From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <gost.dev@samsung.com>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>,
<dave@stgolabs.net>, <vishak.g@samsung.com>,
<krish.reddy@samsung.com>, <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
<alok.rathore@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:45:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610154501.0000213b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250602135942.2773823-4-arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 19:29:42 +0530
Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com> wrote:
Very interesting to see support for this. It will enable a load
of additional test cases.
> added assert-deassert PERST implementation, reset PPB
> for physical port.
Added
Please also include some details of testing done and what happens.
Given I know we have some issues with reset that we haven't resolved
I'm curious if you see them here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arpit Kumar <arpit1.kumar@samsung.com>
> +/* Assert - Deassert PERST */
> +#define ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS 100
> +
> /* link state flags */
> #define LINK_STATE_FLAG_LANE_REVERSED (1 << 0)
> #define LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED (1 << 1)
> @@ -662,6 +666,114 @@ static CXLRetCode cmd_get_physical_port_state(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> +static struct PCIDevice *cxl_find_port_dev(uint8_t ppb_id, PCIBus *bus)
> +{
> + PCIDevice *d;
> + int devfn;
> +
> + for (devfn = 0; devfn < ARRAY_SIZE(bus->devices); devfn++) {
As in patch one, maybe use the for_each_pci_... Though with the callback
needed it may end up slightly more complex that this.
> + d = bus->devices[devfn];
> + if (d) {
> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(d), TYPE_CXL_DSP)) {
> + uint8_t port = PCIE_PORT(d)->port;
I'd not bother with the local variable for this one.
if (PCIE_PORT(d)->port == ppb_id) {
return d;
}
> + if (port == ppb_id) {
> + return d;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static CXLRetCode deassert_PERST(Object *obj, ResetType type, uint8_t pn, CXLCCI *cci)
> +{
> + ResettableClass *rc = RESETTABLE_GET_CLASS(obj);
> + ResettableState *s = rc->get_state(obj);
> +
> + if (cci->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_PERST) {
> + if (cci->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time == -1 && !s->hold_phase_pending) {
I'd flip the logic as then can return early in error case and reduce
indent of the rest.
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&cci->pports.perst[pn].lock);
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&cci->pports.prst[pn].lock);
> + resettable_release_reset(obj, type);
> + cci->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_PERST = false;
> + cci->pports.pport_info[pn].link_state_flags &=
> + ~LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED;
> + cci->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&cci->pports.perst[pn].lock);
and drop explicit unlock.
> + } else {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> + } else {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static CXLRetCode assert_PERST(Object *obj, ResetType type, uint8_t pn, CXLCCI *cci)
> +{
> + ResettableClass *rc = RESETTABLE_GET_CLASS(obj);
> + ResettableState *s = rc->get_state(obj);
> +
> + if (cci->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_PERST || s->exit_phase_in_progress) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> +
WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() perhaps
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&cci->pports.perst[pn].lock);
> + cci->pports.perst[pn].issued_assert_PERST = true;
> + cci->pports.pport_info[pn].link_state_flags |=
> + LINK_STATE_FLAG_PERST_ASSERTED;
> + resettable_assert_reset(obj, type);
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&cci->pports.perst[pn].lock);
> +
> + /* holding reset phase for 100ms */
> + while (cci->pports.perst[pn].asrt_time--) {
> + usleep(1000);
Is this happening synchronously? I'd kind of expect it to be a background thing
where we'd just check it had finished.
> + }
> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +/*CXL r3.2 Section 7.6.7.1.3: Get Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h)*/
> +static CXLRetCode cmd_physical_port_control(const struct cxl_cmd *cmd,
> + uint8_t *payload_in,
> + size_t len_in,
> + uint8_t *payload_out,
> + size_t *len_out,
> + CXLCCI *cci)
> +{
> + PCIBus *bus = &PCI_BRIDGE(cci->d)->sec_bus;
> + PCIDevice *dev;
> + struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
> + uint8_t PPB_ID;
> + uint8_t Ports_Op;
> + } QEMU_PACKED *in;
> +
> + in = (struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl *)payload_in;
Often we cheat on these where the type is locally defined and do
struct cxl_fmapi_get_physical_port_control_req_pl {
uint8_t ppb_id;
uint8_t ports_op;
} QEMU_PACKED *in = (void *)payload_in;
Given it's all together the type isn't confusing or ambiguous even
though we use a void * instead of the more specific cast.
