From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
Hailiang Zhang <zhanghailiang@xfusion.com>
Cc: "Phil Dennis-Jordan" <phil@philjordan.eu>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, devel@daynix.com,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Akihiko Odaki" <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] futex: Check value after qemu_futex_wait()
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 17:51:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250510-event-v2-1-7953177ce1b8@daynix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250510-event-v2-0-7953177ce1b8@daynix.com>
futex(2) - Linux manual page
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/futex.2.html
> Note that a wake-up can also be caused by common futex usage patterns
> in unrelated code that happened to have previously used the futex
> word's memory location (e.g., typical futex-based implementations of
> Pthreads mutexes can cause this under some conditions). Therefore,
> callers should always conservatively assume that a return value of 0
> can mean a spurious wake-up, and use the futex word's value (i.e.,
> the user-space synchronization scheme) to decide whether to continue
> to block or not.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
---
include/qemu/futex.h | 9 +++++++++
tests/unit/test-aio-multithread.c | 4 +++-
util/qemu-thread-posix.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/futex.h b/include/qemu/futex.h
index 91ae88966e12..f57774005330 100644
--- a/include/qemu/futex.h
+++ b/include/qemu/futex.h
@@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ static inline void qemu_futex_wake(void *f, int n)
qemu_futex(f, FUTEX_WAKE, n, NULL, NULL, 0);
}
+/*
+ * Note that a wake-up can also be caused by common futex usage patterns in
+ * unrelated code that happened to have previously used the futex word's
+ * memory location (e.g., typical futex-based implementations of Pthreads
+ * mutexes can cause this under some conditions). Therefore, callers should
+ * always conservatively assume that it is a spurious wake-up, and use the futex
+ * word's value (i.e., the user-space synchronization scheme) to decide whether
+ * to continue to block or not.
+ */
static inline void qemu_futex_wait(void *f, unsigned val)
{
while (qemu_futex(f, FUTEX_WAIT, (int) val, NULL, NULL, 0)) {
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-aio-multithread.c b/tests/unit/test-aio-multithread.c
index 08d4570ccb14..8c2e41545a29 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-aio-multithread.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-aio-multithread.c
@@ -305,7 +305,9 @@ static void mcs_mutex_lock(void)
prev = qatomic_xchg(&mutex_head, id);
if (prev != -1) {
qatomic_set(&nodes[prev].next, id);
- qemu_futex_wait(&nodes[id].locked, 1);
+ while (qatomic_read(&nodes[id].locked) == 1) {
+ qemu_futex_wait(&nodes[id].locked, 1);
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/util/qemu-thread-posix.c b/util/qemu-thread-posix.c
index b2e26e21205b..eade5311d175 100644
--- a/util/qemu-thread-posix.c
+++ b/util/qemu-thread-posix.c
@@ -428,17 +428,21 @@ void qemu_event_wait(QemuEvent *ev)
assert(ev->initialized);
- /*
- * qemu_event_wait must synchronize with qemu_event_set even if it does
- * not go down the slow path, so this load-acquire is needed that
- * synchronizes with the first memory barrier in qemu_event_set().
- *
- * If we do go down the slow path, there is no requirement at all: we
- * might miss a qemu_event_set() here but ultimately the memory barrier in
- * qemu_futex_wait() will ensure the check is done correctly.
- */
- value = qatomic_load_acquire(&ev->value);
- if (value != EV_SET) {
+ while (true) {
+ /*
+ * qemu_event_wait must synchronize with qemu_event_set even if it does
+ * not go down the slow path, so this load-acquire is needed that
+ * synchronizes with the first memory barrier in qemu_event_set().
+ *
+ * If we do go down the slow path, there is no requirement at all: we
+ * might miss a qemu_event_set() here but ultimately the memory barrier
+ * in qemu_futex_wait() will ensure the check is done correctly.
+ */
+ value = qatomic_load_acquire(&ev->value);
+ if (value == EV_SET) {
+ break;
+ }
+
if (value == EV_FREE) {
/*
* Leave the event reset and tell qemu_event_set that there are
@@ -452,7 +456,7 @@ void qemu_event_wait(QemuEvent *ev)
* like the load above.
*/
if (qatomic_cmpxchg(&ev->value, EV_FREE, EV_BUSY) == EV_SET) {
- return;
+ break;
}
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-10 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-10 8:51 [PATCH v2 0/9] Improve futex usage Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` Akihiko Odaki [this message]
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] futex: Support Windows Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] qemu-thread: Avoid futex abstraction for non-Linux Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-05-11 4:41 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] qemu-thread: Use futex for QemuEvent on Windows Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] qemu-thread: Use futex if available for QemuLockCnt Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] migration: Replace QemuSemaphore with QemuEvent Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] migration/colo: " Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] migration/postcopy: " Akihiko Odaki
2025-05-10 8:51 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] hw/display/apple-gfx: " Akihiko Odaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250510-event-v2-1-7953177ce1b8@daynix.com \
--to=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@daynix.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@philjordan.eu \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=zhanghailiang@xfusion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).