From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73275C77B7C for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uUX3h-0002zE-5J; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:49:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uUX3g-0002z6-4V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:49:28 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uUX3d-0005CU-NG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:49:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750884564; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IgjEuRgTFxHaoS/NtDjx44kWrVq89i+T3Ffek1Q7VJM=; b=fcUJEicqX1kGrOdEsW8Kv0wSIhSb9ous3XkRLurOZekny7oswoOkBTu03iPvalREmwLlAy x4CqA4aMv1jA+jQZTwvK9ssXrOHFx4682//CTHz5ps/0EmEt8Yqq37Tfz4ZHOnpEfQKmPF UL6JiSbooDzN+aJl0ZpqQfBcIr098WQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-627-yrtR_2-HPcukPtchNP-G5A-1; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:49:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yrtR_2-HPcukPtchNP-G5A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: yrtR_2-HPcukPtchNP-G5A_1750884561 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a4f3796779so114415f8f.1 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:49:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750884561; x=1751489361; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IgjEuRgTFxHaoS/NtDjx44kWrVq89i+T3Ffek1Q7VJM=; b=tjGttvppep2Fcuw6uJsPdUiYWLXl7rlU9teiLTuq8EE25mVOLUwooD87SckgO9LcYP 6+xhX/75XhPkyWU1RSJWZi/VvEpOdRq4obg594E0q51J6b0wAFNiNuJueY8sILW5y61m D9Lsy8lJkeALtzbU8GKZPL+AG8jQBet+b6dz6vewD7wpb/yTT4K8DBSuz2G1ekCHjdg5 hLrAxJJYfrTmCuWas5U3yRF08cAtRhv07copNSCPMsqX7GhBNNc8gaC4xBrMdTaBJXZB kQHp3BgWc64hVljw5tOE/sMhII5GoxU4bAOXLJRVsjFcMj8c5fgPOLDgIBW6axTIBEMo sZdQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUYjoI09kSmkCY0tvqjmb21/7Xeq4m/qBsCI4xyXAnLCoJbvxtF4m78moOyP+fubLWUOWd5sDdH0cct@nongnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzMZ934DY62a0DmMR5s0ZJKSFL2BcVKxgU2PLjsCZ0mGgXkbBGa 30sCEW3CmOl7x+YPaNnNxJX62cDXWkTUNr7lkFCG87jB4gKFmKOu3O7f4tiOjABImd5qpfrxSM4 fR0OuNFq8UzX45Stnxzg5Q1pgSZXucRtiXkFiM4lHKRv0kjoUD8ahQWhB X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvNEJI8po99Lky1tVe97/GSL0FCW1kQRJWNHBNIJX2yYad1x2z+7XkolO60OWJ oGi36W/zSzKJ5F0bObQmuezrqd4VugGNwsxuCRbIA7Ka0PeEX9S+uI7eKgx5rKWCDavN3CY9W3S vfiUQMcL8mS1W+gYBE+nJ03c+U3qjS3euOgO5TQz5R3she0SjG3V6H/du093y6cc3Coq5i+wthR 88nsYJWCyKxFdgKcx7Ds/P2uLQxUYkAJ2sLGMz5pSZXtspMzhKfUJJUp2dVoKHp5ZZsNP1aoV+s lZeS+MxuAnC8Zgph X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1449:b0:3a4:dbac:2dc1 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6ed6506a3mr4214041f8f.54.1750884561287; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:49:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEmPuSc+MUPsdKgJn0ypcQ7fy5LNnoerPJFWY/XgwG/Nxhg0M//QwuCVdfYLgF95AbM2VxGWA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1449:b0:3a4:dbac:2dc1 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6ed6506a3mr4214013f8f.54.1750884560818; Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2a06:c701:73ea:4300:f7cc:3f8:48e8:2142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6e811724bsm5344208f8f.100.2025.06.25.13.49.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:49:17 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Daniel P =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Thomas Huth , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Gerd Hoffmann , Mark Cave-Ayland , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Stefan Hajnoczi , Alexander Graf , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] docs: define policy forbidding use of AI code generators Message-ID: <20250625164902-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20250616092241.212898-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20250616092241.212898-4-armbru@redhat.com> <20250625150941-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 04:47:06PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 4:39 PM Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > > Am 25.06.2025 um 21:16 hat Michael S. Tsirkin geschrieben: > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:22:41AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > > > From: Daniel P. Berrangé > > > > > > > > There has been an explosion of interest in so called AI code > > > > generators. Thus far though, this is has not been matched by a broadly > > > > accepted legal interpretation of the licensing implications for code > > > > generator outputs. While the vendors may claim there is no problem and > > > > a free choice of license is possible, they have an inherent conflict > > > > of interest in promoting this interpretation. More broadly there is, > > > > as yet, no broad consensus on the licensing implications of code > > > > generators trained on inputs under a wide variety of licenses > > > > > > > > The DCO requires contributors to assert they have the right to > > > > contribute under the designated project license. Given the lack of > > > > consensus on the licensing of AI code generator output, it is not > > > > considered credible to assert compliance with the DCO clause (b) or (c) > > > > where a patch includes such generated code. > > > > > > > > This patch thus defines a policy that the QEMU project will currently > > > > not accept contributions where use of AI code generators is either > > > > known, or suspected. > > > > > > > > These are early days of AI-assisted software development. The legal > > > > questions will be resolved eventually. The tools will mature, and we > > > > can expect some to become safely usable in free software projects. > > > > The policy we set now must be for today, and be open to revision. It's > > > > best to start strict and safe, then relax. > > > > > > > > Meanwhile requests for exceptions can also be considered on a case by > > > > case basis. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé > > > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > > > > Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster > > > > > > Sorry about only reacting now, was AFK. > > > > > > So one usecase that to me seems entirely valid, is refactoring. > > > > > > For example, change a function prototype, or a structure, > > > and have an LLM update all callers. > > > > > > The only part of the patch that is expressive is the > > > actual change, the rest is a technicality and has IMHO nothing to do with > > > copyright. LLMs can just do it with no hassle. > > > > > > > > > Can we soften this to only apply to expressive code? > > > > > > I feel a lot of cleanups would be enabled by this. > > > > Hasn't refactoring been a (deterministically) solved problem long before > > LLMs became capable to do the same with a good enough probability? > > It's easier to describe a desired refactoring to an LLM in natural > language than to figure out the regexes, semantic patches, etc needed > for traditional refactoring tools. > > Also, LLMs can perform higher level refactorings that might not be > supported by traditional tools. Things like "split this interface into > callbacks that take a Foo * argument and implement the callbacks for > both a.c and b.c". > > I think what Daniel mentioned is a good guide: if it's something that > you think it copyrightable, then avoid it. > > Stefan Right. Let's put that in the doc? -- MST