Note also that it is better to stick to local style and use lower_case
style for structure element naming etc.
> +
> + if (len_in < sizeof(*in)) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_PAYLOAD_LENGTH;
> + }
> +
> + uint8_t pn = in->PPB_ID;
> + dev = cxl_find_port_dev(pn, bus);
> + if (!dev) {
> + return CXL_MBOX_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> + }
> +
> + switch (in->Ports_Op) {
> + case 0:
> + assert_PERST(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), RESET_TYPE_COLD, pn, cci);
Even for these probably
assert_perst()
> + break;
return CXL_MBOX_SUCESS;
> + case 1:
> + deassert_PERST(OBJECT(&dev->qdev), RESET_TYPE_COLD, pn, cci);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + device_cold_reset(&dev->qdev);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return CXL_MBOX_INVALID_INPUT;
> + }
> + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> @@ -3878,4 +3995,15 @@ void cxl_initialize_usp_mctpcci(CXLCCI *cci, DeviceState *d, DeviceState *intf,
> cci->intf = intf;
> cxl_init_cci(cci, payload_max);
> cxl_set_phy_port_info(cci); /* store port info */
> + /* physical port control */
> + for (int i = 0; i < PCI_DEVFN_MAX; i++) {
> + qemu_mutex_init(&cci->pports.perst[i].lock);
perst is definitely port wise - not linked to CCI so that stuff should be
in the port structures themselves.
> + cci->pports.perst[i].issued_assert_PERST = false;
> + /* Assert PERST involves physical port to be in
wrap at 80 chars.
> + * hold reset phase for minimum 100ms. No other calls
> + * are entertained until Deassert PERST command.
> + * https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20190523194409.17718-1-niklas.cassel@linaro.org/#2178369
Blocking other commands is fine but we should lock up emulation of other stuff
in the system and I think you currently do.
> + */
> + cci->pports.perst[i].asrt_time = ASSERT_WAIT_TIME_MS;
> + }
> }
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> index 9eb128a1e8..f877d60b39 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -146,10 +146,18 @@ struct cxl_phy_port_info {
> uint8_t supported_ld_count;
> } QEMU_PACKED;
>
> +/* assert-deassert PERST */
> +struct pperst {
> + bool issued_assert_PERST;
> + int asrt_time;
> + QemuMutex lock;
> +};
> +
> struct phy_port {
> uint8_t num_ports;
> uint8_t active_port_bitmask[0x20];
> struct cxl_phy_port_info pport_info[PCI_DEVFN_MAX];
> + struct pperst perst[PCI_DEVFN_MAX];
> };
>
> /* CXL r3.1 Table 8-34: Command Return Codes */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250602140008epcas5p25fce01492de105da3cdc0aaa533f6ebc@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-06-02 13:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] FM-API Physical switch command set update Arpit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20250602140018epcas5p2de38473dfcc0369193dd826c6e0e3fac@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-06-02 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] hw/cxl: Storing physical ports info during enumeration Arpit Kumar
2025-06-10 14:21 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-06-17 9:46 ` Arpit Kumar
2025-06-18 11:31 ` Jonathan Cameron via
[not found] ` <CGME20250602140026epcas5p131c1af3cdd05056e7dccf0f91efe490b@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-06-02 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] hw/cxl: Simplified Identify Switch Device & Get Physical Port State Arpit Kumar
2025-06-10 14:29 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-06-17 10:01 ` Arpit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20250602140045epcas5p2445a99b249ba9588af027d59b0c8bd35@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2025-06-02 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] hw/cxl: Add Physical Port Control (Opcode 5102h) Arpit Kumar
2025-06-10 14:45 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2025-06-17 10:11 ` Arpit Kumar
2025-06-18 11:32 ` Jonathan Cameron via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250610154501.0000213b@huawei.com \
--to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=a.manzanares@samsung.com \
--cc=alok.rathore@samsung.com \
--cc=arpit1.kumar@samsung.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=krish.reddy@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=vishak.g@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).