From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8314C7115C for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uSd2k-0004f7-QX; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:48:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uSd2e-0004ee-71 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:48:32 -0400 Received: from [185.176.79.56] (helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uSd2T-0002cd-SO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:48:24 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4bP0b465hNz6L56V; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 22:43:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A8881400D7; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 22:48:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 16:48:15 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 15:48:13 +0100 To: CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] hw/cxl: Add emulation for memory sparing control feature Message-ID: <20250620154813.00002bbd@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250619151619.1695-8-shiju.jose@huawei.com> References: <20250619151619.1695-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20250619151619.1695-8-shiju.jose@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.203.177.66] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.241) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 185.176.79.56 (deferred) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -33 X-Spam_score: -3.4 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jonathan Cameron From: Jonathan Cameron via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:16:19 +0100 wrote: > From: Shiju Jose > > Memory sparing is defined as a repair function that replaces a portion of > memory with a portion of functional memory at that same DPA. The subclasses > for this operation vary in terms of the scope of the sparing being > performed. The Cacheline sparing subclass refers to a sparing action that > can replace a full cacheline. Row sparing is provided as an alternative to > PPR sparing functions and its scope is that of a single DDR row. Bank > sparing allows an entire bank to be replaced. Rank sparing is defined as > an operation in which an entire DDR rank is replaced. > > Memory sparing maintenance operations may be supported by CXL devices > that implement CXL.mem protocol. A sparing maintenance operation requests > the CXL device to perform a repair operation on its media. > For example, a CXL device with DRAM components that support memory sparing > features may implement sparing Maintenance operations. > > The host may issue a query command by setting Query Resources flag in the > Input Payload (CXL Spec 3.2 Table 8-120) to determine availability of > sparing resources for a given address. In response to a query request, > the device shall report the resource availability by producing the Memory > Sparing Event Record (CXL Spec 3.2 Table 8-60) in which the Channel, Rank, > Nibble Mask, Bank Group, Bank, Row, Column, Sub-Channel fields are a copy > of the values specified in the request. > > During the execution of a sparing maintenance operation, a CXL memory device: > - May or may not retain data > - May or may not be able to process CXL.mem requests correctly. > These CXL memory device capabilities are specified by restriction flags > in the memory sparing feature readable attributes. > > When a CXL device identifies error on a memory component, the device > may inform the host about the need for a memory sparing maintenance > operation by using DRAM event record, where the 'maintenance needed' flag > may set. The event record contains some of the DPA, Channel, Rank, > Nibble Mask, Bank Group, Bank, Row, Column, Sub-Channel fields that > should be repaired. The userspace tool requests for maintenance operation > if the 'maintenance needed' flag set in the CXL DRAM error record. > > CXL spec 3.2 section 8.2.10.7.2.3 describes the memory sparing feature > discovery and configuration. > > CXL spec 3.2 section 8.2.10.7.1.4 describes the device's memory sparing > maintenance operation feature. > > Add emulation for CXL memory device memory sparing control feature > and memory sparing maintenance operation command. > > TODO: Following are the pending tasks, though not sure how to implement. > 1. Add emulation for memory sparing maintenance operation. At most wipe the data if advertising that it won't be retained. No need to actually do anything. > 2. On query, report memory sparing resource availability in a memory sparing > event record if required in the future. I'd go with a a per device per type set of counters. Lets just say we have X of them on a device - once used up they are gone. No need to worry too much on what X is. Just pick some values so we have something to test against. 4 maybe enough for testing? Some comments on previous patch feed through to here. A few more things inline. Jonathan > > Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose > --- > hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 295 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/mem/cxl_type3.c | 44 ++++++ > include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 40 +++++ > 3 files changed, 379 insertions(+) > > > +typedef struct CXLMemSparingMaintInPayload { > + uint8_t flags; > + uint8_t channel; > + uint8_t rank; > + uint8_t nibble_mask[3]; > + uint8_t bank_group; > + uint8_t bank; > + uint8_t row[3]; > + uint16_t column; > + uint8_t sub_channel; > +} QEMU_PACKED CXLMemSparingMaintInPayload; > + > +static CXLRetCode cxl_perform_mem_sparing(CXLType3Dev *ct3d, uint8_t sub_class, > + void *maint_pi) > +{ > + CXLMemSparingMaintInPayload *sparing_maint_pi = (void *)maint_pi; Odd spacing > + > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Memory Sparing Maintenance Input Payload...\n"); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "flags = %u\n", sparing_maint_pi->flags); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "channel= %u\n", sparing_maint_pi->channel); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "rank = %u\n", sparing_maint_pi->rank); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "nibble_mask[0] = 0x%x\n", > + sparing_maint_pi->nibble_mask[0]); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "nibble_mask[1] = 0x%x\n", > + sparing_maint_pi->nibble_mask[1]); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "nibble_mask[2] = 0x%x\n", > + sparing_maint_pi->nibble_mask[2]); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "bank_group = %u\n", > + sparing_maint_pi->bank_group); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "bank = %u\n", sparing_maint_pi->bank); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "row[0] = 0x%x\n", sparing_maint_pi->row[0]); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "row[1] = 0x%x\n", sparing_maint_pi->row[1]); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "row[2] = 0x%x\n", sparing_maint_pi->row[2]); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "column = %u\n", sparing_maint_pi->column); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "sub_channel = %u\n", > + sparing_maint_pi->sub_channel); LOG_UNIMP is a bit odd given there is nothing to do really. > + > + switch (sub_class) { > + case 0: /* Cacheline Memory Sparing */ > + qemu_log("Cacheline Memory Sparing\n"); > + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; > + case 1: /* Row Memory Sparing */ > + qemu_log("Row Memory Sparing\n"); > + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; > + case 2: /* Bank Memory Sparing */ > + qemu_log("Bank Memory Sparing\n"); > + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; > + case 3: /* Rank Memory Sparing */ > + qemu_log("Rank Memory Sparing\n"); > + return CXL_MBOX_SUCCESS; > + default: > + return CXL_MBOX_UNSUPPORTED; As previously - I think this is invalid parameter as the command is supported just not the sub_class. > + } > +} > +