From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, eduardo@habkost.net,
steven.sistare@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] qtest/qom-test: Shallow testing of qom-list / qom-get
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 15:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250725135034.2280477-3-armbru@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725135034.2280477-1-armbru@redhat.com>
This test traverses the QOM sub-tree rooted at /machine with a
combination of qom-list and qom-get. In my x86_64 testing, it runs
almost 12000 QMP commands in 34 seconds. With -m slow, we test more
machines, and it takes almost 84000 commands in almost four minutes.
Since commit 3dd93992ffb (tests/qtest/qom-test: unit test for
qom-list-get), the test traverses this tree a second time, with
qom-list-get. In my x86_64 testing, this takes some 200 QMP commands
and around two seconds, and some 1100 in just under 12s with -m slow.
Traversing the entire tree is useful, because it exercise the QOM
property getters. Traversing it twice not so much.
Make the qom-list / qom-get test shallow unless -m slow is given:
don't recurse. Cuts the number of commands to around 600, and run
time to under 5s for me.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
tests/qtest/qom-test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/qtest/qom-test.c b/tests/qtest/qom-test.c
index cb5dbfe329..40bdc3639f 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/qom-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/qom-test.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static void test_properties(QTestState *qts, const char *path, bool recurse)
links = g_slist_delete_link(links, links);
}
while (children) {
- test_properties(qts, children->data, true);
+ test_properties(qts, children->data, g_test_slow());
g_free(children->data);
children = g_slist_delete_link(children, children);
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 13:50 [PATCH 0/5] qtest/qom-test: Leak plug, faster, better coverage Markus Armbruster
2025-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] qtest/qom-test: Plug memory leak with -p Markus Armbruster
2025-08-04 17:11 ` Steven Sistare
2025-08-05 6:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-08-05 12:07 ` Steven Sistare
2025-07-25 13:50 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2025-08-04 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] qtest/qom-test: Shallow testing of qom-list / qom-get Steven Sistare
2025-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] qtest/qom-test: Traverse entire QOM tree Markus Armbruster
2025-08-04 16:40 ` Steven Sistare
2025-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] qtest/qom-test: Don't bother to execute QMP command quit Markus Armbruster
2025-08-04 17:10 ` Steven Sistare
2025-08-05 6:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-08-05 12:03 ` Steven Sistare
2025-07-25 13:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Cover tests/qtest/qom-test.c Markus Armbruster
2025-08-04 7:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] qtest/qom-test: Leak plug, faster, better coverage Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250725135034.2280477-3-armbru@redhat.com \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).