many that is
for writing:
1. put the env state into a buffer of the size kvm says the register is,
ensuring any upper unused bytes of the buffer are zero
2. write the buffer to kvm
Thanks,
drew
> uint32_t mcounteren;
>
> uint32_t scountinhibit;
> diff --git a/target/riscv/machine.c b/target/riscv/machine.c
> index df2d5bad8d..f3477e153b 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/machine.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/machine.c
> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ssp = {
>
> const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
> .name = "cpu",
> - .version_id = 10,
> - .minimum_version_id = 10,
> + .version_id = 11,
> + .minimum_version_id = 11,
> .post_load = riscv_cpu_post_load,
> .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
> VMSTATE_UINTTL_ARRAY(env.gpr, RISCVCPU, 32),
> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.mtval, RISCVCPU),
> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.miselect, RISCVCPU),
> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.siselect, RISCVCPU),
> - VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
> + VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcounteren, RISCVCPU),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
> --
> 2.49.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong
2025-04-27 5:59 ` Andrew Jones
@ 2025-04-28 11:34 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2025-04-28 12:27 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-28 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer
On 4/27/25 2:59 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 01:02:02PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>> We want to support scounteren as a KVM CSR. The KVM UAPI defines every
>> CSR size as target_ulong, and our env->scounteren is fixed at 32 bits.
>>
>> The other existing cases where the property size does not match the KVM
>> reg size happens with uint64_t properties, like 'mstatus'. When running
>> a 32 bit CPU we'll write a 32 bit 'sstatus' KVM reg into the 64 bit
>> 'mstatus' field. As long as we're consistent, i.e. we're always
>> reading/writing the same words, this is ok.
>>
>> For scounteren, a KVM guest running in a 64 bit CPU will end up writing
>> a 64 bit reg in a 32 bit field. This will have all sort of funny side
>> effects in the KVM guest that we would rather avoid.
>>
>> Increase scounteren to target_ulong to allow KVM to read/write the
>> scounteren CSR without any surprises.
>>
>> Aside from bumping the version of the RISCVCPU vmstate no other
>> behavioral changes are expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
>> ---
>> target/riscv/cpu.h | 9 ++++++++-
>> target/riscv/machine.c | 6 +++---
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> index f5a60d0c52..66d4ddfcb4 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> @@ -400,7 +400,14 @@ struct CPUArchState {
>> */
>> bool two_stage_indirect_lookup;
>>
>> - uint32_t scounteren;
>> + /*
>> + * scounteren is supposed to be an uint32_t, as the spec
>> + * says. We're using a target_ulong instead because the
>> + * scounteren KVM CSR is defined as target_ulong in
>> + * kvm_riscv_csr, and we want to avoid having to deal
>> + * with an ulong reg being read/written in an uint32_t.
>> + */
>> + target_ulong scounteren;
>
> I'm having second thoughts about this. It seems like it should be
> avoidable with the use of an intermediary buffer (which we already
> have -- the uint64_t reg) and with tracking the size of the env state
> by capturing the size with the new macro used to build the array.
scounteren is an uint32_t field so I'm not sure why we need to track it.
> Then,
>
> for reading:
> 1. read the kvm reg into a buffer of the size kvm says it is
> 2. only write the bytes we can store from the buffer into the env state,
> using the size field to know how many that is
>
> for writing:
> 1. put the env state into a buffer of the size kvm says the register is,
> ensuring any upper unused bytes of the buffer are zero
> 2. write the buffer to kvm
So in short we would just read/write the lower 32 bits of scounteren, making it
a 32 bit CSR as far as QEMU is concerned. Given that it is a 32 bit CSR in the
RISC-V ISA too I guess it's safe for QEMU to do this assumption.
Thanks,
Daniel
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
>> uint32_t mcounteren;
>>
>> uint32_t scountinhibit;
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/machine.c b/target/riscv/machine.c
>> index df2d5bad8d..f3477e153b 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/machine.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/machine.c
>> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ssp = {
>>
>> const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
>> .name = "cpu",
>> - .version_id = 10,
>> - .minimum_version_id = 10,
>> + .version_id = 11,
>> + .minimum_version_id = 11,
>> .post_load = riscv_cpu_post_load,
>> .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL_ARRAY(env.gpr, RISCVCPU, 32),
>> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.mtval, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.miselect, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.siselect, RISCVCPU),
>> - VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
>> + VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcounteren, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong
2025-04-27 5:59 ` Andrew Jones
2025-04-28 11:34 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-28 12:27 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-28 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jones
Cc: qemu-devel, qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu,
palmer
On 4/27/25 2:59 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 01:02:02PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>> We want to support scounteren as a KVM CSR. The KVM UAPI defines every
>> CSR size as target_ulong, and our env->scounteren is fixed at 32 bits.
