From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
eblake@redhat.com, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Aarushi Mehta <mehta.aaru20@gmail.com>,
hibriansong@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/12] block/io_uring: use non-vectored read/write when possible
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:08:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250620000829.1426291-13-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620000829.1426291-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
The io_uring_prep_readv2/writev2() man pages recommend using the
non-vectored read/write operations when possible for performance
reasons.
I didn't measure a significant difference but it doesn't hurt to have
this optimization in place.
Suggested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
block/io_uring.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/io_uring.c b/block/io_uring.c
index dd930ee57e..bbefbddcc0 100644
--- a/block/io_uring.c
+++ b/block/io_uring.c
@@ -49,12 +49,24 @@ static void luring_prep_sqe(struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, void *opaque)
#ifdef HAVE_IO_URING_PREP_WRITEV2
{
int luring_flags = (flags & BDRV_REQ_FUA) ? RWF_DSYNC : 0;
- io_uring_prep_writev2(sqe, fd, qiov->iov,
- qiov->niov, offset, luring_flags);
+ if (luring_flags != 0 || qiov->niov > 1) {
+ io_uring_prep_writev2(sqe, fd, qiov->iov,
+ qiov->niov, offset, luring_flags);
+ } else {
+ /* The man page says non-vectored is faster than vectored */
+ struct iovec *iov = qiov->iov;
+ io_uring_prep_write(sqe, fd, iov->iov_base, iov->iov_len, offset);
+ }
}
#else
assert(flags == 0);
- io_uring_prep_writev(sqe, fd, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, offset);
+ if (qiov->niov > 1) {
+ io_uring_prep_writev(sqe, fd, qiov->iov, qiov->niov, offset);
+ } else {
+ /* The man page says non-vectored is faster than vectored */
+ struct iovec *iov = qiov->iov;
+ io_uring_prep_write(sqe, fd, iov->iov_base, iov->iov_len, offset);
+ }
#endif
break;
case QEMU_AIO_ZONE_APPEND:
@@ -65,8 +77,15 @@ static void luring_prep_sqe(struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, void *opaque)
if (req->resubmit_qiov.iov != NULL) {
qiov = &req->resubmit_qiov;
}
- io_uring_prep_readv(sqe, fd, qiov->iov, qiov->niov,
- offset + req->total_read);
+ if (qiov->niov > 1) {
+ io_uring_prep_readv(sqe, fd, qiov->iov, qiov->niov,
+ offset + req->total_read);
+ } else {
+ /* The man page says non-vectored is faster than vectored */
+ struct iovec *iov = qiov->iov;
+ io_uring_prep_read(sqe, fd, iov->iov_base, iov->iov_len,
+ offset + req->total_read);
+ }
break;
}
case QEMU_AIO_FLUSH:
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 0:08 [PATCH v2 00/12] aio: add the aio_add_sqe() io_uring API Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] aio-posix: fix race between io_uring CQE and AioHandler deletion Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-23 20:25 ` Eric Blake
2025-07-02 12:10 ` Kevin Wolf
2025-07-21 18:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-07-21 20:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] aio-posix: keep polling enabled with fdmon-io_uring.c Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] tests/unit: skip test-nested-aio-poll with io_uring Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] aio-posix: integrate fdmon into glib event loop Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] aio: remove aio_context_use_g_source() Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] aio: free AioContext when aio_context_new() fails Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] aio: add errp argument to aio_context_setup() Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] aio-posix: gracefully handle io_uring_queue_init() failure Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-23 20:39 ` Eric Blake
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] aio-posix: add aio_add_sqe() API for user-defined io_uring requests Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] aio-posix: avoid EventNotifier for cqe_handler_bh Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] block/io_uring: use aio_add_sqe() Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-06-20 0:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2025-06-23 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] block/io_uring: use non-vectored read/write when possible Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250620000829.1426291-13-stefanha@redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hibriansong@gmail.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mehta.aaru20@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).