>>
>> The other existing cases where the property size does not match the KVM
>> reg size happens with uint64_t properties, like 'mstatus'. When running
>> a 32 bit CPU we'll write a 32 bit 'sstatus' KVM reg into the 64 bit
>> 'mstatus' field. As long as we're consistent, i.e. we're always
>> reading/writing the same words, this is ok.
>>
>> For scounteren, a KVM guest running in a 64 bit CPU will end up writing
>> a 64 bit reg in a 32 bit field. This will have all sort of funny side
>> effects in the KVM guest that we would rather avoid.
>>
>> Increase scounteren to target_ulong to allow KVM to read/write the
>> scounteren CSR without any surprises.
>>
>> Aside from bumping the version of the RISCVCPU vmstate no other
>> behavioral changes are expected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
>> ---
>> target/riscv/cpu.h | 9 ++++++++-
>> target/riscv/machine.c | 6 +++---
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> index f5a60d0c52..66d4ddfcb4 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> @@ -400,7 +400,14 @@ struct CPUArchState {
>> */
>> bool two_stage_indirect_lookup;
>>
>> - uint32_t scounteren;
>> + /*
>> + * scounteren is supposed to be an uint32_t, as the spec
>> + * says. We're using a target_ulong instead because the
>> + * scounteren KVM CSR is defined as target_ulong in
>> + * kvm_riscv_csr, and we want to avoid having to deal
>> + * with an ulong reg being read/written in an uint32_t.
>> + */
>> + target_ulong scounteren;
>
> I'm having second thoughts about this. It seems like it should be
> avoidable with the use of an intermediary buffer (which we already
> have -- the uint64_t reg) and with tracking the size of the env state
> by capturing the size with the new macro used to build the array.
> Then,
I think I just understood what you mean. You suggested a more generic
approach instead of handling just the scounteren case.
To handle this in a more generic way we can store the size of the env
var using that macro magic you suggested in v1, and then we can handle
all cases where we have a 32 bit env in QEMU exactly like we would handle
scounteren.
I'll do a new version with this change in the patch that introduces
scounteren. Thanks,
Daniel
>
> for reading:
> 1. read the kvm reg into a buffer of the size kvm says it is
> 2. only write the bytes we can store from the buffer into the env state,
> using the size field to know how many that is
>
> for writing:
> 1. put the env state into a buffer of the size kvm says the register is,
> ensuring any upper unused bytes of the buffer are zero
> 2. write the buffer to kvm
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
>> uint32_t mcounteren;
>>
>> uint32_t scountinhibit;
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/machine.c b/target/riscv/machine.c
>> index df2d5bad8d..f3477e153b 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/machine.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/machine.c
>> @@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ssp = {
>>
>> const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
>> .name = "cpu",
>> - .version_id = 10,
>> - .minimum_version_id = 10,
>> + .version_id = 11,
>> + .minimum_version_id = 11,
>> .post_load = riscv_cpu_post_load,
>> .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL_ARRAY(env.gpr, RISCVCPU, 32),
>> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = {
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.mtval, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.miselect, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.siselect, RISCVCPU),
>> - VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
>> + VMSTATE_UINTTL(env.scounteren, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcounteren, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.scountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
>> VMSTATE_UINT32(env.mcountinhibit, RISCVCPU),
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 9/9] target/riscv/kvm: add scounteren CSR
2025-04-25 16:01 [PATCH v3 0/9] target/riscv/kvm: CSR related fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-04-25 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] target/riscv: widen scounteren to target_ulong Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2025-04-25 16:02 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
8 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2025-04-25 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: qemu-riscv, alistair.francis, liwei1518, zhiwei_liu, palmer,
ajones, Daniel Henrique Barboza
Now that CPURISCVState::scounteren is a target_ulong, add support for
the scounteren KVM CSR.
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
index 5efee8adb2..65d6710e4a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ static KVMCPUConfig kvm_csr_cfgs[] = {
KVM_CSR_CFG("stval", stval, RISCV_CSR_REG(stval)),
KVM_CSR_CFG("sip", mip, RISCV_CSR_REG(sip)),
KVM_CSR_CFG("satp", satp, RISCV_CSR_REG(satp)),
+ KVM_CSR_CFG("scounteren", scounteren, RISCV_CSR_REG(scounteren)),
KVM_CSR_CFG("senvcfg", senvcfg, RISCV_CSR_REG(senvcfg)),
};
@@ -699,6 +700,7 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr(CPURISCVState *env)
env->stval = 0;
env->mip = 0;
env->satp = 0;
+ env->scounteren = 0;
env->senvcfg = 0;
}
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread